Order Ethics: Bridging the Gap Between Contractarianism and Business Ethics

被引:17
|
作者
Luetge, Christoph [1 ]
Armbruester, Thomas [2 ]
Mueller, Julian [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Business Eth, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Marburg, Chair Management, Marburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hamburg, Dept Philosophy, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Business ethics; Constitutional economics; Contractarian business ethics (CBE); Contractualism; Liberalism; Political philosophy; ECONOMIC-APPROACH; SOCIAL CONTRACTS; EXTENDED MODEL; TIES; ACCOUNT; CSR;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-015-2977-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Contract-based approaches have been a focus of attention in business ethics. As one of the grand traditions in political philosophy, contractarianism is founded on the notion that we will never resolve deep moral disagreement. Classical philosophers like Hobbes and Locke, or recent ones like Rawls and Gaus, seek to solve ethical conflicts on the level of social rules and procedures. Recent authors in business ethics have sought to utilize contract-based approaches for their field and to apply it to concrete business dilemmas. However, the application of contractarianism to management contexts can cause difficulties. Our article discusses this conceptual problem of contractarian business ethics and presents the idea of order ethics as an alternative. Order ethics, as we argue, can make a difference by conceptually bridging the gap between contractarianism and business ethics.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 697
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条