Perceptions of long-acting reversible contraception among women in an urban US jail

Objective: Given incarcerated women's lack of access to contraception prior to, during, and post-incarceration and concerns of potential reproductive coercion in correctional settings, the objective was to explore incarcerated women's perspective of making provider-controlled methods of long-acting re-versible contraception (LARC) available in an U.S. urban jail. Study design: Using a concurrent mixed-methods approach, we explored contraceptive use and method choice prior to and after incarceration among women detained in a U.S. urban jail. Focus group discus-sions primarily focused on incarcerated women's perceptions of LARC. Results: In the 30 days prior to arrest, 28 of 116 women (24%) were using a non-barrier contraceptive method. Methods of LARC were used the least, and the majority ( n = 74, 64%) were not interested in ini-tiating LARC in jail. Concern about the potential side effects of LARC was the main reason for disinterest followed by distrust in correctional health care staffs' qualifications. Study participants did not reference coercion as a concern. Conclusions: Apprehension about the training of health care providers and cleanliness of the deten-tion facility outweighed participants' concerns regarding autonomy restrictions associated with provider-controlled methods of LARC. Despite limited interest in initiating LARC use while incarcerated, partici-pants supported making all forms of contraception more accessible in jail settings. Implications: Understanding incarcerated women's reproductive and contraceptive desires, including their perceptions of LARC, will help improve the provision of equitable reproductive health care in correctional settings. Our findings highlight the importance of contextual factors in determining women's willingness to access contraceptive care in carceral settings, if available. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.