Current situation of shared decision making in osteoporosis: A comprehensive literature review of patient decision aids and decision drivers

被引:4
|
作者
Nogues, Xavier [1 ]
Carbonell, Maria Cristina [2 ]
Canals, Laura [3 ]
Lizan, Luis [4 ,5 ,7 ]
Palacios, Santiago [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Invest Hosp del Mar IMIM, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Fragil & Envejecimiento Salu, Internal Med Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Atencio Primaria Barcelona, Dept Med, Grp GREMPAL,Inst Catala Salut ICS, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Amgen Europe, Dept Med, Risch Rotkreuz, Switzerland
[4] Outcomes 10, Dept Outcomes Res, Castellon Plana, Castellon de la Plana, Spain
[5] Univ Jaume 1, Dept Med, Castellon De Plana, Spain
[6] Inst Palacios Salud Mujer, Madrid, Spain
[7] Univ Jaume 1, Castellon de la Plana 12071, Edificio ESPAIT, Spain
关键词
osteoporosis; patient decision aids; review; share decision-making; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; DRUG-TREATMENT; PATIENTS PREFERENCES; CHOICE; SATISFACTION; MEDICATION; BISPHOSPHONATES; PERCEPTIONS; PERSISTENCE; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1002/hsr2.849
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background and AimsOsteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microstructural deterioration of bone tissues, resulting in bone fragility and increased fracture risk. It is the most common bone-related disease in the population. However, the proportion of patients who start treatment but discontinue it during the first year is very high (around 50%). Endeavors are made to promote patient participation in treatment by implementing patient decision aids (PDA), whose function is to help the patient make disease-related decisions. We aim to summarize the characteristics of the currently available PDA for osteoporosis, as well as deciding factors. MethodsComprehensive review of the literature. ResultsCurrently, eleven PDAs can be found for osteoporosis. These PDA have different characteristics or options such as information about treatments tailored to patient needs, graphic information of the results (to facilitate understanding), personal histories (learning), tests to check the knowledge acquired, provision of evidence, clinical practice guidelines or a final summary to share with their doctor. Only five of these PDAs can be considered complete since they provide relevant disease information and therapeutic options to the patient, promote patient's reflection and foment patient-physician discussion. ConclusionsThis study provides an update on the current state of decision making on osteoporosis and available PDA, which can help engage the patient through shared decision-making by considering, among other things, patient preferences. Physicians should consider PDA, as it may promote adherence and effectiveness of treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CURRENT SITUATION ON SHARED DECISION MAKING IN OSTEOPOROSIS: PATIENT DECISION AIDS AND DECISION DRIVERS
    Branas, F.
    Carbonell, C.
    Nogues, X.
    Comellas, M.
    De Paz, D.
    Canals, L.
    Brullet, M.
    Palacios, S.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 31 (SUPPL 1) : S469 - S469
  • [2] SHARED DECISION MAKING AND PATIENT DECISION AIDS
    Shaffer, Victoria
    Lipstein, Ellen
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 55 : S523 - S523
  • [3] Shared decision making and patient decision aids in dermatology
    Tan, J.
    Linos, E.
    Sendelweck, M. A.
    van Zuuren, E. J.
    Ersser, S.
    Dellavalle, R. P.
    Williams, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 175 (05) : 1045 - 1048
  • [4] Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids Is It Time?
    Sepucha, Karen R.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2012, 5 (03): : 247 - 248
  • [5] Erratum to: A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology
    Kristina DemasWoodhouse
    Katie Tremont
    Anil Vachani
    Marilyn M. Schapira
    Neha Vapiwala
    Charles B. Simone
    Abigail T. Berman
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2017, 32 : 246 - 246
  • [6] Decision aids, empowerment, and shared decision making
    Hargraves, Ian
    Montori, Victor M.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 349
  • [7] Decision aids and shared decision making in urogynecology
    Marques, Felisha
    Josloff, Kevan
    Hung, Kristin
    Wakamatsu, May
    Sepucha, Karen R.
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2022, 29 (02): : 178 - 183
  • [8] A Comprehensive Approach to Decision Aids Supporting Shared Decision Making in Cardiac Rehabilitation
    Bonneux, Cindel
    Rovelo, Gustavo
    Dendale, Paul
    Coninx, Karin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH EAI INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES FOR HEALTHCARE (PERVASIVEHEALTH 2019), 2019, : 389 - 398
  • [9] The impact of patient decision aids on the shared decision-making in cancer treatment
    Lin, Wan-Shiuan
    Yang, Yuan-Hao
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S490 - S490
  • [10] Value of patient decision aids for shared decision-making in kidney failure
    van der Sluijs, Anita van Eck
    Vonk, Sanne A.
    Bonenkamp, Anna A.
    Prantl, Karen T.
    Riemann, Aase T. C.
    van Jaarsveld, Brigit C. C.
    Abrahams, Alferso C.
    JOURNAL OF RENAL CARE, 2024, 50 (01) : 15 - 23