Health monitoring and structural reliability as a value chain

被引:19
|
作者
Wong, FS
Yao, JTP
机构
[1] Weidlinger Associates Inc, Los Altos, CA 94022 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/0885-9507.00214
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A value chain is defined as an end-to-end solution to a problem, with the beneficiary constituting one end of the chain and the enabling technologies (or parties) making up the rest of the chain. In this context, enabling technologies such as health monitoring, damage detection, and reliability are viewed as sequential components in a chain, with each continuing the chain while adding value to it, so that the aggregate value of the chain can be delivered to the ownership. This holistic view is taken to expose a current imbalance in technology development, and the weak link corresponds to a lack of information that relates technology-investment costs to financial benefits for the owner. Structural reliability, useful life expectancy, and other information of this genre ore seen to be keeping the full value of the chain from being realized and appreciated by the ownership. An example of what the desired linkage may be comes from aerospace and mechanical engineering. In the form of so-called symptom-based reliability technology, reliability is quantified for existing structures based on actual usage instead of natural age and measured symptoms instead of idealized model prediction. Hence it is also compatible with current health-monitoring and damage-detection developments (enabling technologies of the value chain). Since the value of the chain is only as (in)effective as its weakest link, it is argued that future research effort should stress balanced development throughout the chain.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the value of structural health monitoring
    Faber, M. H.
    Thoens, S.
    [J]. SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK ANALYSIS: BEYOND THE HORIZON, 2014, : 2535 - 2544
  • [2] The value of monitoring a structural health monitoring system
    Giordano, Pier Francesco
    Quqa, Said
    Limongelli, Maria Pina
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2023, 100
  • [3] Symptom based reliability and structural health monitoring
    Yao, JTP
    Wong, FS
    [J]. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONTORING 2000, 1999, : 743 - 753
  • [4] Reliability analysis of structural health monitoring systems
    Etebu, E.
    Shafiee, M.
    [J]. SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, 2018, : 2243 - 2247
  • [5] Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) Reliability Workshop
    Swindell, Paul
    [J]. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING 2015: SYSTEM RELIABILITY FOR VERIFICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION, VOLS. 1 AND 2, 2015, : 2690 - 2695
  • [6] Sensor modules for structural health monitoring and reliability of components
    Kroening, M
    Berthold, A
    Meyendorf, N
    [J]. Advanced Sensor Technologies for Nondestructive Evaluation and Structural Health Monitoring, 2005, 5770 : 149 - 151
  • [7] Improving the Reliability of Sensor Skins for Structural Health Monitoring
    Mohammad, I.
    Huang, H.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING 2011: CONDITION-BASED MAINTENANCE AND INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES, VOL 2, 2013, : 1748 - 1755
  • [8] Optic sensor reliability issues in structural health monitoring
    Xu, ZH
    Bassam, A
    Jia, HQ
    Tennant, A
    Ansari, F
    [J]. SMART STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS 2005: SMART SENSOR TECHNOLOGY AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS, 2005, 5758 : 390 - 404
  • [9] Reliability index for structural health monitoring of aging bridges
    Dissanayake, P. B. R.
    Karunananda, P. A. K.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2008, 7 (02): : 175 - 183
  • [10] Regional Timber Bridge Girder Reliability: Structural Health Monitoring and Reliability Strategies
    Moore, John C.
    Glenncross-Grant, Rex
    Mahini, Seyed Saeed
    Patterson, Robert
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 15 (05) : 793 - 806