Evaluation of three population-based strategies for fracture prevention - Results of the osteoporosis population-based risk assessment (OPRA) trial

被引:21
|
作者
LaCroix, AZ
Buist, DSM
Brenneman, SK
Abbott, TA
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[3] Merck & Co Inc, Outcomes Res & Management, W Point, PA USA
关键词
bone density testing; fracture prevention; osteoporosis screening programs;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-200503000-00012
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The integration of bone density testing into well-designed fracture prevention programs that can be applied in populations has not been studied. Objectives: We sought to compare the outcomes of 3 strategies for allocating bone density testing within an HMO-based fracture prevention program. Research Design: Women were randomly sampled and allocated to one of 3 groups: (1) a universal group, in which all were offered bone mineral density (BMD) testing (1986 contacted; 415 participated); 2) the SCORE group, in which women scoring greater than or equal to 7 on the SCORE questionnaire were invited for BMD testing (1940 contacted; 576 participated); and (3) the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture(SOF)-based group, in which women with greater than or equal to 5 hip fracture risk factors were invited for BMD testing (5342 contacted; 2176 participated). Subjects: Women aged 60-80 not taking hormone therapy or osteoporosis medication were included. Measures: Outcomes ascertained during 33 months of follow-up in all women contacted included initiation of osteoporosis treatment and hip and total fracture rates. Outcomes evaluated among all participants included changes in fracture risk factors, osteoporosis knowledge, and satisfaction with the. program. Results: Osteoporosis treatment rates did not differ among all women contacted but were slightly higher among trial participants in the universal and SCORE groups (21.1% and 20.2%, respectively; versus 16.7% in the SOF-based group (P value versus universal = 0.04). Among all women contacted, fracture rates were lowest in the with the SCORE (99.44/1000; P = 0.009) and SOF-based groups (91.77/1000;P = 0.02). Knowledge about osteoporosis risk factors was highest in the universal group and lowest in the SOF-based group (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The degree to which BMD testing was offered to women in a fracture prevention program significantly affected total fracture rates, change in some fracture risk factors, and knowledge about risk factors.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 302
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The osteoporosis population-based risk assessment trial (OPRA) comparing three strategies for fracture prevention.
    LaCroix, AZ
    Buist, DSM
    Abbott, TA
    Brenneman, SK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2002, 17 : S260 - S260
  • [2] Population-Based Fracture Risk Assessment and Osteoporosis Treatment Disparities by Race and Gender
    Curtis, Jeffrey R.
    McClure, Leslie A.
    Delzell, Elizabeth
    Howard, Virginia J.
    Orwoll, Eric
    Saag, Kenneth G.
    Safford, Monika
    Howard, George
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 (08) : 956 - 962
  • [3] Population-Based Fracture Risk Assessment and Osteoporosis Treatment Disparities by Race and Gender
    Jeffrey R. Curtis
    Leslie A. McClure
    Elizabeth Delzell
    Virginia J. Howard
    Eric Orwoll
    Kenneth G. Saag
    Monika Safford
    George Howard
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2009, 24 : 956 - 962
  • [4] A population-based study of the risk of osteoporosis and fracture with dutasteride and finasteride
    Tony Antoniou
    Erin M. Macdonald
    Zhan Yao
    Tara Gomes
    Mina Tadrous
    Joanne M.-W. Ho
    Muhammad M. Mamdani
    David N. Juurlink
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 19
  • [5] A population-based study of the risk of osteoporosis and fracture with dutasteride and finasteride
    Antoniou, Tony
    Macdonald, Erin M.
    Yao, Zhan
    Gomes, Tara
    Tadrous, Mina
    Ho, Joanne M. -W.
    Mamdani, Muhammad M.
    Juurlink, David N.
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2018, 19
  • [6] Assessment of fracture risk - Value of random population-based samples - The Geelong Osteoporosis Study
    Henry, MJ
    Pasco, JA
    Seeman, E
    Nicholson, GC
    Sanders, KM
    Kotowicz, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2001, 4 (04) : 283 - 289
  • [7] Family history of appendicular fracture and risk of osteoporosis: A population-based study
    Keen, RW
    Hart, DJ
    Arden, NK
    Doyle, DV
    Spector, TD
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 10 (02) : 161 - 166
  • [8] Family History of Appendicular Fracture and Risk of Osteoporosis: A Population-Based Study
    R. W. Keen
    D. J. Hart
    N. K. Arden
    D. V. Doyle
    T. D. Spector
    [J]. Osteoporosis International, 1999, 10 : 161 - 166
  • [9] External validity of a population-based study on osteoporosis and fracture
    Wihlborg, Axel
    Akesson, Kristina
    Gerdhem, Paul
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2014, 85 (04) : 433 - 437
  • [10] Evaluation of the FRAX Model for Hip Fracture Predictions in the Population-based Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study (OSTPRE)
    Sund, Reijo
    Honkanen, Risto
    Johansson, Helena
    Oden, Anders
    McCloskey, Eugene
    Kanis, John
    Kroger, Heikki
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 95 (01) : 39 - 45