Fossil fuel subsidy reforms and their impacts on firms

被引:30
|
作者
Rentschler, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Kornejew, Martin [3 ,4 ]
Bazilian, Morgan [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Sustainable Resources, 14 Upper Woburn Pl, London WC1H 0NN, England
[2] Oxford Inst Energy Studies, 57 Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6FA, England
[3] Stockholm Univ, 10 Univ Vagen, S-11418 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Univ Kiel, 4 Christian Albrechts Platz, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[5] Columbia Univ, Ctr Global Energy Policy, 1255 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027 USA
[6] Royal Inst Technol, Brinellvagen 8, S-11428 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Fossil fuel subsidies; Reform; Firms; Competitiveness; Response measures; CAPITAL-ENERGY SUBSTITUTION; INTERFUEL SUBSTITUTION; FACTOR DEMAND; PASS-THROUGH; EFFICIENCY; PRODUCTIVITY; ELASTICITIES; METAANALYSIS; BARRIERS; POVERTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.036
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While the potential adverse effects of fossil fuel subsidy reform are well documented for households, the literature has largely ignored the effect of subsidy reform on firms' competitiveness. This paper discusses how firms are affected by, and respond to, energy price increases caused by subsidy reforms. It highlights that cost increases (both direct and indirect) do not necessarily reflect competitiveness losses, since firms have various ways to mitigate and pass on price shocks. This paper presents and discusses direct and indirect transmission channels for price shocks, and firms' response measures: absorbing cost shocks into profits, inter-fuel substitution, increasing energy and material efficiency, and passing on price increases. It argues that further micro-econometric studies using enterprise surveys are essential for quantifying the role of these mechanisms, and for designing policy measures that ensure that competitiveness losses due to subsidy reforms are minimised.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 623
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条