Radiation awareness program for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy using Medstone lithotripters

被引:2
|
作者
Ugarte, RR [1 ]
Cass, AS [1 ]
机构
[1] Midwest Stone Management, Midwest Urol Stone Unit, Roseville, MN 55113 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.1998.12.223
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To determine the effectiveness of a radiation awareness program in reducing the radiation exposure to patients treated by a Medstone lithotripter, the exposure was calculated at the end of each extracorporeal shockwave (SWL) treatment using a table of measurements of the estimated entrance exposure rates 70 cm from the X-ray tube port. The results, related to stone size and patient weight, were distributed every month to each radiologic technologist, and a summary was sent regularly to the treating urologists. The doses before and after the introduction of the radiation awareness program were compared to determine the effectiveness of the program, and the chi-square test was used to determine statistical significance. The average calculated radiation exposure before and after introduction of the radiation awareness program was 16.39 rad and 8.26 rad, respectively, for patients with single renal stones; 17.31 rad and 9.02 rad, respectively, with single ureteral stones; 18.45 rad and 9.39 rad, respectively, with multiple renal stones; and 20.59 rad and 11.28 rad, respectively with multiple ureteral stones. These reductions in calculated radiation exposure were statistically significant only with multiple ureteral stones (P = 0.03). The only statistically significant differences in the stone-free rates, retreatment rates, and post-SWL secondary procedure rates before and after the introduction of the radiation awareness program were seen in the stone-free rates with single renal stones: 70% v 65%, respectively (P = 0.02); in the retreatment rates with single ureteral stones: 10% v 6%, respectively (P <.01); and in the post-SWL secondary procedure rates with single renal stones: 4% v 2%, respectively (P = 0.01), and single ureteral stones: 7% v 4%, respectively (P = 0.05). The radiation awareness program resulted in a 51% reduction in the estimated radiation exposure to patients during SWL using Medstone lithotripters.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 227
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones?
    Tiselius, Hans-Goran
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (02) : 249 - 255
  • [2] Extracorporeal piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: Are second-generation lithotripters obsolete?
    Virgili, G
    Mearini, E
    Micali, S
    Miano, R
    Vespasiani, G
    Porena, M
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (08) : 543 - 547
  • [3] MATCHED PAIR ANALYSIS OF THE MEDSTONE STS AND STORZ MODULITH SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPTERS
    Alanee, S.
    Ugarte, R.
    Monga, M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A103 - A103
  • [4] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    DAS, G
    BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1988, 42 (05) : 361 - 362
  • [5] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    WEBB, DR
    ABBOTT, MA
    KELLETT, MJ
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1985, 78 (12) : 1063 - 1064
  • [6] The Efficacy of Gated Versus Nongated Shockwave Lithotripsy Using the Medstone STS Lithotriptor
    Chichakli, Ramsey
    Basrawala, Zane
    Ross, Michael
    Turk, Thomas M. T.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (04) : 599 - 602
  • [7] Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) : 131 - 133
  • [8] CLINICALLY DIAGNOSED RENAL HEMORRHAGE AFTER EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY WITH DORNIER HM3 AND MEDSTONE LITHOTRIPTERS
    CASS, AS
    BROOKER, W
    DUTHOY, E
    LUNDBLAD, R
    POST, G
    RIVERS, T
    SKEMP, C
    WHANG, KJ
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1992, 6 (06) : 413 - 416
  • [9] AMBULATORY EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    NISONSON, I
    WITUS, WS
    MADORSKY, ML
    WEEMS, WS
    UROLOGY, 1986, 28 (05) : 381 - 384
  • [10] MOBILE EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    RAJAGOPAL, V
    BAILEY, MJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 67 (01): : 6 - 8