Simulation of fatigue crack growth under large scale yielding conditions

被引:9
|
作者
Schweizer, Christoph [1 ]
Seifert, Thomas [1 ]
Riedel, Hermann [1 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Mech Mat IWM, D-79108 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
HARDENING MATERIAL; TIP;
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/240/1/012043
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A simple mechanism based model for fatigue crack growth assumes a linear correlation between the cyclic crack-tip opening displacement (Delta CTOD) and the crack growth increment (da/dN). The objective of this work is to compare analytical estimates of Delta CTOD with results of numerical calculations under large scale yielding conditions and to verify the physical basis of the model by comparing the predicted and the measured evolution of the crack length in a 10%-chromium-steel. The material is described by a rate independent cyclic plasticity model with power-law hardening and Masing behavior. During the tension-going part of the cycle, nodes at the crack-tip are released such that the crack growth increment corresponds approximately to the crack-tip opening. The finite element analysis performed in ABAQUS is continued for so many cycles until a stabilized value of Delta CTOD is reached. The analytical model contains an interpolation formula for the J-integral, which is generalized to account for cyclic loading and crack closure. Both simulated and estimated Delta CTOD are reasonably consistent. The predicted crack length evolution is found to be in good aggrement with the behavior of microcracks observed in a 10%-chromium steel.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Methodology for fatigue crack growth testing under large scale yielding conditions on corner-crack specimens
    Schweizer, Christoph
    Schlesinger, Michael
    Oesterlin, Heiner
    Friedmann, Valerie
    Bednarz, Piotr
    Meilgen, Christoph
    Szwedowicz, Jaroslaw
    [J]. ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2014, 126 : 126 - 140
  • [2] Fatigue crack growth under large scale yielding condition: The need of a characteristic length scale
    Maurel, V.
    Koster, A.
    Remy, L.
    Rambaudon, M.
    Missoum-Benziane, D.
    Fontanet, V.
    Salgado-Goncalves, F.
    Heudt, A.
    Wang, H.
    Trabelsi, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2017, 102 : 184 - 201
  • [3] Fatigue crack growth under large scale yielding condition in a cast automotive aluminum alloy
    Dezecot, Sebastien
    Rambaudon, Matthieu
    Koster, Alain
    Szmytka, Fabien
    Maurel, Vincent
    Buffiere, Jean-Yves
    [J]. MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2019, 743 : 87 - 97
  • [4] A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH TO DUCTILE CRACK-GROWTH UNDER LARGE-SCALE YIELDING CONDITIONS
    XIA, L
    SHIH, CF
    HUTCHINSON, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 1995, 43 (03) : 389 - 413
  • [5] A crack closure model of fatigue crack growth in plates of finite thickness under small-scale yielding conditions
    Codrington, John
    Kotousov, Andrei
    [J]. MECHANICS OF MATERIALS, 2009, 41 (02) : 165 - 173
  • [6] CHARACTERIZATION OF FATIGUE CRACK-GROWTH IN INTERMEDIATE AND LARGE-SCALE YIELDING
    MCCLUNG, RC
    SEHITOGLU, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1991, 113 (01): : 15 - 22
  • [7] Fatigue crack growth experiments on specimens subjected to monotonic large scale yielding
    Ljustell, P.
    [J]. ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2013, 110 : 138 - 165
  • [8] Simulation of crack resistance using a cohesive model: large scale yielding conditions
    Cornec, A
    Lin, G
    Schwalbe, KH
    [J]. MATERIALWISSENSCHAFT UND WERKSTOFFTECHNIK, 1998, 29 (11) : 652 - 661
  • [9] Modified stress intensity factor as a crack growth parameter applicable under large scale yielding conditions
    Yasuoka, Tetsuo
    Mizutani, Yoshihiro
    Todoroki, Akira
    [J]. MECHANICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 1 (03):
  • [10] Fatigue crack shielding and deflection in plain bearings under large-scale yielding
    Burke-Veliz, A.
    Syngellakis, S.
    Reed, P. A. S.
    [J]. ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2010, 17 (03) : 648 - 657