Sensitivity analysis of mesoscale simulations to physics parameterizations over the Belgian North Sea using Weather Research and Forecasting - Advanced Research WRF (WRF-ARW)

被引:2
|
作者
Vemuri, Adithya [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Buckingham, Sophia [1 ]
Munters, Wim [1 ]
Helsen, Jan [2 ]
van Beeck, Jeroen [1 ]
机构
[1] von Karman Inst Fluid Dynam, Dept Environm & Appl Fluid Dynam, Waterloosesteenweg 72, B-1640 Rhode St Genese, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Mech Engn, Blvd Plaine 2, B-1050 Ixelles, Belgium
[3] SIM Vzw, Technol Pk 48, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium
关键词
BOUNDARY-LAYER PARAMETERIZATIONS; WIND SIMULATION; MODEL; SCALE; MICROPHYSICS; SCHEMES; REPRESENTATION; PRECIPITATION; HISTORY;
D O I
10.5194/wes-7-1869-2022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model offers a multitude of physics parameterizations to study and analyze the different atmospheric processes and dynamics that are observed in the Earth's atmosphere. However, the suitability of a WRF model setup is known to be highly sensitive to the type of weather phenomena and the type and combination of physics parameterizations. A multi-event sensitivity analysis is conducted to identify general trends and suitable WRF physics setups for three extreme weather events identified to be potentially harmful for the operation and maintenance of wind farms located in the Belgian offshore concession zone. The events considered are Storm Ciara on 10 February 2020, a low-pressure system on 24 December 2020, and a trough passage on 27 June 2020. A total of 12 WRF simulations per event are performed to study the effect of the update interval of lateral boundary conditions and different combinations of physics parameterizations (planetary boundary layer, PBL; cumulus; and microphysics). Specifically, the update interval of ERAS lateral boundary conditions is varied between hourly and 3-hourly. Physics parameterizations are varied between three PBL schemes (Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi-Niino, MYNN; scale-aware Shin-Hong; and scale-aware Zhang), four cumulus schemes (Kain-Fritsch, Grell-Devenyi, scale-aware Grell-Freitas, and multi-scale Kain-Fritsch), and three microphysics schemes (WRF Single-Moment five-class scheme, WSMS; Thompson; and Morrison). The simulated wind direction and wind speed are compared qualitatively and quantitatively to operational supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) data. Overall, a definitive best-case setup common to all three events is not identified in this study. For wind direction and wind speed, the best-case setups are identified to employ scale-aware PBL schemes. These are most often driven by hourly update intervals of lateral boundary conditions as opposed to 3-hourly update intervals, although it is only in the case of Storm Ciara that significant differences are observed. Scale-aware cumulus schemes are identified to produce better results when combined with scale-aware PBL schemes, specifically for Storm Ciara and the trough passage cases. However, for the low-pressure-system case this trend is not observed. No clear trend in utilizing higher-order microphysics parameterization considering the combinations of WRF setups in this study is found in all cases. Overall, the combination of PBL, cumulus, and microphysics schemes is found to be highly sensitive to the type of extreme weather event. Qualitatively, precipitation fields are found to be highly sensitive to model setup and the type of weather phenomena.
引用
收藏
页码:1869 / 1888
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Analysis of Hurricane Irene's Wind Field Using the Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecast (WRF-ARW) Model
    Klausmann, Alfred M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 2 (01): : 33 - 45
  • [2] Passive-tracer modelling at super-resolution with Weather Research and Forecasting - Advanced Research WRF (WRF-ARW) to assess mass-balance schemes
    Fathi, Sepehr
    Gordon, Mark
    Chen, Yongsheng
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 16 (17) : 5069 - 5091
  • [3] Sensitivity Analysis and Validation of WRF-ARW Parameterizations for Potential Solar and Wind Energy Sources over Malaysia
    Adomako, Abigail Birago
    Yusup, Yusri
    Elsebakhi, Emad
    Jaafar, Mohd Hafiidz
    Ishak, Muhammad Izzuddin Syakir
    Hwee San, Lim
    Ahmad, And Mardiana Idayu
    [J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2024, 39 (12) : 1833 - 1847
  • [4] Mesoscale Simulation of a Very Heavy Rainfall Event over Mumbai, Using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model
    Kirtsaeng, Sukrit
    Chantara, Somporn
    Kreasuwun, Jiemjai
    [J]. CHIANG MAI JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2010, 37 (03): : 429 - 442
  • [5] Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) Sensitivity to Choice of Parameterization Options over Ethiopia
    Shiferaw, Andualem
    Tadesse, Tsegaye
    Rowe, Clinton
    Oglesby, Robert
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (08)
  • [6] Forecasting of flash floods over Wadi Watier - Sinai Peninsula using the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model
    El-Sammany, Moustafa S.
    [J]. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2010, 46 : 996 - 1000
  • [7] Medium frequency gravity wave characteristics obtained using Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model simulations
    Bindu, H. Hima
    Ratnam, M. Venkat
    Yesubabu, Viswanadhapalli
    Prasad, D. Hari
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2019, 182 : 119 - 129
  • [8] Sensitivity analysis of weather research and forecasting (WRF) model output variables to the thunderstorm lifecycle and its application
    Haibo Huang
    Caiyan Lin
    Yangquan Chen
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2022, 114 : 1967 - 1983
  • [9] Sensitivity analysis of weather research and forecasting (WRF) model output variables to the thunderstorm lifecycle and its application
    Huang, Haibo
    Lin, Caiyan
    Chen, Yangquan
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 114 (02) : 1967 - 1983
  • [10] High-resolution mesoscale wind-resource assessment of Fiji using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model
    Dayal, Kunal K.
    Bellon, Gilles
    Cater, John E.
    Kingan, Michael J.
    Sharma, Rajnish N.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 232