Database quality assessment in research in paramedicine: a scoping review protocol

被引:2
|
作者
McDonald, Neil [1 ,2 ]
Kriellaars, Dean [3 ]
Doupe, Malcolm [4 ]
Giesbrecht, Gordon [5 ]
Pryce, Rob T. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Appl Hlth Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] Winnipeg Fire Paramed Serv, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Coll Rehabil Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[4] Univ Manitoba, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[5] Univ Manitoba, Fac Kinesiol & Recreat Management, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[6] Univ Winnipeg, Kinesiol & Appl Hlth, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 07期
关键词
accident & emergency medicine; statistics & research methods; epidemiology; HEALTH RECORD DATA; RESEARCH AGENDA;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063372
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The paramedic practice environment presents unique challenges to data documentation and access, as well as linkage to other parts of the healthcare system. Variable or unknown data quality can influence the validity of research in paramedicine. A number of database quality assessment (DQA) frameworks have been developed and used to evaluate data quality in other areas of healthcare. The extent these or other DQA practices have been applied to paramedic research is not known. Accordingly, this scoping review aims to describe the range, extent and nature of DQA practices within research in paramedicine. Methods and analysis This scoping review will follow established methods for the conduct (Johanna Briggs Institute; Arksey and O'Malley) and reporting (Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews) of scoping reviews. In consultation with a professional librarian, a search strategy was developed representing the applicable population, concept and context. This strategy will be applied to MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine), Embase (Elsevier), Scopus (Elsevier) and CINAHL (EBSCO) to identify studies published from 2011 through 2021 that assess paramedic data quality as a stated goal. Studies will be included if they report quantitative results of DQA using data that relate primarily to the paramedic practice environment. Protocols, commentaries, case studies, interviews, simulations and experimental data-processing techniques will be excluded. No restrictions will be placed on language. Study selection will be performed by two reviewers, with a third available to resolve conflicts. Data will be extracted from included studies using a data-charting form piloted and iteratively revised based on studies known to be relevant. Results will be summarised in a chart of study characteristics, DQA-specific outcomes and key findings. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required. Results will be submitted to relevant conferences and peer-reviewed journals.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Database quality assessment in research in paramedicine: a scoping review
    Mcdonald, Neil
    Little, Nicola
    Kriellaars, Dean
    Doupe, Malcolm B.
    Giesbrecht, Gordon
    Pryce, Rob T.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 31 (01):
  • [2] Database quality assessment in research in paramedicine: a scoping review
    Neil McDonald
    Nicola Little
    Dean Kriellaars
    Malcolm B. Doupe
    Gordon Giesbrecht
    Rob T. Pryce
    [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 31
  • [3] Altruism in Paramedicine: A Scoping Review
    Parker, Leigh
    Prior, Sarah J.
    Van Dam, Pieter J.
    Edwards, Dale G.
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [4] Teaching improvement science to paramedicine students: protocol for a systematic scoping review
    Robin Pap
    Louis Shabella
    Alan J. Morrison
    Paul M. Simpson
    David M. Williams
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 7
  • [5] Teaching improvement science to paramedicine students: protocol for a systematic scoping review
    Pap, Robin
    Shabella, Louis
    Morrison, Alan J.
    Simpson, Paul M.
    Williams, David M.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [6] Quality Assessment of Digital Health Applications: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Giebel, Godwin Denk
    Schrader, Nils Frederik
    Speckemeier, Christian
    Abels, Carina
    Boerchers, Kirstin
    Wasem, Jurgen
    Blase, Nikola
    Neusser, Silke
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (07):
  • [7] Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol
    de Oliveira, Dannielly Azevedo
    Medeiros, Joyanne de Souza
    Cabral, Beatriz Tavina Viana
    Lira Lisboa, Lilian
    Nobre, Thaiza Teixeira Xavier
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [8] Non-technical skills in paramedicine: A scoping review
    Bennett, Ryan
    Mehmed, Niall
    Williams, Brett
    [J]. NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 23 (01) : 40 - 52
  • [9] Dietary assessment methodology and reporting in Pacific Island research: a scoping review protocol
    Craven, Dana Louise
    Vogliano, Chris
    Horsey, Bridget
    Underhill, Steven
    Burkhart, Sarah
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (05) : 1157 - 1163
  • [10] The use of immersive simulation in paramedicine education: a scoping review
    Birtill, Michael
    King, James
    Jones, Donovan
    Thyer, Liz
    Pap, Robin
    Simpson, Paul
    [J]. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2023, 31 (04) : 2428 - 2443