Technologically-advanced assessment of upper-limb spasticity: a pilot study

被引:14
|
作者
Posteraro, Federico [1 ,2 ]
Crea, Simona [3 ]
Mazzoleni, Stefano [2 ,3 ]
Berteanu, Mihai [4 ]
Ciobanu, Ileana [5 ]
Vitiello, Nicola [3 ,6 ]
Cempini, Marco [3 ,7 ]
Gervasio, Sabata [8 ]
Mrachacz-Kersting, Natalie [8 ]
机构
[1] Versilia Hosp AUSL Toscana Nord Ovest, Dept Rehabil, Camaiore, LU, Italy
[2] Auxilium Vitae Rehabil Ctr, Bioengn Rehabil Lab, Pisa, Italy
[3] Scuola Super Sant Anna, BioRobot Inst, Pisa, Italy
[4] Univ Med & Pharm Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
[5] Univ Hosp Elias, Rehabil Res, Bucharest, Romania
[6] Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundaton, Florence, Italy
[7] Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL USA
[8] Aalborg Univ, Ctr Sensory Motor Interact SMI, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Rehabilitation; Robotics; Upper extremity; Muscle spasticity; Outcome and process assessment (health care); SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; STROKE; ANKLE; STIFFNESS; WRIST;
D O I
10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04815-8
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a muscle disorder associated with upper motor neuron syndrome occurring in neurological disorders, such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury and others. It influences the patient's rehabilitation, interfering with function, limiting independence, causing pain and producing secondary impairments, such as contractures or other complications. Due to the heterogeneity of clinical signs of spasticity, there is no agreement on the most appropriate assessment and measurement modality for the evaluation of treatment outcomes. AIM: The aim of this article is to propose the use of new robotic devices for upper-limb spasticity assessment and describe the most relevant measures of spasticity which could be automatically assessed by using a technologically advanced device. DESIGN: Observational pilot study. SETTING: The treatment was provided in a Rehabilitation Centre where the device was located and the subjects were treated in an outpatients setting. POPULATION: Five post-stroke patients, age range 19-79 years (mean age 61, standard deviation [SD]+/- 25) in their chronic phase. METHODS: A new robotic device able to automatically assess upper-limb spasticity during passive and active mobilization has been developed. The elbows pasticity of five post stroke patients has been assessed by using the new device and by means of the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). After the first assessment, subjects were treated with botulin toxin injections, and then underwent 10 sessions of robotic treatments. After the treatment, subjects spasticity was assessed by using the robotic device and the MAS Score. RESULTS: In four out of five patients, the botulin toxin injection and robotic treatment resulted in the improvement of the MAS Score; in three patients the robotic measures were able to detect the MAS changes. In one subject botulin toxin was not effective and the robotic device was able to detect the lack of effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: By using the robotic device some spasticity parameters can be continuously recorded during the rehabilitation treatment in order to objectively measure the effectiveness of the interventions provided. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The standardized evaluation parameters recorded using robotic devices may provide several advantages: 1) the measures for spasticity assessment can be monitored during every rehabilitation session (even during each movement); 2) these measurements are able to highlight even small changes; 3) the recovery plateau can be detected early thus avoiding further rehabilitation sessions; and 4) these measurements can reduce the assessment bias in multicenter studies.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 544
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigation of the Kinematic Upper-Limb Movement Assessment (KUMA): A Pilot Study
    Eftekhar, Parvin
    Li, Michael H.
    Semple, Mark Joseph
    Richardson, Denyse
    Brooks, Dina
    Mochizuki, George
    Dutta, Tilak
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, 2022, 74 (03) : 316 - 323
  • [2] Evaluation of upper-limb spasticity after stroke: A clinical and neurophysiologic study
    Pizzi, A
    Carlucci, G
    Falsini, C
    Verdesca, S
    Grippo, A
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (03): : 410 - 415
  • [3] Novel assessment measures of upper-limb function in pre and poststroke rehabilitation: a pilot study
    Appel, V. C. R.
    Garcia, R. E.
    Chiqueti, G. R.
    Pedro, L. M.
    Cruz, D. M. C.
    Caurin, G. A. P.
    [J]. 2018 7TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS (BIOROB2018), 2018, : 479 - 483
  • [4] Upper-limb functional assessment after stroke using mirror contraction: A pilot study
    Zhou, Yu
    Zeng, Jia
    Jiang, Hongze
    Li, Yang
    Jia, Jie
    Liu, Honghai
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 106
  • [5] Acupuncture in the treatment of upper-limb lymphedema Results of a Pilot Study
    Cassileth, Barrie R.
    Van Zee, Kimberly J.
    Yeung, K. Simon
    Coleton, Marci I.
    Cohen, Sara
    Chan, Yi H.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Hudis, Clifford A.
    [J]. CANCER, 2013, 119 (13) : 2455 - 2461
  • [6] Wrist autonomy based on upper-limb synergy: a pilot study
    Chunhao Peng
    Dapeng Yang
    Zhe Ge
    Hong Liu
    [J]. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2023, 61 : 1149 - 1166
  • [7] Wrist autonomy based on upper-limb synergy: a pilot study
    Peng, Chunhao
    Yang, Dapeng
    Ge, Zhe
    Liu, Hong
    [J]. MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2023, 61 (05) : 1149 - 1166
  • [8] Treatment with botulinum toxin type B for upper-limb spasticity
    Brashear, A
    McAfee, AL
    Kuhn, ER
    Ambrosius, WT
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (01): : 103 - 107
  • [9] Brachial plexus dorsal rhizotomy in the treatment of upper-limb spasticity
    Bertelli, JA
    Ghizoni, MF
    Michels, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 93 (01) : 26 - 32
  • [10] Treatments for upper-limb post-stroke spasticity: A critical evaluation
    Olvey, E. L.
    Grizzle, A. J.
    Armstrong, E. P.
    Shah, M., V
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : A269 - A269