Clinical characteristics of renal transplant recipients that underwent urologic surgery for de novo disease before and after transplantation

被引:1
|
作者
Bae, KS
Huh, JS
Kim, YJ
Chang, SG
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Seoul 130702, South Korea
[2] Cheju Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Cheju, South Korea
关键词
kidney transplantation; urology; abnormalities; urologic surgical procedures;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2005.20.1.75
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The pre-transplantation goal of the urologist is the optimization of urinary tract condition. Therefore, urologic surgery may be needed before or after renal transplantation. We analyzed the results of urologic surgery performed because of de novo urologic diseases. Between January 1986 and January 2001, 281 patients underwent renal transplantation, and 23 urologic surgical procedures were performed on 21 transplant recipients before or after renal transplantation because of de novo urologic diseases. By review the major reasons for urologic surgery in recipients were polycystic kidney diseases, vesicoureteral reflux, and dysfunctional voiding disorders. Nineteen surgical corrective procedures were done average 2.9 months before transplantation. The mortality rate was 10.5%. Four patients underwent urologic surgery at an average 57.5 months after transplantation. We highlight the fact that patients with uremia are vulnerable to surgical complications, and conclude that more intensive long-term urologic follow-ups should be conducted on recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 78
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] De Novo Urologic Malignancies in Renal Transplant Recipients
    Antunes, H.
    Tavares-da-Silva, E.
    Oliveira, R.
    Carvalho, J.
    Parada, B.
    Bastos, C.
    Figueiredo, A.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (05) : 1348 - 1354
  • [2] Development of Urologic de Novo Malignancies After Renal Transplantation
    Hevia, V.
    Gomez, V.
    Diez Nicolas, V.
    Alvarez, S.
    Gomez del Canizo, C.
    Galeano, C.
    Gomis, A.
    Garcia-Sagredo, J. M.
    Marcen, R.
    Burgos, F. J.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2014, 46 (01) : 170 - 175
  • [3] De novo urethral stricture disease in renal transplant recipients
    Wong, Julie
    Keyes, Sarah
    Harriman, David
    Nguan, Christopher
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (10): : 346 - 352
  • [4] EVEROLIMUS IN DE NOVO RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    Prokopenko, E. I.
    VESTNIK TRANSPLANTOLOGII I ISKUSSTVENNYH ORGANOV, 2010, 12 (02): : 74 - 81
  • [5] De novo breast cancer in renal transplant recipients
    Buell, JF
    Hanaway, MJ
    Trofe, J
    Gross, TG
    Beebe, TM
    Alloway, RR
    First, MR
    Woodle, ES
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (05) : 1778 - 1779
  • [6] Bone biomarkers in de novo renal transplant recipients
    Evenepoel, Pieter
    Cavalier, Etienne
    D'Haese, Patrick C.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2020, 501 : 179 - 185
  • [7] Characteristics of de novo cancer in liver transplant recipients
    Riis, Tine Holm
    Moller, Dina Leth
    Hogh, Julie
    Knudsen, Andreas Dehlbaek
    Rostved, Andreas Arendtsen
    Akdag, Delal
    Kirkby, Nikolai
    Lassen, Ulrik
    Rasmussen, Allan
    Hillingso, Jens G.
    Pommergaard, Hans-Christian
    APMIS, 2023, 131 (04) : 135 - 141
  • [8] Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Renal Transplant Recipients After Abdominal Surgical Procedures Not Connected With Transplantation
    Lederer, Ann-Kathrin
    Haffa, Dominic
    Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan
    Martini, Verena
    Makowiec, Frank
    Kousoulas, Lampros
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 : S554 - S554
  • [9] UROLOGIC EVALUATION AND OUTCOMES BEFORE AND AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION
    Cao, David
    Esterquest, Robert
    Lee, Melissa
    Adelstein, Sarah
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2021, 40 : S191 - S192
  • [10] A clinical experience with Gengraf™ (Abbott cyclosporine) in de novo renal transplant recipients.
    Scandling, J
    Rajagopalan, PR
    Magee, J
    Conti, D
    Mendez, R
    Bronson, D
    Awni, W
    Nabulsi, A
    Hoffman, R
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (08) : S161 - S161