Projected outcomes of 6-month delay in exception points versus an equivalent Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score for hepatocellular carcinoma liver transplant candidates

被引:24
|
作者
Alver, Sarah K. [1 ]
Lorenz, Douglas J. [1 ]
Marvin, Michael R. [2 ]
Brock, Guy N. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Publ Hlth & Informat Sci, Dept Bioinformat & Biostat, 485 E Gray St, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Geisinger Med Ctr, Dept Transplantat & Liver Surg, Danville, PA 17822 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Ctr Biostat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
WAITING-LIST; MULTISTATE MODELS; DROPOUT ASSESSMENT; ALLOCATION; SURVIVAL; TIME; DISPARITY; SYSTEM; RATES;
D O I
10.1002/lt.24503
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) recently implemented a 6-month delay before granting exception points to liver transplantation candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to address disparity in transplantation access between HCC and non-HCC patients. An HCC-specific scoring scheme, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease equivalent (MELDEQ), has also been developed. We compared projected dropout and transplant probabilities and posttransplant survival for HCC and non-HCC patients under the 6-month delay and the MELDEQ using UNOS data from October 1, 2009, to June 30, 2014, and multistate modeling. Overall (combined HCC and non-HCC) wait-list dropout was similar under both schemes and slightly improved (though not statistically significant) compared to actual data. Projected HCC wait-list dropout was similar between the MELDEQ and 6-month delay at 6 months but thereafter started to differ, with the 6-month delay eventually favoring HCC patients (3-year dropout 10.0% [9.0%-11.0%] for HCC versus 14.1% [13.6%-14.6%]) for non-HCC) and the MELDEQ favoring non-HCC patients (3-year dropout 16.0% [13.2%-18.8%] for HCC versus 12.3% [11.9%-12.7%] for non-HCC). Projected transplant probabilities for HCC patients were substantially lower under the MELDEQ compared to the 6-month delay (26.6% versus 83.8% by 3 years, respectively). Projected HCC posttransplant survival under the 6-month delay was similar to actual, but slightly worse under the MELDEQ (2-year survival 82.9% [81.7%-84.2%] versus actual of 85.5% [84.3%-86.7%]). In conclusion, although the 6-month delay improves equity in transplant and dropout between HCC and non-HCC candidates, disparity between the 2 groups may still exist after 6 months of wait-list time. Projections under the MELDEQ, however, appear to disadvantage HCC patients. Therefore, modification to the exception point progression or refinement of an HCC prioritization score may be warranted. Liver Transplantation 22 1343-1355 2016 AASLD.
引用
收藏
页码:1343 / 1355
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes for liver transplant candidates listed with low model for end-stage liver disease score
    Kwong, Allison J.
    Lai, Jennifer C.
    Dodge, Jennifer L.
    Roberts, John P.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 21 (11) : 1403 - 1409
  • [2] Liver Transplant Waitlist Outcomes and the Allocation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Exception Points at a Low-Volume Center
    Tan, E. K.
    Goh, B. K. P.
    Lee, S. Y.
    Krishnamoorthy, T. L.
    Tan, C. K.
    Jeyaraj, P. R.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (10) : 3564 - 3570
  • [3] Delayed Hepatocellular Carcinoma Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Exception Score Improves Disparity in Access to Liver Transplant in the United States
    Heimbach, Julie K.
    Hirose, Ryutaro
    Stock, Peter G.
    Schladt, David P.
    Xiong, Hui
    Liu, Jiannong
    Olthoff, Kim M.
    Harper, Ann
    Snyder, Jon J.
    Israni, Ajay K.
    Kasiske, Bertram L.
    Kim, W. Ray
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 61 (05) : 1643 - 1650
  • [4] Liver transplantation in septuagenarians receiving model for end-stage liver disease exception points for hepatocellular carcinoma: The national experience
    Schwartz, Jason
    Thiesset, Heather
    Box, Terry
    Hutson, William
    Sorensen, John
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (11) : 1395 - 1396
  • [5] Liver transplantation in septuagenarians receiving model for end-stage liver disease exception points for hepatocellular carcinoma: The national experience
    Schwartz, Jason J.
    Pappas, Lisa
    Thiesset, Heather F.
    Vargas, Gabriela
    Sorensen, John B.
    Kim, Robin D.
    Hutson, William R.
    Boucher, Kenneth
    Box, Terry
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (04) : 423 - 433
  • [6] Natural history of liver transplant candidates listed with a low Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score
    Bari, Khurram
    Shah, Shimul
    Kaiser, Tiffany E.
    Ballinger, Brad
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 62 : 641A - 641A
  • [7] Living Donor Liver Transplant Versus Cadaveric Liver Transplant Survival in Relation to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score
    Al Sebayel, M.
    Abaalkhail, F.
    Hashim, A.
    Al Bahili, H.
    Alabbad, S.
    Shoukdy, M.
    Elsiesy, H.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2015, 47 (04) : 1211 - 1213
  • [8] Model of end stage liver disease score and hepatocellular carcinoma
    Shabana, H.
    Askar, M.
    Elrakhawy, M.
    Haras, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, 2015, 22 : 47 - 47
  • [9] MELDEQ: An Alternative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Marvin, Michael R.
    Ferguson, Nicole
    Cannon, Robert M.
    Jones, Christopher M.
    Brock, Guy N.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 21 (05) : 612 - 622
  • [10] Model for end-stage liver disease score predicts survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Contreras, C. M.
    Behrens, J.
    Cho, C. S.
    Mahvi, D. M.
    Rikkers, L. F.
    Weber, S. M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (02) : 96 - 96