Factors affecting the conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis undergoing ERCP due to choledocholithiasis

被引:1
|
作者
Cinar, Hamza [1 ]
Ozbalci, Gokhan S. [2 ]
Tarim, Ismail A. [2 ]
Karabulut, Kagan [2 ]
Kesicioglu, Tugrul [3 ]
Polat, Ayfer K. [2 ]
Erzurumlu, Kenan [2 ]
Derebey, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Ordu Univ, Med Fac, Gen Surg Dept, Ordu, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Med Fac, Gen Surg Dept, Samsun, Turkey
[3] Giresun Univ, Med Fac, Gen Surg Dept, Giresun, Turkey
关键词
Choledocholitiasis; Conversion; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; COMMON BILE-DUCT; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; BILIARY PANCREATITIS; RISK-FACTORS; SPHINCTEROTOMY; STONES; POLICY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The rate of conversion to open surgery is high in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreotocography (ERCP). The present study aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with the conversion to open cholecystectomy and minimize the rate of conversion to open surgery. METHODS: A total of 157 patients admitted to the Ondokuz Mays University Medical Faculty Hospital due to cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis between January 2002 and December 2012, and they receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study. The patients were analyzed retrospectively. The predictive factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy were evaluated. Patients were compared to each other in terms of time passing from ERCP to operation, number of ERCPs, stent usage, stone extraction and complications that occurred while waiting for the operation. Patients were separated into three groups according to the time passing from ERCP to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, as follows; group I (short time intervals: 7 days or less): 53 patients, group II (intermediate time intervals: 8-42 days): 70 patients and group III (long time intervals: 43 days and more): 34 patients. RESULTS: Of the 157 patients, 57 were male and 100 were female. The mean age was 54.5 (range: 19-87) years. Of these 157 patients who received laparoscopic cholecystectomy following ERCI? 22 (14%) underwent open surgery. The conversion to open cholecystectomy was distributed in groups, as follows: seven (13.2%) patients in group I, eight (11.4%) patients in group II and seven (20.6%) patients in group III. When the rate of conversion to open surgery was compared between groups, there was no statistically significant difference (p=0.406). The laparoscopic operations were converted to open surgery in 15 (11.3%) of the 133 patients who underwent single ERCIP, and in seven (29.2%) of the 24 patients who underwent two or more ERCPs before surgery (p=0.048). The number of ERCPs was determined to be the most important factor that affects the conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomies following ERCP. The removal of stones from the common bile duct, stent placement in the common bile duct, and existence of biliary complications during waiting time from ERCP to LC had no effect on the conversion to open surgery (p=0.454, p=0.058, and p=0.465, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reveal that the timing of LC following ERCIP, removal of stones from the common bile duct, stent placement in the common bile duct and the existence of biliary complications during the waiting period have no effect on the rate of conversion to open surgery. The number of ERCPs is the only factor that affects the conversion to open surgery in LC following ERCP.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors affecting conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery
    Liu, CL
    Fan, ST
    Lai, ECS
    Lo, CM
    Chu, KM
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1996, 131 (01) : 98 - 101
  • [2] Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Ibrahim, Salleh
    Hean, Tay Khoon
    Ho, Lim Swee
    Ravintharan, T.
    Chye, Tan Ngian
    Chee, Chng Hong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 30 (09) : 1698 - 1704
  • [3] Risk Factors for Conversion to Open Surgery in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Salleh Ibrahim
    Tay Khoon Hean
    Lim Swee Ho
    T. Ravintharan
    Tan Ngian Chye
    Chng Hong Chee
    World Journal of Surgery, 2006, 30 : 1698 - 1704
  • [5] Predictive Factors for Conversion to Open Surgery in Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Ercan, Metin
    Bostanci, E. Birol
    Teke, Zafer
    Karaman, Kerem
    Dalgic, Tahsin
    Ulas, Murat
    Ozer, Ilter
    Ozogul, Yusuf B.
    Atalay, Fuat
    Akoglu, Musa
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 20 (05): : 427 - 434
  • [6] RISK FACTORS AFFECTING CONVERSION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    Zhang, Wei-Jie
    Li, Jie-Ming
    Wu, Guo-Zhong
    Luo, Kun-Lun
    Dong, Zhi-Tao
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 78 (11) : 973 - 976
  • [7] Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis
    Min, Gao
    Wen, Zhou
    Jian-ming, Shi
    De-fei, Hong
    Yi-ping, Mu
    Jian-guo, Wang
    Yao-dong, Wang
    Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A, 2000, 1 (04): : 456 - 458
  • [8] Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Lim, Kok-Ren
    Ibrahim, Salleh
    Tan, Ngian-Chye
    Lim, Swee-Ho
    Tay, Khoon-Hean
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2007, 36 (08) : 631 - 635
  • [9] Assessment Of Predictive Factors Determining Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy In Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Janugade, Satyajeet
    Kshirsagar, A. Y.
    Janugade, H. B.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL NEGATIVE RESULTS, 2022, 13 : 392 - 395
  • [10] FACTORS AFFECTING CONVERSION OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN SOUTH INDIA
    Kumar, N. Suresh
    Balamuragan, R.
    Zakkaria, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (04): : 256 - 261