Panel Discussion on Energy Efficiency

被引:3
|
作者
Heap, Brian [1 ]
Kasemo, Bengt [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, European Acad Sci Advisory Board, Cambridge, England
[2] Royal Swedish Acad Sci, Energy Comm, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Chalmers, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Energy; Efficiency; Transport; Jevons paradox; Population; International collaboration;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-010-0060-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The session on energy efficiency had no formal presentations and was organized as a panel discussion with four panelists. It was concluded that energy efficiency and saving measures on the short term is the most effective way to contribute to a sustainable energy system. Measures to improve and encourage energy efficiency should be implemented at all levels; municipal/local, national and super-national. Prices can be an effective instrument but need to be combined with systemic level measures. The transport sector was identified as the one with largest near future potential for increased energy efficiency. Agriculture and food is also an area with very large energy consumption and large potential for increased energy efficiency. The global population issue is yet another relevant, challenging and complex issue. It was noted that energy audits for end users in business and society increase awareness and insights into what they pay for, and they are likely to promote actions to save energy. Many measures are believed to suffer from Jevin's paradox, i.e., that more efficient use of energy just leads to more energy consumption somewhere else. Many examples were given, however, where this does not happen. Another point put forward was that measures to make the energy system more efficient do not only mean constraints and regulations but also create great opportunities for market actors and societies.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 25
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Panel Discussion on Energy Efficiency
    Brian Heap
    Bengt Kasemo
    [J]. AMBIO, 2010, 39 : 22 - 25
  • [2] FOGI Panel Discussion: Energy Efficiency in the Thermal Processing Industry
    不详
    [J]. CFI-CERAMIC FORUM INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 88 (10): : E49 - E49
  • [3] ENERGY SAVING RECOMMENDATIONS - PANEL DISCUSSION
    Latimer, David
    Vodak, Peter
    Horton, Mike
    [J]. 68TH PORCELAIN ENAMEL INSTITUTE TECHNICAL FORUM, 2007, 27 (09): : 55 - 62
  • [4] IISI PANEL DISCUSSION - THE OUTLOOK FOR ENERGY
    HADFIELD, PDS
    QUENON, RH
    LEWINER, C
    [J]. IRONMAKING & STEELMAKING, 1992, 19 (02) : 93 - 94
  • [5] Discussion of energy efficiency evaluation
    Pchelin, Vladimir M.
    [J]. Light and Engineering, 2014, 22 (01): : 68 - 70
  • [6] DISCUSSION OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY EVALUATION
    Pchelin, Vladimir M.
    [J]. LIGHT & ENGINEERING, 2014, 22 (01): : 68 - 70
  • [7] PANEL DISCUSSION, HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS
    FRENCH, B
    JAMES, F
    KOWARSKI, L
    VELTMAN, M
    ZICHICHI, A
    [J]. COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1972, 3 : 157 - 165
  • [8] ROLE OF NUCLEAR-ENERGY - PANEL DISCUSSION
    HENNIES, H
    CARLE, RL
    CUNNINGHAM, G
    EIBENSCHUTZ, J
    WANG, D
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1981, 37 : 25 - 33
  • [9] Energy panel urges efficiency, carbon limits
    不详
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2004, 82 (50) : 22 - 22
  • [10] Road map and policy of energy: Panel Discussion about alternative energy
    Sanders, Mark
    Sanders, Charlotta
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 255