Air quality impacts of increased use of ethanol under the United States' Energy Independence and Security Act

被引:50
|
作者
Cook, Rich [1 ]
Phillips, Sharon [2 ]
Houyoux, Marc [2 ]
Dolwick, Pat [2 ]
Mason, Rich [2 ]
Yanca, Catherine [1 ]
Zawacki, Margaret [1 ]
Davidson, Ken [3 ]
Michaels, Harvey [1 ]
Harvey, Craig [1 ]
Somers, Joseph [1 ]
Luecken, Deborah [4 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Off Transportat & Air Qual, Natl Vehicle & Fuel Emiss Lab, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[2] US EPA, Off Air Qual Planning & Stand, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[3] US EPA, Off Transportat & Air Qual, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[4] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
Air quality; Modeling; Ethanol; Ozone; Air toxics; RIO-DE-JANEIRO; GASOLINE VEHICLES; SAO-PAULO; EMISSIONS; DEPENDENCE; PRODUCTS; E85;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.043
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increased use of ethanol in the United States fuel supply will impact emissions and ambient concentrations of greenhouse gases, "criteria" pollutants for which the U. S. EPA sets ambient air quality standards, and a variety of air toxic compounds. This paper focuses on impacts of increased ethanol use on ozone and air toxics under a potential implementation scenario resulting from mandates in the U. S. Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007. The assessment of impacts was done for calendar year 2022, when 36 billion gallons of renewable fuels must be used. Impacts were assessed relative to a baseline which assumed ethanol volumes mandated by the first renewable fuels standard promulgated by U. S. EPA in early 2007. This assessment addresses both impacts of increased ethanol use on vehicle and other engine emissions, referred to as "downstream" emissions, and "upstream" impacts, i.e., those connected with fuel production and distribution. Air quality modeling was performed for the continental United States using the Community Multi-scale Air Quality Model (CMAQ), version 4.7. Pollutants included in the assessment were ozone, acetaldehyde, ethanol, formaldehyde, acrolein, benzene, and 1,3-butadiene. Results suggest that increased ethanol use due to EISA in 2022 will adversely increase ozone concentrations over much of the U.S., by as much as 1 ppb. However, EISA is projected to improve ozone air quality in a few highly-populated areas that currently have poor air quality. Most of the ozone improvements are due to our assumption of increases in nitrogen oxides (NOx) in volatile organic compound (VOC)-limited areas. While there are some localized impacts, the EISA renewable fuel standards have relatively little impact on national average ambient concentrations of most air toxics, although ethanol concentrations increase substantially. Significant uncertainties are associated with all results, due to limitations in available data. These uncertainties are discussed in detail. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:7714 / 7724
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Air quality impacts of distributed energy resources implemented in the northeastern United States
    Carreras-Sospedra, Marc
    Dabdub, Donald
    Brouwer, Jacob
    Knipping, Eladio
    Kumar, Naresh
    Darrow, Ken
    Hampson, Anne
    Hedman, Bruce
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2008, 58 (07): : 902 - 912
  • [2] Ethanol fuel use in Brazil: air quality impacts
    Anderson, Larry G.
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2009, 2 (10) : 1015 - 1037
  • [3] Measuring energy security: Can the United States achieve oil independence?
    Greene, David L.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (04) : 1614 - 1621
  • [4] Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States
    Altshuler, Samuel L.
    Zhang, Qi
    Kleinman, Michael T.
    Garcia-Menendez, Fernando
    Moore, Charles Thomas
    Hough, Merlyn L.
    Stevenson, Eric D.
    Chow, Judith C.
    Jaffe, Daniel A.
    Watson, John G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2020, 70 (10) : 961 - 970
  • [5] Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States
    Jaffe, Daniel A.
    O'Neill, Susan M.
    Larkin, Narasimhan K.
    Holder, Amara L.
    Peterson, David L.
    Halofsky, Jessica E.
    Rappold, Ana G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2020, 70 (06) : 583 - 615
  • [6] Security, independence, and sustainability: Imprecise language and the manipulation of energy policy in the United States
    Littlefield, Scott R.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 52 : 779 - 788
  • [7] Dust Under the Radar: Rethinking How to Evaluate the Impacts of Dust Events on Air Quality in the United States
    Ardon-Dryer, K.
    Clifford, K. R.
    Hand, J. L.
    [J]. GEOHEALTH, 2023, 7 (12):
  • [8] Impacts of urban form on air quality in metropolitan areas in the United States
    Lee, Changyeon
    [J]. COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2019, 77
  • [9] Air Quality Impacts of Electrifying Vehicles and Equipment Across the United States
    Nopmongcol, Uarporn
    Grant, John
    Knipping, Eladio
    Alexander, Mark
    Schurhoff, Rob
    Young, David
    Jung, Jaegun
    Shah, Tejas
    Yarwood, Greg
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (05) : 2830 - 2837
  • [10] Air quality and human health impacts of grasslands and shrublands in the United States
    Gopalakrishnan, Varsha
    Hirabayashi, Satoshi
    Ziv, Guy
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 182 : 193 - 199