Similar Early Complication Rate in Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Recipients on Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Tacrolimus/Sirolimus Immunosuppressive Regimens

被引:10
|
作者
Girman, P. [1 ]
Lipar, K.
Koznarova, R. [1 ]
Boucek, P. [1 ]
Kriz, J. [1 ]
Kocik, M.
Havrdova, T. [1 ]
Adamec, M. [1 ]
Saudek, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Clin & Expt Med, Ctr Diabet, Prague 14021, Czech Republic
关键词
WOUND-HEALING COMPLICATIONS; TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; ISLET TRANSPLANTATION; SIROLIMUS; RAPAMYCIN; WITHDRAWAL; CONVERSION; REJECTION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.05.121
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. We compared the incidence of severe complications among 123 consecutive simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) recipients randomized for treatment either with tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or tacrolimus plus sirolimus during their initial postoperative hospital stay. Methods. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and renal failure with no age limit who underwent SPK were randomly assigned to tacrolimus/sirolimus or tacrolimus/MMF immunosuppressive protocols. We analyzed the rate of adverse events that led to death, graft loss, operative revision, or prolonged hospital stay. Results. From 2002 to 2009, 62 recipients were included in the MMF and 61 in the Rapamycin (Rapa) groups. More than 2/3 of recipients suffered from at least 1 complication: 74% MMF and 77% Rapa group (P > .05). No patient died in the MMF and 3 in the Rapa group (P = .11). Pancreas graftectomy was performed in 13% of the MMF group and in 5% of the Rapa group (P = .20). Ten of 62 recipients in the MMF and 13/61 in the Rapa group required operative treatment of wound infections (P = .49). There were no differences in the rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (11% and 8%), kidney lymphocele (6% and 5%), ileus (1.6% both), pancreatic leak (1.6% both), or ureteral leak (0 and 3%) between the groups. Conclusion. We did not observe a difference in the rate of severe postoperative complications between groups. With the use of extraperitoneal placement of the pancreatic graft, fluid collections and wound infections remain the most frequent albeit curable postoperative complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1999 / 2002
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Similar early complication rate in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) recipients on tacrolimus/MMF and tacrolimus/sirolimus immunosuppressive regimens
    Peter, Girman
    Kvetoslav, Lipar
    Radomira, Koznarova
    Petr, Boucek
    Tereza, Havrdova
    Milos, Adamec
    Frantisek, Saudek
    [J]. XENOTRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 16 (06) : 542 - 542
  • [2] Thymoglobulin Induction and Sirolimus Versus Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Mycophenolate Mofetil and Steroids
    Glotz, Denis
    Charpentier, Bernard
    Abramovicz, Daniel
    Lang, Philippe
    Rostaing, Lionel
    Rifle, Gerard
    Vanrenterghem, Yves
    Berthoux, Francois
    Bourbigot, Bernard
    Delahousse, Michel
    Chalopin, Jean-Marc
    Cassuto, Elisabeth
    Lefrancois, Nicole
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 89 (12) : 1511 - 1517
  • [3] Mycophenolate mofetil vs. sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen
    Sampaio, Edison L.
    Pinheiro-Machado, Paula G.
    Garcia, Riberto
    Felipe, Claudia R.
    Park, Sung I.
    Casarini, Dulce E.
    Moreira, Silvia
    Franco, Marcello F.
    Tedesco-Silva, Helio, Jr.
    Medina-Pestana, Jose O.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 22 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [4] Long-Term Kidney Allograft Function and Survival in Prednisone-Free Regimens: Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Tacrolimus/Sirolimus
    Chhabra, Darshika
    Skaro, Anton I.
    Leventhal, Joseph R.
    Dalal, Pranav
    Shah, Gaurav
    Wang, Edward
    Gallon, Lorenzo
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 7 (03): : 504 - 512
  • [5] Improved renal function after conversion from tacrolimus/sirolimus to tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplant recipients
    Augustine, JJ
    Chang, PC
    Knauss, TC
    Aeder, MI
    Bodziak, KA
    Schulak, JA
    Hricik, DE
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 81 (07) : 1004 - 1009
  • [6] Comparison of Sirolimus Combined With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Combined With Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation Recipients: A Meta-Analysis
    Gao, L.
    Xu, F.
    Cheng, H.
    Liu, J.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 50 (10) : 3306 - 3313
  • [7] Long-term renal transplant function in recipient of simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant maintained with two prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive combinations: Tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus
    Gallon, Lorenzo G.
    Winoto, Johan
    Chhabra, Darshika
    Parker, Michele A.
    Leventhal, Joseph R.
    Kaufman, Dixon B.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 83 (10) : 1324 - 1329
  • [8] Drug Concentration Monitoring of Immunosuppressive AgentsFocus on Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Sirolimus
    Shirley M. Tsunoda
    Francesca T. Aweeka
    [J]. BioDrugs, 2000, 14 : 355 - 369
  • [9] The ORION Study: Comparison of Two Sirolimus-Based Regimens versus Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Allograft Recipients
    Flechner, S. M.
    Glyda, M.
    Cockfield, S.
    Grinyo, J.
    Legendre, Ch.
    Russ, G.
    Steinberg, S.
    Wissing, K. M.
    Tai, S. S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 (08) : 1633 - 1644
  • [10] A prospective study of rapid corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation - Comparison of two maintenance immunosuppression protocols: Tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus
    Kaufman, DB
    Leventhal, JR
    Koffron, AJ
    Gallon, LG
    Parker, MA
    Fryer, JP
    Abecassis, MM
    Stuart, FP
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (02) : 169 - 177