Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment of Sensititre and Agar Disk Diffusion for Determining Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Bovine Clinical Mastitis Pathogens

被引:19
|
作者
Saini, V. [1 ]
Riekerink, R. G. M. Olde [2 ]
McClure, J. T. [2 ]
Barkema, H. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Prod Anim Hlth, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[2] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Atlantic Vet Coll, Dept Hlth Management, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
关键词
SUSCEPTIBILITY SYSTEM; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.02209-10
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Determining the accuracy and precision of a measuring instrument is pertinent in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. This study was conducted to predict the diagnostic accuracy of the Sensititre MIC mastitis panel (Sensititre) and agar disk diffusion (ADD) method with reference to the manual broth microdilution test method for antimicrobial resistance profiling of Escherichia coli (n = 156), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 154), streptococcal (n = 116), and enterococcal (n = 31) bovine clinical mastitis isolates. The activities of ampicillin, ceftiofur, cephalothin, erythromycin, oxacillin, penicillin, the penicillin-novobiocin combination, pirlimycin, and tetracycline were tested against the isolates. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; intertest essential and categorical agreements were determined as well. Sensititre and the ADD method demonstrated moderate to highly accurate (71 to 99%) and moderate to perfect (71 to 100%) predictive accuracies for 74 and 76% of the isolate-antimicrobial MIC combinations, respectively. However, the diagnostic accuracy was low for S. aureus-ceftiofur/oxacillin combinations and other streptococcus-ampicillin combinations by either testing method. Essential agreement between Sensititre automatic MIC readings and MIC readings obtained by the broth microdilution test method was 87%. Essential agreement between Sensititre automatic and manual MIC reading methods was 97%. Furthermore, the ADD test method and Sensititre MIC method exhibited 92 and 91% categorical agreement (sensitive, intermediate, resistant) of results, respectively, compared with the reference method. However, both methods demonstrated lower agreement for E. coli-ampicillin/cephalothin combinations than for Gram-positive isolates. In conclusion, the Sensititre and ADD methods had moderate to high diagnostic accuracy and very good essential and categorical agreement for most udder pathogen-antimicrobial combinations and can be readily employed in veterinary diagnostic laboratories.
引用
收藏
页码:1568 / 1577
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Antimicrobial susceptibility of bovine clinical mastitis pathogens in Japan and development of a simplified agar disk diffusion method for clinical practice
    Kawai, Kazuhiro
    Kurumisawa, Tomomi
    Shinozuka, Yasunori
    Higuchi, Hidetoshi
    Iwano, Hidetomo
    Hayashi, Tomohito
    Ozawa, Manao
    Koike, Ryoji
    Uchiyama, Mariko
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 85 (02): : 143 - 148
  • [2] Assessment of accuracy of disk diffusion tests for the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility of common bovine mastitis pathogens: A novel approach
    Klement, E
    Chaffer, M
    Leitner, G
    Shwimmer, A
    Friedman, S
    Saran, A
    Shpigel, N
    MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE, 2005, 11 (04) : 342 - 350
  • [3] Comparison between broth microdilution and agar disk diffusion methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bovine mastitis pathogens
    Palladini, Giorgia
    Garbarino, Chiara
    Luppi, Andrea
    Russo, Simone
    Filippi, Anita
    Arrigoni, Norma
    Massella, Elisa
    Ricchi, Matteo
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2023, 212
  • [4] Pathogens isolated from bovine clinical mastitis and their antimicrobial resistance
    Ardicli, Ozge
    Demirbilek, Serpil Kahya
    Carli, Kamil Tayfun
    MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA-VETERINARY MEDICINE-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2022, 78 (01): : 19 - 24
  • [5] Antimicrobial resistance profiles of 5 common bovine mastitis pathogens in large Chinese dairy herds
    Cheng, Jia
    Qu, Weijie
    Barkema, Herman W.
    Nobrega, Diego B.
    Gao, Jian
    Liu, Gang
    De Buck, Jeroen
    Kastelic, John P.
    Sun, Hong
    Han, Bo
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (03) : 2416 - 2426
  • [6] Antimicrobial resistance and virulence profiles of staphylococci isolated from clinical bovine mastitis
    Yang, Feng
    Shi, Wenli
    Meng, Na
    Zhao, Yiyu
    Ding, Xuezhi
    Li, Qinfan
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [7] Proposal for agar disk diffusion interpretive criteria for susceptibility testing of bovine mastitis pathogens using cefoperazone 30 μg disks
    Fessler, Andrea T.
    Kaspar, Heike
    Lindeman, Cynthia J.
    Peters, Thomas
    Watts, Jeffrey L.
    Schwarz, Stefan
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 200 : 65 - 70
  • [8] Genetic and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Mammary Pathogenic E. coli (MPEC) Isolates from Bovine Clinical Mastitis
    Campos, Fernanda C.
    Castilho, Ivana G.
    Rossi, Bruna F.
    Bonsaglia, Erika C. R.
    Dantas, Stefani T. A.
    Dias, Regiane C. B.
    Fernandes Junior, Ary
    Hernandes, Rodrigo T.
    Camargo, Carlos H.
    Ribeiro, Marcio G.
    Pantoja, Jose C. F.
    Langoni, Helio
    Rall, Vera L. M.
    PATHOGENS, 2022, 11 (12):
  • [9] PREVALENCE, ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE PROFILES OF CLINICAL AND SUBCLIN-ICAL MASTITIS IN LACTATING COW WITH ASSESSMENT OF TREATMENT TRIAL
    Abo-Zaid, A. A.
    El-Mekawey, M. F.
    Soliman, A. H.
    El-Neshwy, Wafaa M.
    SLOVENIAN VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2023, 60 : 327 - 339
  • [10] Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antimicrobial resistance profiles in Streptococcus dysgalactiae isolated from bovine clinical mastitis in 5 provinces of China
    Zhang, Shiyao
    Piepers, Sofie
    Shan, Ruixue
    Cai, Lingjie
    Mao, Shuanglan
    Zou, Jiaqi
    Ali, Tariq
    De Vliegher, Sarne
    Han, Bo
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (04) : 3344 - 3355