The development of cued versus contextual conditioning in a predictable and an unpredictable human fear conditioning preparation

被引:18
|
作者
Iberico, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Vansteenwegen, Debora [1 ]
Vervliet, Bram [1 ,3 ]
Dirikx, Trinette [1 ]
Marescau, Valerie [1 ]
Hermans, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louvain, Dept Psychol, Ctr Psychol & Learning & Behav Therapy, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Catholic Univ Peru, Dept Psychol, Lima, Peru
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
contextual fear; US-expectancy; human fear conditioning; unpredictability; startle modulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In this human fear conditioning study, the online development of conditioned US-expectancy to discrete cues and background contexts was measured in two groups. In the paired group (n = 30), the CS was systematically followed by an aversive shock (US). In the unpaired group (n = 30), CS and US were presented explicitly unpaired. Using US-expectancy ratings, we replicated the basic finding already illustrated in humans with startle modulation. In the paired group, the CS elicited more US-expectancy than the context, whereas in the unpaired group, the context elicited more US-expectancy than the CS. Interestingly, we also observed a trial-by-trial development of conditioning to the context in the unpaired group as indicated by a significant linear trend. This gradual development and the evidence for the role of US-expectancy in contextual fear add to the idea that cued and contextual fear rely on the same basic associative processes. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 600
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inbred strain variation in contextual and cued fear conditioning behavior
    Valerie J. Bolivar
    Owen Pooler
    Lorraine Flaherty
    [J]. Mammalian Genome, 2001, 12 : 651 - 656
  • [2] Inbred strain variation in contextual and cued fear conditioning behavior
    Bolivar, VJ
    Pooler, O
    Flaherty, L
    [J]. MAMMALIAN GENOME, 2001, 12 (08) : 651 - 656
  • [3] DIFFERENTIAL CONTRIBUTION OF AMYGDALA AND HIPPOCAMPUS TO CUED AND CONTEXTUAL FEAR CONDITIONING
    PHILLIPS, RG
    LEDOUX, JE
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 106 (02) : 274 - 285
  • [4] MK-801 disrupts acquisition of contextual fear conditioning but enhances memory consolidation of cued fear conditioning
    Gould, TJ
    McCarthy, MM
    Keith, RA
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04): : 287 - 294
  • [5] Cerebellar molecular layer interneurons are dispensable for cued and contextual fear conditioning
    Marshall-Phelps, Katy L. H.
    Riedel, Gernot
    Wulff, Peer
    Woloszynowska-Fraser, Marta
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [6] Cerebellar molecular layer interneurons are dispensable for cued and contextual fear conditioning
    Katy L. H. Marshall-Phelps
    Gernot Riedel
    Peer Wulff
    Marta Woloszynowska-Fraser
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [7] Cued and contextual fear conditioning in BTBR mice is improved with training or atomoxetine
    Stapley, Nathan W.
    Guarigia, Sara R.
    Chadman, Kathryn K.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2013, 549 : 120 - 124
  • [8] Dissociable roles for the hippocampus and the amygdala in human cued versus context fear conditioning
    Marschner, Andreas
    Kalisch, Raffael
    Vervliet, Bram
    Vansteenwegen, Debora
    Buechel, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (36): : 9030 - 9036
  • [9] REM sleep deprivation affects extinction of cued but not contextual fear conditioning
    Silvestri, AJ
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2005, 84 (03) : 343 - 349
  • [10] Effects of the beta-blocker propranolol on cued and contextual fear conditioning in humans
    Christian Grillon
    Jeremy Cordova
    Charles Andrew Morgan
    Dennis S. Charney
    Michael Davis
    [J]. Psychopharmacology, 2004, 175 : 342 - 352