共 50 条
A Risk Prediction Index for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia at Screening Colonoscopy
被引:38
|作者:
Schroy, Paul C., III
[1
]
Wong, John B.
[2
]
O'Brien, Michael J.
[3
]
Chen, Clara A.
[4
]
Griffith, John L.
[5
]
机构:
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Data Coordinating Ctr, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[5] Northeastern Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Bouve Coll Hlth Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源:
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
HARVARD CANCER-RISK;
AMERICAN-COLLEGE;
ADENOMATOUS POLYPS;
DECISION-MAKING;
VALIDATION;
PREVALENCE;
MODELS;
WHITE;
TOOL;
PERFORMANCE;
D O I:
10.1038/ajg.2015.146
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
OBJECTIVES: Eliciting patient preferences within the context of shared decision making has been advocated for colorectal cancer screening. Risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) might facilitate more effective shared decision making when selecting an appropriate screening option. Our objective was to develop and validate a clinical index for estimating the probability of ACN at screening colonoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 3,543 asymptomatic, mostly average-risk patients 50-79 years of age undergoing screening colonoscopy at two urban safety net hospitals. Predictors of ACN were identified using multiple logistic regression. Model performance was internally validated using bootstrapping methods. RESULTS: The final index consisted of five independent predictors of risk (age, smoking, alcohol intake, height, and a combined sex/race/ethnicity variable). Smoking was the strongest predictor (net reclassification improvement (NRI), 8.4%) and height the weakest (NRI, 1.5%). Using a simplified weighted scoring system based on 0.5 increments of the adjusted odds ratio, the risk of ACN ranged from 3.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.6-3.9) for the low-risk group (score = 2) to 8.6% (95% CI, 7.4-9.7) for the intermediate/high-risk group (score 3-11). The model had moderate to good overall discrimination (C-statistic, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.66-0.72) and good calibration (P = 0.73-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: A simple 5-item risk index based on readily available clinical data accurately stratifies average-risk patients into low-and intermediate/high-risk categories for ACN at screening colonoscopy. Uptake into clinical practice could facilitate more effective shared decision-making for CRC screening, particularly in situations where patient and provider test preferences differ.
引用
收藏
页码:1062 / 1071
页数:10
相关论文