Geoscience and geotechnical engineering aspects of debris-flow hazard assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Dietrich, WE [1 ]
Sitar, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Geol & Geophys, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The results of recent studies of rainfall-induced pore pressures in potential debris now source areas show that positive pore pressures develop repeatedly during successive storms and, sometimes, even during a single storm. Failures occur when these pore pressure reach a critical level which depends on the hydrology, geometry, and soil conditions at the site. In particular, exfiltration from conductive bedrock into the soil mantle tends to generate local areas of destabilizing pore pressures. Stability analyses based on the results of isotropically and anisotropically consolidated undrained triaxial tests suggest that debris flows initiate in two stages: an initial movement under drained conditions, followed by undrained failure as a result of stress redistribution. This mechanism of failure is consistent with observed slow initial movement, followed by a rapid transformation to a viscous slurry, which is typical of debris flow failures. On a regional scale, debris flow hazard maps can be constructed using digital elevation data and variety of techniques ranging from simple correlations, to use of expert opinion, and to process-based modeling. The success of all these approaches depends strongly on the quality of the topographic data. A simple, essentially parameter free, model has been used in Pacific Northwest watersheds to delineate areas of debris hazard in order to reduce frequency of landsliding associated with timber harvesting. This model can be made more realistic if soil depth is predicted and used as part of a slope stability model which includes root strength.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:656 / 676
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Large scale debris-flow hazard assessment: a geotechnical approach and GIS modelling
    Delmonaco, G.
    Leoni, G.
    Margottini, C.
    Puglisi, C.
    Spizzichino, D.
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2003, 3 (05) : 443 - 455
  • [2] A FRAMEWORK FOR HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF DEBRIS-FLOW ACCUMULATION AREAS
    Le, M. H.
    Han, Q. W.
    Fang, C. M.
    Guan, J. Z.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (03): : 6255 - 6267
  • [3] Remote sensing of rainfall for debris-flow hazard assessment
    Wieczorek, GF
    Coe, JA
    Godt, JW
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 1257 - 1268
  • [4] PHOENIX DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARD ASSESSMENT: HOUSE LOCATION MATTERS
    Moore, Matthew
    Kraetz, Gregory
    Dorn, Ronald I.
    PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 33 (06) : 491 - 513
  • [5] A new method for debris-flow hazard assessment in alluvial fans
    Ceccarelli, C
    Napolitano, F
    Savi, F
    RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT II, 2003, 7 : 351 - 362
  • [6] A simplified numerical model for debris-flow hazard assessment: DEFLIMO
    Lenzi, MA
    D'Agostino, V
    Gregoretti, C
    Sonda, D
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 611 - 622
  • [7] Study on methodology and application of debris-flow hazard risk assessment
    Han, Y. S.
    Cui, P.
    Liu, H. J.
    Ge, Y. G.
    Su, F. H.
    Tan, R. Z.
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, 2007, : 399 - +
  • [8] Evaluation of approaches to calculate debris-flow parameters for hazard assessment
    Hurlimann, Marcel
    Rickenmann, Dieter
    Medina, Vicente
    Bateman, Allen
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2008, 102 (3-4) : 152 - 163
  • [9] Classification of debris-flow deposits for hazard assessment in alpine areas
    Bardou, E
    Ancey, C
    Bonnard, C
    Vulliet, L
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 799 - 808
  • [10] Geotechnical properties of debris-flow sediments and slurries
    Major, JJ
    Iverson, RM
    McTigue, DF
    Macias, S
    Fiedorowicz, BK
    DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION & ASSESSMENT, 1997, : 249 - 259