Application of fungicides and urea for control of ash dieback

被引:12
|
作者
Hauptman, Tine [1 ]
Celar, Franci Aco [2 ]
de Groot, Maarten [1 ]
Jurc, Dusan [1 ]
机构
[1] Slovenian Forestry Inst, Dept Forest Protect, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Agron, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus; Chemical Control; Mycelial Growth; Leaf Petioles; Apothecia Formation; FRAXINUS-EXCELSIOR; LEAF-LITTER; HYMENOSCYPHUS-PSEUDOALBIDUS; PATHOGEN; SYMPTOMS; GROWTH; CHERRY;
D O I
10.3832/ifor1272-008
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Ash dieback is caused by a highly pathogenic fungus Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus (anamorph Chalara fraxinea). Possibilities for disease control are limited, and treatment of fallen leaf debris to prevent sporulation of the pathogen is one of the possible options to control the disease. In some cases chemical treatments could be used, but data on effective chemical agents for control of the ash dieback are lacking. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different chemical fungicides and urea on the pathogen. Out of eight tested fungicides, mycelial growth in Petri plates as well as development of H. pseudoalbidus apothecia on ash leaf petioles were most efficiently inhibited by carbendazim. Urea also proved to be effective in prevention of apothecial formation. In addition to inhibition of the pathogen, urea accelerates the degradation of treated leaf debris. Therefore, the use of urea for treatment of infected ash leaf debris could be more effective than the use of fungicides and also more environmentally acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 171
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of fungicides on Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and their potential for control of ash dieback in forest nurseries
    Hrabetova, M.
    Cerny, K.
    Zahradnik, D.
    Havrdova, L.
    [J]. FOREST PATHOLOGY, 2017, 47 (02)
  • [2] FUNGICIDES FOR CONTROL OF DIEBACK OF CAMELLIAS
    ANZALONE, L
    PLAKIDAS, AG
    [J]. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1956, 46 (01) : 7 - 7
  • [3] Efficacy tests on commercial fungicides against ash dieback in vitro and by trunk injection
    Dal Maso, Elisa
    Cocking, Jonathan
    Montecchio, Lucio
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2014, 13 (04) : 697 - 703
  • [4] GENETIC PREDISPOSITIONS OF COMMON ASH TO THE ASH DIEBACK CAUSED BY ASH DIEBACK FUNGUS
    Papic, Slavica
    Longauer, Roman
    Milenkovic, Ivan
    Rozsypalek, Jiri
    [J]. GENETIKA-BELGRADE, 2018, 50 (01): : 221 - 229
  • [5] ASH DIEBACK AND DROUGHT
    TOBIESSEN, P
    BUCHSBAUM, S
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1976, 54 (5-6): : 543 - 545
  • [6] CONTROL OF VASCULAR-STREAK DIEBACK OF COCOA WITH TRIAZOLE FUNGICIDES AND THE PROBLEM OF PHYTOTOXICITY
    HOLDERNESS, M
    [J]. PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1990, 39 (02) : 286 - 293
  • [7] FUNGICIDES PROTECT APRICOT TREES AGAINST DIEBACK
    MOLLER, WJ
    RAMOS, DE
    ENGLISH, WH
    ROSS, NW
    ROUGH, D
    HENDRICKS, LC
    SANBORN, RR
    [J]. CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, 1977, 31 (07) : 10 - 11
  • [8] Statistics of ash dieback in Latvia
    Matisone, I
    Matisons, R.
    Laivins, M.
    Gaitnieks, T.
    [J]. SILVA FENNICA, 2018, 52 (01)
  • [9] Spread of Ash Dieback in Norway
    Solheim, Halvor
    Hietala, Ari M.
    [J]. BALTIC FORESTRY, 2017, 23 (01) : 144 - 149
  • [10] Control of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, the causal agent of ash dieback, using composting
    Noble, Ralph
    Woodhall, James W.
    Dobrovin-Pennington, Andreja
    Perkins, Kate
    Somoza-Valdeolmillos, Eder
    Gomez, Haizea L.
    Lu, Yi
    Macarthur, Roy
    Henry, Christine M.
    [J]. FOREST PATHOLOGY, 2019, 49 (06)