Mapping soil organic matter concentration at different scales using a mixed geographically weighted regression method

被引:93
|
作者
Zeng, Canying [1 ,3 ]
Yang, Lin [2 ]
Zhu, A-Xing [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rossiter, David G. [1 ,5 ]
Liu, Jing [4 ]
Liu, Junzhi [1 ]
Qin, Chengzhi [2 ]
Wang, Desheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Normal Univ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Minist Educ, 1 Wenyuan Rd, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Ctr Collaborat Innovat Geog Informat Reso, 1 Wenyuan Rd, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Geog, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Sch Integrat Plant Sci, Sect Soil & Crop Sci, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Mixed geographically weighted regression (MGWR); Geographically weighted regression (GWR); Multiple linear regression (MLR); Soil organic matter concentration (SOM); MULTIPLE-LINEAR-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; CARBON; VARIABLES; PATTERNS; INFORMATION; SALINITY; REGION; VALLEY;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.06.033
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The present regression models in digital soil mapping usually assume that relationships between soil properties and environmental variables are always fixed (as in MLR) or varying (as in GWR) in geographical space. In reality, some of the environmental variables may be fixed in affecting soil property variation and some are local varying. In this study, a mixed geographically weighted regression (MGWR) method which can deal with fixed and varying spatial relationships between a target variable and its environmental variables were proposed and used to predict topsoil soil organic matter (SOM) concentration in two study areas (Heshan, Heilongjiang province and Xuancheng, Anhui province, China) at two scales. Three groups of sample sets were created based on the total samples in the study areas to evaluate the robustness and stability of the model. Multiple linear regression (MLR), geographically weighted regression (GWR), GWR-kriging (GWRK), local regression-kriging (LRK), kriging with an external drift (KED), and ordinary kriging (OK) were used for comparison with MGWR. The validation results showed that the use of MGWR reduced the RMSE of GWR by 10.5% and 7.6% on average, reduced the RMSE of MLR by 12.8% and 9.9% on average for Heshan and Xuancheng study areas respectively. MGWR also showed a good competitiveness when compared with GWRK, LRK, ICED and OK In Heshan study area, the influence of flow length, relative position index, foot slope and distance to the nearest drainage were constant, whereas the elevation, topographic wetness index and valley index showed different influence in different regions. In Xuancheng study area, the fixed environmental variables were profile curvature, topographic wetness index and slope, whereas the varying environmental variables were precipitation, temperature, elevation, and limestone. The results indicate that the accuracy of predictions can be improved by adaptive coefficient according to the variation of environmental variables as implemented in MGWR compared with others considering only the local or global relationships. It was concluded that mixed geographically weighted regression model could be a potential method for digital soil mapping. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 82
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping Soil Organic Carbon and Organic Matter Fractions by Geographically Weighted Regression
    Costa, Elias Mendes
    Tassinari, Wagner de Souza
    Koenow Pinheiro, Helena Saraiva
    Beutler, Sidinei Julio
    Cunha dos Anjos, Lucia Helena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2018, 47 (04) : 718 - 725
  • [2] Mapping soil organic matter with limited sample data using geographically weighted regression
    Wang, K.
    Zhang, C. R.
    Li, W. D.
    Lin, J.
    Zhang, D. X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPATIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 59 (01) : 91 - 106
  • [3] A geographically weighted regression kriging approach for mapping soil organic carbon stock
    Kumar, Sandeep
    Lal, Rattan
    Liu, Desheng
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2012, 189 : 627 - 634
  • [4] Comparison of Geographically Weighted Regression and Regression Kriging for Estimating the Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Matter
    Wang, Ku
    Zhang, Chuanrong
    Li, Weidong
    [J]. GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 49 (06) : 915 - 932
  • [5] SPATIAL MODELLING OF POPULATION CONCENTRATION USING GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION METHOD
    Bajat, Branislav
    Krunic, Nikola
    Kilibarda, Milan
    Samardzic-Petrovic, Mileva
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL INSTITUTE JOVAN CVIJIC SASA, 2011, 61 (03): : 151 - 167
  • [6] Soil apparent electrical conductivity and geographically weighted regression for mapping soil
    Terron, J. M.
    Marques da Silva, J. R.
    Moral, F. J.
    Garcia-ferrer, Alfonso
    [J]. PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2011, 12 (05) : 750 - 761
  • [7] Soil apparent electrical conductivity and geographically weighted regression for mapping soil
    J. M. Terrón
    J. R. Marques da Silva
    F. J. Moral
    Alfonso García-Ferrer
    [J]. Precision Agriculture, 2011, 12 : 750 - 761
  • [8] Predicting soil organic matter content in a plain-to-hill transition belt using geographically weighted regression with stratification
    Yang, Shunhua
    Zhang, Haitao
    Zhang, Chuanrong
    Li, Weidong
    Guo, Long
    Chen, Jiaying
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (12) : 1745 - 1757
  • [9] Effects of different sampling densities on geographically weighted regression kriging for predicting soil organic carbon
    Ye, Huichun
    Huang, Wenjiang
    Huang, Shanyu
    Huang, Yuanfang
    Zhang, Shiwen
    Dong, Yingying
    Chen, Pengfei
    [J]. SPATIAL STATISTICS, 2017, 20 : 76 - 91
  • [10] The application of a geographically weighted logistic regression for earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility mapping on different geographic scales
    Lin, Qigen
    Wang, Ying
    [J]. DEEP ROCK MECHANICS: FROM RESEARCH TO ENGINEERING, 2019, : 485 - 499