Machining-Based Coverage Path Planning for Automated Structural Inspection

被引:27
|
作者
Macleod, Charles Norman [1 ]
Dobie, Gordon [1 ]
Pierce, Stephen Gareth [1 ]
Summan, Rahul [1 ]
Morozov, Maxim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Glasgow G1 1XW, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Automated coverage path planning (CPP); automated nondestructive evaluation (NDE); automated robotic inspection; computer-aided drawing (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)-based path planning; ROBOT; NC; GENERATION; TERRAIN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/TASE.2016.2601880
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The automation of robotically delivered nondestructive evaluation inspection shares many aims with traditional manufacture machining. This paper presents a new hardware and software system for automated thickness mapping of large-scale areas, with multiple obstacles, by employing computer-aided drawing (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)-inspired path planning to implement control of a novel mobile robotic thickness mapping inspection vehicle. A custom postprocessor provides the necessary translation from CAM numeric code through robotic kinematic control to combine and automate the overall process. The generalized steps to implement this approach for any mobile robotic platform are presented herein and applied, in this instance, to a novel thickness mapping crawler. The inspection capabilities of the system were evaluated on an indoor mock-inspection scenario, within a motion tracking cell, to provide quantitative performance figures for positional accuracy. Multiple thickness defects simulating corrosion features on a steel sample plate were combined with obstacles to be avoided during the inspection. A minimum thickness mapping error of 0.21 mm and a mean path error of 4.41 mm were observed for a 2 m(2) carbon steel sample of 10-mm nominal thickness. The potential of this automated approach has benefits in terms of repeatability of area coverage, obstacle avoidance, and reduced path overlap, all of which directly lead to increased task efficiency and reduced inspection time of large structural assets. Note to Practitioners-Current industrial robotic inspection approaches largely consist of a manual control of robotic platform motion to desired points, with the aim of producing a number of straight scans for larger areas, often spaced meters apart. The structures featuring large surface area and multiple obstacles are routinely inspected with such manual approaches, which are both labor intensive and error prone, and do not guarantee acquisition of full area coverage. The presented system addresses these limitations through a combined hardware and software approach. Core to the operation of the system is a fully wireless, differential drive crawler with integrated active ultrasonic wheel probe, to provide remote thickness mapping. Automation of the path generation algorithms is produced using the commercial CAD/CAM software algorithms, and this paper sets out an adaptable methodology for producing a custom postprocessor to convert the exported G-codes to suitable kinematic commands for mobile robotic platforms. The differential drive crawler is used in this paper to demonstrate the process. This approach has benefits in terms of improved industrial standardization and operational repeatability. The inspection capabilities of the system were documented on an indoor mock-inspection scenario, within a motion tracking cell to provide quantitative performance figures for the approach. Future work is required to integrate the onboard positioning strategies, removing the dependence on global systems, for full automated deployment capability.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 213
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Framework for Coverage Path Planning Optimization Based on Point Cloud for Structural Inspection
    Biundini, Iago Z.
    Pinto, Milena F.
    Melo, Aurelio G.
    Marcato, Andre L. M.
    Honorio, Leonardo M.
    Aguiar, Maria J. R.
    [J]. SENSORS, 2021, 21 (02) : 1 - 20
  • [2] Optimized structural inspection path planning for automated unmanned aerial systems
    Zhao, Yuxiang
    Lu, Benhao
    Alipour, Mohamad
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 168
  • [3] Uniform Coverage Structural Inspection Path-Planning for Micro Aerial Vehicles
    Alexis, Kostas
    Papachristos, Christos
    Siegwart, Roland
    Tzes, Anthony
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL (ISIC 2015), 2015, : 59 - 64
  • [4] Robotic Coverage Path Planning for Ultrasonic Inspection
    Felsner, Kastor
    Schlachter, Klaus
    Zambal, Sebastian
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (22):
  • [5] Cooperative coverage path planning for visual inspection
    Mansouri, Sina Sharif
    Kanellakis, Christoforos
    Fresk, Emil
    Kominiak, Dariusz
    Nikolakopoulos, George
    [J]. CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2018, 74 : 118 - 131
  • [6] Multiobjective coverage path planning: Enabling automated inspection of complex, real-world structures
    Ellefsen, K. O.
    Lepikson, H. A.
    Albiez, J. C.
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 61 : 264 - 282
  • [7] Coverage Path Planning Optimization for Slopes and Dams Inspection
    Biundini, Iago Z.
    Melo, Aurelio G.
    Pinto, Milena F.
    Marins, Guilherme M.
    Marcato, Andre L. M.
    Honorio, Leonardo M.
    [J]. FOURTH IBERIAN ROBOTICS CONFERENCE: ADVANCES IN ROBOTICS, ROBOT 2019, VOL 2, 2020, 1093 : 513 - 523
  • [8] Coverage Path Planning using Path Primitive Sampling and Primitive Coverage Graph for Visual Inspection
    Jing, Wei
    Deng, Di
    Xiao, Zhe
    Liu, Yong
    Shimada, Kenji
    [J]. 2019 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2019, : 1472 - 1479
  • [9] Viewpoint Generation Using Geodesics and Associated Semi-Automated Coverage Path Planning of Panels for Inspection
    Chatterjee, Saurabh
    Issac, Kaadaapuram Kurien
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [10] Inspection Path planning of Free Form Surfaces Using Virtual Machining
    Obeidat, Suleiman
    Hung, Wayne N. P.
    [J]. 46TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE, NAMRC 46, 2018, 26 : 1492 - 1499