Supporting a mathematics community of inquiry through online discussion forums: towards design principles

被引:9
|
作者
Padayachee, Pragashni
Campbell, Anita L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Acad Support Programme Engn, Private Bag X7, ZA-7700 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, Ctr Res Engn Educ, Private Bag X7, ZA-7700 Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
Discussion forum; vector calculus; mathematics; community of inquiry; active learning; online learning; blended learning; SOCIAL PRESENCE; ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; PARTICIPATION; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1080/0020739X.2021.1985177
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Recreating the social aspects of face-to-face teaching in an online environment became more challenging in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. With limited or no face-to-face interaction with students, lecturers had to explore alternative ways to recreate aspects of an engaging and supportive face-to-face learning environment. This article focuses on the use of online discussion forums through the lens of the Community of Inquiry (COI) framework to meaningfully engage a mathematics community of learning. The COI framework, comprising social, cognitive and teaching presences, has been widely applied to online learning. We investigate the question: 'How can online discussion forums support the development of a learning community in a fully online Vector Calculus course?' We do this through evaluating our online discussion forum as a COI and consequently recommend design principles. Data from engineering students taking Vector Calculus in an extended degree at a South African university includes interviews, surveys, discussion forum content, and learning platform analytics. Analysis of data using the COI framework shows that discussion forums contributed to social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence. Design principles and directions for further research are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 63
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Guidelines for Supporting a Community of Inquiry through Graded Online Discussion Forums in Higher Education
    Mudau, Patience Kelebogile
    van den Berg, Geesje
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [2] Perspectives on Critical Thinking through Online Discussion Forums in Engineering Mathematics
    Jacob, S. M.
    Sam, H. K.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN NETWORKING, EDUCATION AND AUTOMATION, 2010, : 121 - +
  • [3] Supporting mathematics educators through and towards online learning
    Marfuah, Marfuah
    Novita, Rita
    Danoebroto, Sri Wulandari
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS, 2023, 112 (02) : 383 - 395
  • [4] Measuring critical thinking in problem solving through online discussion forums in first year university mathematics
    Jacob, S. M.
    Sam, H. K.
    [J]. IMECS 2008: INTERNATIONAL MULTICONFERENCE OF ENGINEERS AND COMPUTER SCIENTISTS, VOLS I AND II, 2008, : 816 - 821
  • [5] Democracy, deliberation and design: The case of online discussion forums
    Wright, Scott
    Street, John
    [J]. NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2007, 9 (05) : 849 - 869
  • [6] Network Community Analysis Based Enhancement of Online Discussion Forums
    Krishnan, Soundarya
    Khincha, Rishab
    Goveas, Neena
    [J]. CODS-COMAD 2021: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD ACM INDIA JOINT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE & MANAGEMENT OF DATA (8TH ACM IKDD CODS & 26TH COMAD), 2021, : 438 - 438
  • [7] Action research to design a model for mediation in online discussion forums
    Miyashita, Hiroshi
    Wark, Norine
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2024, 52
  • [8] Supporting Teacher Reflection through Online Discussion
    Ruan, Jiening
    Griffith, Priscilla L.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT & E-LEARNING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2011, 3 (04) : 548 - 562
  • [9] Supporting traditional PBL with online discussion forums: A study from Qassim Medical School
    Alamro, Ahmad S.
    Schofield, Susie
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 : S20 - S24
  • [10] Peer Interaction and Engagement Through Online Discussion Forums: A Cautionary Tale
    Clarke, Sandra
    [J]. LIVERPOOL LAW REVIEW, 2011, 32 (02): : 149 - 163