Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vortioxetine for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults

被引:10
|
作者
Zhang, Xinyan [1 ]
Cai, Yuchun [1 ]
Hu, Xiaowen [1 ]
Lu, Christine Y. [2 ,3 ]
Nie, Xiaoyan [1 ,4 ]
Shi, Luwen [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharm Adm & Clin Pharm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Peking Univ, Int Res Ctr Med Adm, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
vortioxetine; major depressive disorder; adults; randomized controlled trials; meta-analysis; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS; CONTROLLED 8-WEEK TRIAL; 5 MG VORTIOXETINE; STAR-ASTERISK-D; DOUBLE-BLIND; LU AA21004; MG/DAY VORTIOXETINE; COGNITIVE FUNCTION; ACTIVE-REFERENCE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2022.922648
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: We aimed to compare the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of vortioxetine in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in adults. Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (CENTRAL), and for randomized controlled trials that examined vortioxetine vs. placebo or other antidepressants for the treatment of MDD from database inception to August 30, 2021, using keywords Vortioxetine, Brintellix, Trintellix, LuAA21004, major depressive disorder, mood disorder, affective disorder, and MDD. We identified 789 publications after removing duplicates. After screening, 20 eligible randomized controlled trials were identified, of which 19 were included in the final meta-analysis. We included adults (aged 18 years and older) with a primary diagnosis of MDD. Two review authors independently selected the studies and extracted data. We extracted data on study characteristics, participant characteristics, intervention details and outcome measures in terms of efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability. Analyses were performed using random-effects models, and outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs). Results: In total, 20 studies (8,547 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Vortioxetine outperformed the placebo in efficacy outcomes, including response (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.23-1.48; P < 0.001), remission (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.52; P < 0.001), and cognitive function (SMD 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.52; P = 0.0003). Compared with the serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), vortioxetine had better tolerability (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.94; P < 0.001) but no significant difference in response (RR 0.91, 95%CI 0.82-1.00; P = 0.06) or remission (RR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.81-1.20, P = 0.88). Vortioxetine had no difference in response (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.88-1.32; P = 0.46), remission (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.41-2.44; P = 1.00) comparing with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Conclusions: Vortioxetine is more advantageous over placebo in treating MDD among adults, but no significant difference compared to SNRIs and SSRIs in general.Systematic Review Registration, identifier: CRD42021278355.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vortioxetine versus venlafaxine for major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Maneeton, B.
    Maneeton, N.
    Woottiluk, P.
    Oonarom, A.
    Wiriyacosol, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 29 : S45 - S45
  • [2] The safety and efficacy of vortioxetine for acute treatment of major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meeker A.S.
    Herink M.C.
    Haxby D.G.
    Hartung D.M.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)
  • [3] Effectiveness and Safety of Vortioxetine for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in the Real World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Zejun
    Liu, Shouhuan
    Wu, Qiuxia
    Li, Jing
    Yang, Qian
    Wang, Xin
    Peng, Pu
    Wang, Qianjin
    Liu, Yueheng
    Li, Manyun
    Hao, Yuzhu
    Xu, Huixue
    He, Li
    Wang, Yunfei
    Chen, Shubao
    Liu, Tieqiao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 26 (06): : 373 - 384
  • [4] Vortioxetine versus reuptake inhibitors in adults with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Barbosa, Eduardo Cerchi
    da Silva, Giovanna Hanike Santos
    Sbardelotto, Angelo Eduardo Espindola
    Barroso, Douglas Carneiro
    de Lima, Fernanda Ribeiro
    Paez, Loyna Eua Flores E.
    Lanca, Saulo Bernardo
    Petrucci, Arthur Bezerra Cavalcanti
    Guimaraes, Felipe Bandeira de Melo
    Nascimento, Antonio Leandro
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 101
  • [5] Zuranolone for treatment of major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ahmad, Abdullah
    Awan, Abdul Rafeh
    Nadeem, Natasha
    Javed, Aamir Shahid
    Farooqi, Mobeen
    Daniyal, Muhammed
    Mumtaz, Hassan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [6] The safety and efficacy of vortioxetine for acute treatment of major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Meeker, Amanda
    Hartung, Daniel
    Herink, Megan
    Haxby, Dean
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2014, 34 (10): : E262 - E262
  • [7] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cognitive Training in Adults with Major Depressive Disorder
    C. Woolf
    A. Lampit
    Z. Shahnawaz
    J. Sabates
    L. M. Norrie
    D. Burke
    S. L. Naismith
    L. Mowszowski
    [J]. Neuropsychology Review, 2022, 32 : 419 - 437
  • [8] A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive training in adults with Major Depressive Disorder
    Woolf, Claudia
    Lampit, Amit
    Shahnawaz, Zeeshan
    Sabates, Julieta
    Norrie, Louisa
    Burke, David
    Naismith, Sharon
    Mowszowski, Loren
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2020, 32 : 191 - 191
  • [9] Attention deficits in adults with Major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Xiang
    Zhou, Huan
    Zhu, Xiongzhao
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 53
  • [10] Physical exercise and major depressive disorder in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bedoya, Edison Andres Perez
    Puerta-Lopez, Luisa Fernanda
    Galvis, Daniel Alejandro Lopez
    Jaimes, Diego Alejandro Rojas
    Moreira, Osvaldo Costa
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)