Where should special attention be paid in undergraduate medical education? Two surveys among Finnish doctors

The study focuses on Finnish doctors' views of their undergraduate medical education. In 1988, a study (Junior Physician 88 Study) involving all the doctors registered during the years 1977-1986 in Finland (n = 5208) was carried out. A questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 2632 doctors, and after two mailings 1745 questionnaires (66 . 3%) were returned. A total of 1334 gave at least one answer to the question: 'Where should special attention be paid in undergraduate medical education?' Five years later, in 1993, another study (Physician 93 Study) involving all medical doctors registered in Finland during the years 1982-1991 (n = 4671) was carried out. The same questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 2332 doctors, and after two reminders 1818 questionnaires (78 . 0%) were returned, and 1228 doctors also answered the open-ended question. Content analysis was used to analyse the answers qualitatively and quantitatively. About 90% of the answers could be classified into two main categories: practical skills and evaluation of subjects. The most common proposal for the improvement of undergraduate medical education was that the practical skills needed in general practice should be taught. More education in administration and health economics was also desired. Respondents said that preclinical and clinical studies should be more closely integrated. In answers to the open question, the course in public health was strongly criticized for being too theoretical. Learning of the core knowledge for medical practice was considered essential.