Psychometric evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function and Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Test for subacromial impingement syndrome

被引:11
|
作者
Strong, Benjamin [1 ]
Maloney, Michael [1 ]
Baumhauer, Judith [1 ]
Schaffer, Joseph [1 ]
Houck, Jeff R. [1 ]
Hung, Man [2 ]
Bounsanga, Jerry [2 ]
Voss, Maren W. [2 ]
Gu, Yushan [2 ]
Voloshin, Ilya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
PROMIS; CAT; physical function; pain interference; shoulder diagnoses; ASES; FUNCTION ITEM BANK; AMERICAN SHOULDER; UPPER EXTREMITY; VALIDITY; FOOT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.024
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) was previously validated for rotator cuff disease and shoulder instability. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) CAT, PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) CAT, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Function Score for subacromial impingement syndrome. Methods: PROMIS PF CAT, PI CAT, and ASES (Pain, Function, Total) were collected on all visits for 2 surgeons between January 2016 and August 2016. New patients, aged 18 years and older, were selected by International Classification of Diseases code for impingement syndrome of the shoulder. The mean number of questions answered determined efficiency. Person-item maps were created to determine ceiling and floor effects as well as person reliability. Convergent validity was determined by comparison of PROMIS domains to ASES scores with Pearson correlations. Results: For PROMIS PF CAT, the mean number of items answered was 4.54 (range 4-12). The ceiling effect was 1.56%, and the floor effect was 3.13%. The person reliability was 0.94. Pearson correlation coefficients between the PF CAT and ASES were 0.664 (ASES Function), 0.426 (ASES Pain), and 0.649 (ASES Total). For PROMIS PI CAT, the mean number of items answered was 4.27 (range 3-11). The ceiling effect was 4.69%, and the floor effect was 8.33%. The person reliability was 0.92. Pearson correlation coefficients between the PI CAT and ASES were: 0.667 (ASES Function), 0.594 (ASES Pain), and 0.729 (ASES Total). Conclusions: The psychometric properties of PROMIS PF and PI CATs were favorable for subacromial impingement syndrome. (C) 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 329
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function and pain interference in spine surgery
    Khalifeh, Jawad M.
    Dibble, Christopher F.
    Hawesli, Ammar H.
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [2] Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test
    Beckmann, James T.
    Hung, Man
    Voss, Maren W.
    Crum, Anthony B.
    Bounsanga, Jerry
    Tyser, Andrew R.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 41 (07): : 739 - U146
  • [3] The Impact of Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Approach on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Tests of Physical Function and Pain Interference
    Quinzi, David A.
    Childs, Sean
    Ben Kuhns
    Balkissoon, Rishi
    Drinkwater, Christopher
    Ginnetti, John
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (10): : 2899 - 2903
  • [4] Impact of Patient Demographic Factors on Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression Computer Adaptive Testing Scores in Patients Undergoing Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
    Meldau, Jason E.
    Borowsky, Peter
    Blanchett, Jacob
    Stephens, Jeffrey
    Muh, Stephanie
    Moutzouros, Vasilios
    Makhni, Eric C.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (11)
  • [5] MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES FOR PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROMIS) FATIGUE AND PAIN INTERFERENCE SCORES
    Beaumont, J. L.
    Fries, J. F.
    Curtis, J. R.
    Cella, D.
    Yun, H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A165 - A166
  • [6] Minimally Important Differences for Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (Promis) Fatigue and Pain Interference Scores
    Beaumont, Jennifer
    Fries, James F.
    Curtis, Jeffrey R.
    Cella, David
    Yun, Huifeng
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 : 373 - 374
  • [7] Utility of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function form in inflammatory myopathy
    Saygin, Didem
    Oddis, Chester V.
    Dzanko, Sedin
    Koontz, Diane
    Moghadam-Kia, Siamak
    Ardalan, Kaveh
    Coles, Theresa M.
    Aggarwal, Rohit
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2021, 51 (03) : 539 - 546
  • [8] Developing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
    Ader, Deborah N.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) : S1 - S2
  • [9] Clinimetrics: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®)
    Roorda, Leo D.
    Crins, Martine H. P.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2019, 65 (02) : 110 - 110
  • [10] The Recovery Curve for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Patient-Reported Physical Function and Pain Interference Computerized Adaptive Tests After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Kagan, Ryland
    Anderson, Mike B.
    Christensen, Jesse C.
    Peters, Christopher L.
    Gililland, Jeremy M.
    Pelt, Christopher E.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (08): : 2471 - 2474