Treatment Mode Preferences in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Moving Toward Shared Decision-Making

被引:17
|
作者
Taylor, Peter C. [1 ]
Betteridge, Neil [2 ]
Brown, T. Michelle [3 ]
Woolcott, John C. [4 ]
Kivitz, Alan J. [5 ]
Zerbini, Cristiano [6 ]
Whalley, Diane [7 ]
Olayinka-Amao, Oyebimpe [3 ]
Chen, Connie [8 ]
Dahl, Palle [9 ]
de Leon, Dario Ponce [10 ]
Gruben, David [11 ]
Fallon, Lara [12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Botnar Res Ctr, Windmill Rd, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
[2] Neil Betteridge Associates, London, England
[3] RTI Hlth Solut, Patient Ctr Outcomes Assessment Grp, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[4] Pfizer Inc, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Patient & Hlth Impact, Collegeville, PA USA
[5] Altoona Ctr Clin Res, Duncansville, PA USA
[6] Ctr Paulista Invest Clin, Dept Rheumatol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[7] RTI Hlth Solut, Patient Ctr Outcomes Assessment Grp, Manchester, Lancs, England
[8] Pfizer Inc, Xeljanz Rheumatol Inflammat & Immunol Med Affairs, New York, NY USA
[9] Pfizer Inc, Med Affairs Int Developed Markets Inflammat & Imm, Ballerup, Denmark
[10] Pfizer Inc, Med Affairs Latin Amer, New York, NY USA
[11] Pfizer Inc, Stat Res & Data Sci Ctr, Groton, CT 06340 USA
[12] Pfizer Inc, Global Med Affairs, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
关键词
drug administration; patient perspective; qualitative research; surveys; PATIENT PREFERENCES; ETHNIC DISPARITIES; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S220714
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Current knowledge of the reasons for patients' preference for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment modes is limited. This study was designed to identify preferences for four treatment modes, and to obtain in-depth information on the reasons for these preferences. Patients and Methods: In this multi-national, cross-sectional, qualitative study, in-depth interviews were conducted with adult patients with RA in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Brazil. Patients' strength of preference was evaluated using a 100-point allocation task (0-100; 100=strongest) across four treatment modes: oral, self-injection, clinic-injection, and infusion. Qualitative descriptive analysis methods were used to identify, characterize, and summarize patterns found in the interview data relating to reasons for these preferences. Results: 100 patients were interviewed (female, 75.0%; mean age, 53.9 years; mean 11.6 years since diagnosis). Among the four treatment modes, oral administration was allocated the highest mean (standard deviation) preference points (47.3 [33.1]) and was ranked first choice by the greatest percentage of patients (57.0%), followed by self-injection (29.7 [27.7]; 29.0%), infusion (15.4 [24.6]; 16.0%), and clinic-injection (7.5 [14.1]; 2.0%). Overall, 56.0% of patients had a "strong" first-choice preference (ie, point allocation >= 70); most of these patients chose oral (62.5%) vs self-injection (23.2%), infusion (10.7%), or clinic-injection (3.6%). Speed and/or ease of administration were the most commonly reported reasons for patients choosing oral (52.6%) or self-injection (55.2%). The most common reasons for patients not choosing oral or self-injection were not wanting to take another pill (37.2%) and avoiding pain due to needles (46.5%), respectively. Conclusion: These data report factors important to patients regarding preferences for RA treatment modes. Patients may benefit from discussions with their healthcare professionals and/or patient support groups, regarding RA treatment modes, to facilitate shared decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 131
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment Modes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Moving Toward Shared Decision-Making
    Taylor, Peter C.
    Betteridge, Neil
    Brown, T. Michelle
    Woolcott, John
    Kivitz, Alan J.
    Zerbini, Cristiano A. F.
    Whalley, Diane
    Olayinka-Amao, Oyebimpe
    Chen, Connie
    Dahl, Palle
    Ponce de Leon, Dario
    Gruben, David
    Fallon, Lara
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 70
  • [2] Preferences of Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients in treatment decision-making
    Aoki, Akiko
    Suda, Akiko
    Nagaoka, Shouhei
    Takeno, Mitsuhiro
    Ishigatsubo, Yoshiaki
    Ashizawa, Tatsuto
    Ohde, Sachiko
    Takahashi, Osamu
    Ohbu, Sadayoshi
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 23 (05) : 891 - 896
  • [3] Treatment choices, preferences and decision-making by patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Chilton, Frances
    Collett, Raymond A.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL CARE, 2008, 6 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [4] Preferences for treatments to prevent rheumatoid arthritis in Canada and the influence of shared decision-making
    Mark Harrison
    Nick Bansback
    Magda Aguiar
    Cheryl Koehn
    Kam Shojania
    Axel Finckh
    Marie Hudson
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2020, 39 : 2931 - 2941
  • [5] Preferences for treatments to prevent rheumatoid arthritis in Canada and the influence of shared decision-making
    Harrison, Mark
    Bansback, Nick
    Aguiar, Magda
    Koehn, Cheryl
    Shojania, Kam
    Finckh, Axel
    Hudson, Marie
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 39 (10) : 2931 - 2941
  • [6] Shared Decision-Making for Inflammatory Arthritis Treatment Decisions: Preferences of Indigenous Patients
    Umaefulam, Valerie
    Fox, Terri-Lynn
    Barnabe, Cheryl
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 48 (07) : 1115 - 1115
  • [7] New galaxies in the universe of shared decision-making and rheumatoid arthritis
    Barton, Jennifer L.
    Decary, Simon
    CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 32 (03) : 273 - 278
  • [8] Preference phenotypes to facilitate shared decision-making in rheumatoid arthritis
    Fraenkel, Liana
    Nowell, W. Benjamin
    Michel, George
    Wiedmeyer, Carole
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2018, 77 (05) : 678 - 683
  • [9] Qualitative Exploration of Triangulated, Shared Decision-Making in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Binder-Finnema, Pauline
    Dzurilla, Kathryn
    Hsiao, Betty
    Fraenkel, Liana
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2019, 71 (12) : 1576 - 1582
  • [10] Japanese physicians' preferences for decision making in rheumatoid arthritis treatment
    Aoki, Akiko
    Ohbu, Sadayoshi
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2016, 10 : 107 - +