Root chemistry of mature Douglas-fir differs by habitat type in the interior northwestern United States

被引:0
|
作者
Moore, JA [1 ]
Mika, PG [1 ]
Shaw, TM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Forest Resources, Intermountain Forest Tree Nutr Cooperat, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
关键词
carbon allocation; adaptation; disease resistance; drought resistance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Carbon compound concentrations in plant tissues depend on the environment in which plants grow. However, little is known about how these concentrations vary across a range of forest environmental conditions. Our study examined root tissue (phloem, cambium, phellum, and phelloderm) collected from naturally regenerated mature Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca, [Bessn.] Franco) trees in eight stands on three habitat type series encompassing a range of temperature and moisture conditions. The objective was to determine root chemical composition (sugar, starch, phenol, and tannin) differences among the habitat types. Douglas-fir roots collected from dry, warm Douglas fir habitat types had sugar concentrations of 4% compared to 3% for roots from cool, moist habitat types. Root samples collected from Douglas-fir habitat types showed tannin concentrations about double those from grand fir or western redcedar habitat types. Phenol/tannin ratios for the cool, moist habitat types were about double those from warm, dry Douglas-fir habitat types. Roots sampled from western redcedar habitat types had phenol concentrations and phenol/ sugar ratios more than 50% higher than those from Douglas-fir and grand fir habitat types. We speculate that root chemistry of Douglas-fir growing on Douglas-fir habitat types could make them more drought resistant but less disease resistant, while Douglas-fir growing on western redcedar types would be less drought resistant but more disease resistant. Douglas-fir growing on warm, dry sites allocated more carbon to tannin production and less to phenols.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 536
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [2] Risk rating systems for the Douglas-fir beetle in the interior western United States
    Dodds, Kevin J.
    Garman, Steven L.
    Ross, Darrell W.
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF APPLIED FORESTRY, 2006, 21 (04): : 173 - 177
  • [3] Risk rating systems for the douglas-fir beetle in the interior Western United States
    Dodds, Kevin J.
    Garman, Steven L.
    Ross, Darrell W.
    [J]. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 2006, 21 (04): : 173 - 177
  • [4] Coarse root elongation rate estimates for interior Douglas-fir
    Richardson, A
    [J]. TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 20 (12) : 825 - 829
  • [5] Douglas-fir beetle infestations are associated with certain rock and stand types in the inland northwestern United States
    Garrison-Johnston, MT
    Moore, JA
    Cook, SP
    Niehoff, GJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2003, 32 (06) : 1354 - 1363
  • [6] Fate of taxa after variable-retention harvesting in Douglas-fir forests of the northwestern United States
    Maguire, DA
    Canavan, S
    Halpern, CB
    Aubry, KB
    [J]. Balancing Ecosystem Values: Innovative Experiments for Sustainable Forestry, 2004, 635 : 271 - 279
  • [7] Changes in Interior Douglas-Fir Root Development in Containers after Copper and Auxin Treatments
    Kasten, Dumroese, R.
    [J]. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 2000, 15 (04): : 213 - 216
  • [8] A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF SHOOT AND ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF INTERIOR AND COASTAL DOUGLAS-FIR SEEDLINGS
    FIELDER, P
    OWENS, JN
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1989, 19 (05): : 539 - 549
  • [9] Effects of laminated root rot (Phellinus weirii) on Douglas-fir foliar chemistry
    Thomson, AJ
    Goodenough, DG
    Barclay, HJ
    Lee, YJ
    Sturrock, RN
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1996, 26 (08): : 1440 - 1445
  • [10] Root chemistry of Douglas-fir seedlings grown under different nitrogen and potassium regimes
    Shaw, TM
    Moore, JA
    Marshall, JD
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1998, 28 (10): : 1566 - 1573