Motivations to Pursue Physical Therapy Residency Training: A Q-Methodology Study of Stakeholder Perspectives

被引:7
|
作者
Osborne, Raine [1 ,2 ]
Janson, Chris [3 ]
Black, Lisa [4 ]
Jensen, Gail M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Brooks Rehabil Inst Higher Learning, 3901 Univ Blvd South,Suite 103, Jacksonville, FL 32216 USA
[2] Univ North Florida, Brooks Coll Hlth, Phys Therapy Program, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[3] Univ North Florida, Coll Educ & Human Serv, Jacksonville, FL USA
[4] Creighton Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
[5] Creighton Univ, Sch Pharm & Hlth Profess, Dept Phys Therapy, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2020年 / 100卷 / 01期
关键词
PHARMACY STUDENTS; EXCELLENCE; INNOVATION; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/pzz142
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Residency training is recognized as a valuable form of professional development and pathway to specialization. Currently residency is voluntary for physical therapists, with less than 12% of DPT students choosing to apply upon graduation. Motivations that drive the decision to pursue residency are currently unknown as is the extent of similarity and difference in perspective among various stakeholders. Objective. The purpose of this study was to identify the dominant perspectives on motivations to pursue residency held by various stakeholders. Design. This study was conducted using Q Methodology, which incorporates aspects of quantitative and qualitative techniques into the examination of human subjectivity. Methods. Program directors, faculty, and current residents from all accredited physical therapy residency programs were invited to complete a forced-choice sorting activity where potential motivations for residency were sorted by perceived level of importance. Principal component analysis was used to identify dominant perspectives, which were interpreted based on emergent themes in the cluster of motivations identified as most important. Results. Four dominant perspectives were identified: (1) desire to provide better patient care, (2) preparation for specialty practice, (3) fast track to expert practice, and (4) career advancement. These perspectives provided context and utility to 2 broad meta-motivations: improved clinical reasoning and receiving mentoring. Both within- and between-group differences among stakeholders were identified. However, subsets from each role-group population were found to share similar perspectives. Limitations. Results from this study may not apply to potential residents in all specialty areas, and the implications of having a particular perspective are unknown. Conclusions. Identification of the dominant perspective on motivations for pursuing residency may aid in promoting participation, program development, matching residents to programs and mentors, and future research.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 72
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stakeholder perspectives on payment reform in maternity care in the Netherlands: A Q-methodology study
    Scheefhals, Zoe T. M.
    de Vries, Eline F.
    Struijs, Jeroen N.
    Numans, Mattijs E.
    van Exel, Job
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2024, 340
  • [2] Using Q-methodology to understand stakeholder perspectives on a carnivore translocation
    Bavin, David
    MacPherson, Jenny
    Denman, Huw
    Crowley, Sarah L.
    McDonald, Robbie A.
    [J]. PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2020, 2 (04) : 1117 - 1130
  • [3] Factors contributing to abandonment of household biogas digesters in rural China: a study of stakeholder perspectives using Q-methodology
    Xie, Meiying
    Cai, Xiang
    Xu, Zhengli
    Zhou, Nan
    Yan, Dongqing
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (06) : 7698 - 7724
  • [4] Factors contributing to abandonment of household biogas digesters in rural China: a study of stakeholder perspectives using Q-methodology
    Meiying Xie
    Xiang Cai
    Zhengli Xu
    Nan Zhou
    Dongqing Yan
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 7698 - 7724
  • [5] Doctors and patients' perspectives on obesity. A Q-methodology study
    Shahed, Qays
    Baranowska, Karolina
    Galavazi, Marije C.
    Cao, Yang
    van Nieuwenhoven, Michiel A.
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2022, 39 (04) : 694 - 700
  • [6] Mining and linkages for economic transformation: Revealing multi-stakeholder perspectives through Q-methodology
    Weldegiorgis, Fitsum S.
    Dietsche, Evelyn
    Franks, Daniel M.
    Cust, James
    Ahmad, Shabbir
    [J]. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 12
  • [7] Key actor perspectives on stakeholder engagement in Omani Environmental Impact Assessment: an application of Q-Methodology
    Cotton, Matthew David
    Mahroos-Alsaiari, Ahmed A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 58 (01) : 91 - 112
  • [8] Disclosure in therapy by clients with eating difficulties: a Q-Methodology study
    Murphy, Karen
    Simonds, Laura M.
    Spokes, Naomi
    [J]. EATING DISORDERS, 2020, 28 (01) : 32 - 46
  • [9] Perspectives on Closure and Revitalisation of Extraction Sites and Sustainability: A Q-Methodology Study
    Streit, Stefanie
    Tost, Michael
    Gugerell, Katharina
    [J]. RESOURCES-BASEL, 2023, 12 (02):
  • [10] Perspectives of the Value in Life among Nursing Professionals: A Q-methodology Study
    Jeon, Misoon
    Jang, Eun Sil
    Yeun, Eun Ja
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):