Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Control After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Trial

被引:46
|
作者
Lynch, Jonathan R. [1 ]
Okoroha, Kelechi R. [1 ]
Lizzio, Vincent [1 ]
Yu, Charles C. [1 ]
Jildeh, Toufic R. [1 ]
Moutzouros, Vasilios [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2499 W Grand Blvd K12, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2019年 / 47卷 / 02期
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; regional anesthesia; postoperative pain control; adductor canal block; femoral nerve block; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; SAPHENOUS NERVE; DOUBLE-BLIND; LUMBAR PLEXUS; BUPIVACAINE; SURGERY; EFFICACY; INFILTRATION; ROPIVACAINE;
D O I
10.1177/0363546518815874
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Femoral nerve block (FNB) is a commonly performed technique that has been proven to provide effective regional analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The adductor canal block (ACB) uses a similar sensory block around the knee while avoiding motor blockade of the quadriceps muscles. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of our study was to compare the efficacy of FNB versus ACB for pain control after ACL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in pain levels or opioid requirements between the 2 groups. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: We performed a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Sixty patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft were randomized to receive either an ACB or an FNB preoperatively. The primary outcomes assessed were pain levels (visual analog scale) and narcotic requirements for 4 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included ability to perform a straight leg raise in the recovery room and difference in thigh circumference between the operative and nonoperative leg measured at 7 days postoperatively. Results: Morphine requirements were less in the ACB group in the first 4 hours postoperatively (P = .02). Aside from this time interval, no differences were found between the 2 groups with regard to opioid requirements and pain scores at any other time. Similarly, no differences were noted in patients' ability to perform a straight leg raise in the recovery room (P = .13) or in thigh circumference at the first postoperative visit (P = .09). Conclusion: The results of our study suggest similar efficacy in perioperative pain control with the use of an ACB for ACL reconstruction when compared with FNB. The potential long-term benefit of quadriceps preservation with the ACB is worthy of future study. Registration: NCT03033589 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 363
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Control After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Case Closed? Response
    Okoroha, Kelechi R.
    Moutzouros, Vasilios
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (10): : NP49 - NP50
  • [2] Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Control After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Case Closed? Letter to the Editor
    Pence, Kristi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (10): : NP49 - NP49
  • [3] Femoral nerve block versus adductor canal block for postoperative pain control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A randomized controlled double blind study
    El Ahl, Mohamed Sayed
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 9 (03) : 279 - 282
  • [4] Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Interventional Study
    Dhumey, Tapan
    Bhalerao, Nikhil
    Paul, Amreesh
    Wanjari, Dnyanshree
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [5] Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Control After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Okoroha, Kelechi R.
    Keller, Robert A.
    Marshall, Nathan E.
    Jung, Edward K.
    Mehran, Nima
    Owashi, Eric
    Moutzouros, Vasilios
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (09): : 1838 - 1845
  • [6] Femoral nerve block vs adductor canal block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under general anesthesia A prospective randomized trial protocol
    Xue, Qingpei
    Jiang, Wei
    Wang, Meng
    Sui, Jinkui
    Wang, Yiping
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (28) : E20776
  • [7] Quadriceps Strength Deficits After a Femoral Nerve Block Versus Adductor Canal Block for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Single-Blinded, Randomized Trial
    Runner, Robert P.
    Boden, Stephanie A.
    Godfrey, William S.
    Premkumar, Ajay
    Samady, Heather
    Gottschalk, Michael B.
    Xerogeanes, John W.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (09)
  • [8] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the use of adductor canal block can achieve similar pain control as femoral nerve block
    Huan Min
    Yulong Ouyang
    Gang Chen
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2020, 28 : 2675 - 2686
  • [9] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the use of adductor canal block can achieve similar pain control as femoral nerve block
    Min, Huan
    Ouyang, Yulong
    Chen, Gang
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2020, 28 (08) : 2675 - 2686
  • [10] Comparison of adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for pain management in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yin, Xiao
    Li, Xingyue
    Zhao, Peng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (25) : E29295