Dissolved air flotation (DAF) is a widely used treatment process in drinking water and wastewater treatment plants despite high energy cost associated with operation and maintenance (accounts 50% of the total annual operation cost). In recent years, the focus has been diverted to optimizing or reducing energy, and a microbubble generation without a saturator was developed and used in small treatment facilities because of its simple structure. Thus, in this study, DAF and low-energy flash-pressurized flotation (FPF) efficacies were investigated in a pilot plant based on organic precursors, different molecular weight (MW) fractions, and disinfection byproduct reduction. The organic fractions with different MW was analyzed by liquid chromatography-organic carbon detector. Both DAF (550 kPa) and FPF (300 kPa) showed similar removal of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and chromatographic DOC; however, the removal tendency of different MW fractions found was different. There was no significant difference in the removal of biopolymers, building blocks, and low molecular weight (LMW) neutrals for both DAF and FPF. Interestingly, the removal of LMW acids was found to be higher (93.8%) for DAF, whereas only 35.8% removal was observed for FPF. The total trihalomethanes concentration in a DAF-treated water sample was found to be 10% lower than that of FPF. Also, the reduction in haloacetonitriles was found to be slightly higher for a water sample treated by using DAF than by using FPF (1.5 and 1.8 mu g L-1, respectively). Moreover, the formation of chloral hydrate was observed to be the same (1.9 mu g L-1) for DAF- and FPF-treated water, with a total reduction of 40.6%. FPF with low pressure enabled a reduction in energy of around 55% when compared with DAF. Thus, FPF with low-pressure energy provides an alternative to DAF by reducing the annual operation cost and carbon footprint.
