Worst-case vulnerability assessment and mitigation model of urban utility tunnels

被引:18
|
作者
Ouyang, Min [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Chuang [1 ]
Wu, Shengyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Artificial Intelligence & Automat, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Artificial Intelligence & Automat, Key Lab Imaging Proc & Intelligence Control, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[3] State Grid Energy Res Inst, Beijing 102209, Peoples R China
关键词
Utility tunnels; Interdependencies; Urban infrastructure systems; Worst-case vulnerability; INTERDEPENDENT INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS; UNDERGROUND SPACE; NETWORK DESIGN; RESILIENCE; RISK; IDENTIFICATION; FRAMEWORK; RAILWAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2020.106856
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Constructing utility tunnels would bring new threats, among which the terrorist threat has been identified as the most serious one. Because utility tunnels increase geographical interdependencies among urban infrastructure systems (UISs), and attacking a tunnel segment could cause simultaneous failure of all its carried systems. This paper models the terrorist threat as worst-case failure, and formulates a tri-level mathematical model to assess and mitigate the worst-case vulnerability of urban utility tunnels that carry interdependent UISs. Exact solution of the model is obtained by a column-and-constraint generation based decomposition algorithm. Real utility tunnels that carry interdependent power and water systems in Tianjin Eco-city, China, are used to demonstrate the proposed approach. Results show that there exists a threshold value of the defense budget B-D. If B-D is less than that threshold, the utility tunnels greatly benefit the attacker and increase the power and water systems' worst-case vulnerability. If B-D is equal to that threshold, the utility tunnels almost do not affect the worst-case vulnerability. If B-D is larger than that threshold, the utility tunnels benefit the defender and reduce the worst-case vulnerability.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Worst-case expected utility
    Alon, Shiri
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 60 : 43 - 48
  • [2] Worst-case flow model of VL for worst-case delay analysis of AFDX
    Liu, Cheng
    Wang, Tong
    Zhao, Changxiao
    Xiong, Huagang
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 2012, 48 (06) : 327 - 328
  • [3] Results on worst-case performance assessment
    Packard, A
    Balas, G
    Liu, R
    Shin, JY
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2000 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2000, : 2425 - 2427
  • [4] Population and building vulnerability assessment by possible worst-case tsunami scenarios in Salinas, Ecuador
    Vera San Martin, Teresa
    Rodriguez Rosado, Gary
    Arreaga Vargas, Patricia
    Gutierrez, Leonardo
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2018, 93 (01) : 275 - 297
  • [5] Population and building vulnerability assessment by possible worst-case tsunami scenarios in Salinas, Ecuador
    Teresa Vera San Martín
    Gary Rodriguez Rosado
    Patricia Arreaga Vargas
    Leonardo Gutierrez
    Natural Hazards, 2018, 93 : 275 - 297
  • [6] Worst-Case Prediction using the Arrhenius Model
    Yu, Yangyang
    Chen, Felix
    ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2009 PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 69 - 71
  • [7] Worst-Case Learning under a Multifidelity Model
    Foucart, Simon
    Hengartner, Nicolas
    SIAM-ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, 2025, 13 (01): : 171 - 194
  • [8] Assessment of Energy Recovery Potential in Urban Underground Utility Tunnels: A Case Study
    Wei, Tong
    Fan, Mingyue
    Xu, Zijun
    Li, Weijun
    Gu, Zhaolin
    Luo, Xilian
    BUILDINGS, 2024, 14 (10)
  • [9] A parametric worst-case approach to fairness in cooperative games with transferable utility
    Istrate, Gabriel
    Bonchis, Cosmin
    THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2023, 940 : 189 - 205
  • [10] Worst-case performance: Assessment of switching overvoltage and mitigation for mass rapid transit system using genetic algorithm
    Chang, CS
    Jiang, WQ
    Elangovan, S
    2000 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY WINTER MEETING - VOLS 1-4, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 1289 - 1298