Structural decomposition of variations of carbon dioxide emissions for the United States, the European Union and BRIC

被引:25
|
作者
Sesso, Patricia Pompermayer [1 ]
Amancio-Vieira, Saulo Fabiano [1 ]
Zapparoli, Irene Domenes [1 ]
Sesso Filho, Umberto Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid,PR 445 Km 380, BR-86057970 Londrina, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Environment; Input-output; Emissions; Greenhouse effect;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119761
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The historical responsibility of the countries that have promoted the accumulation of carbon dioxide since the industrial revolution, mainly the United States, Russia and the European Union, and the responsibility of the increase in current emissions of emerging countries like Brazil, India and China, determine the moral duty to reduce and adapt their economies to solve the problem of climate change. Therefore, it is important to measure the variations in carbon dioxide emissions from these countries and the effort made to reduce them. The objective of the study was to decompose the variations of carbon dioxide emissions into technological and final demand effects using the input-output matrix of the United States, the European Union (EU, 27 countries), Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC). The results showed that the US and EU decreased their emissions respectively by 12.4% and 5.9%. The US achieved emission reductions mainly due to the intensity effect (sector's own emissions) while the EU by technology effect (production chain's emissions). It was caused by the adoption of new technologies and modifications of the energy matrix. Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) respectively increased their emissions by 13.3%; 2.9%; 68.5% and 121.5%. The BRIC showed efforts to adopt new technologies to reduce emissions. However, changes in the structure and volume of final demand caused positive and superior effects to the technological effects of increasing emissions, especially in India and China. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Explanatory Factors of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the European Union
    Balogh, Jeremias Mate
    Leitao, Nuno Carlos
    [J]. STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 124 (03): : 88 - 95
  • [2] INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS OF CARBON DIOXIDE IN UNITED STATES - A PROJECTION
    ROHRMAN, FA
    STEIGERW.BJ
    LUDWIG, JH
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1967, 156 (3777) : 931 - &
  • [3] On the nature and causes of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States
    Roach, T.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 20 (10) : 1023 - 1026
  • [4] Carbon dioxide emissions in the US economy - A structural decomposition analysis
    Casler, SD
    Rose, A
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 1998, 11 (3-4): : 349 - 363
  • [5] The United States and the European Union
    不详
    [J]. AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY INTERESTS, 2005, 27 (06) : 531 - 533
  • [6] The impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon dioxide emissions: a matrix completion analysis
    Biancalani, Francesco
    Gnecco, Giorgio
    Metulini, Rodolfo
    Riccaboni, Massimo
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [7] European union membership and CO2 emissions: A structural decomposition analysis
    de Araujo, Inacio Fernandes
    Jackson, Randall W.
    Neto, Amir B. Ferreira
    Perobelli, Fernando S.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2020, 55 : 190 - 203
  • [8] The role of renewable energy and carbon dioxide emissions on the ESG market in European Union
    Mohammed, Kamel Si
    Pata, Ugur Korkut
    Serret, Vanessa
    Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [9] Analysis of the carbon emissions trend in European Union. A decomposition and decoupling approach
    Bianco, Vincenzo
    Cascetta, Furio
    Nardini, Sergio
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 909
  • [10] Unequal unions? A comparative decomposition of income inequality in the European Union and United States
    Filauro, Stefano
    Parolin, Zachary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2019, 29 (04) : 545 - 563