Individualized Relative-Intensity Physical Activity Accelerometer Cut Points

被引:15
|
作者
Siddique, Juned [1 ]
Aaby, David [1 ]
Montag, Samantha E. [1 ]
Sidney, Stephen [2 ]
Sternfeld, Barbara [2 ]
Welch, Whitney A. [1 ]
Carnethon, Mercedes R. [1 ]
Liu, Kiang [1 ]
Craft, Lynette L. [3 ]
Gabriel, Kelley Pettee [4 ]
Gibbs, Bethany Barone [5 ]
Reis, Jared P. [6 ]
Freedson, Patty [7 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, 680 N Lake Shore Dr,Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div OfRes, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Amer Coll Sports Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol Human Genet & Environm Sci, Austin, TX USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Hlth & Phys Act, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] NHLBI, Div Cardiovasc Sci, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[7] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Kinesiol, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
来源
关键词
GRADED EXERCISE TREADMILL TEST; MAXIMAL HEART RATE; RPE; ABSOLUTE INTENSITY; COHORT STUDY; YOUNG-ADULTS; CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS; RISK DEVELOPMENT; LONGEVITY; LIGHT; MEN; ASSOCIATIONS; RECRUITMENT; MORTALITY; CARDIA;
D O I
10.1249/MSS.0000000000002153
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Purpose Physical activity (PA) intensity is expressed as either absolute or relative intensity. Absolute intensity refers to the energy required to perform an activity. Relative intensity refers to a level of effort that takes into account how hard an individual is working relative to their maximum capacity. We sought to develop methods for obtaining individualized relative-intensity accelerometer cut points using data from a maximal graded exercise treadmill test (GXT) so that each individual has their own cut point. Methods A total of 2363 men and women 38 to 50 yr old from the CARDIA fitness study wore ActiGraph 7164 accelerometers during a maximal GXT and for seven consecutive days in 2005-2006. Using mixed-effects regression models, we regressed accelerometer counts on heart rate as a percentage of maximum (%HRmax) and on RPE. Based on these two models, we obtained a moderate-intensity (%HRmax = 64% or RPE = 12) count cut point that is specific to each participant. We applied these subject-specific cut points to the available CARDIA accelerometer data. Results Using RPE, the mean moderate-intensity accelerometer cut point was 4004 (SD = 1120) counts per minute. On average, cut points were higher for men (4189 counts per minute) versus women (3865 counts per minute) and were higher for Whites (4088 counts per minute) versus African Americans (3896 counts per minute). Cut points were correlated with body mass index (rho = -0.11) and GXT duration (rho = 0.33). Mean daily minutes of absolute- and relative-intensity moderate to vigorous PA were 34.1 (SD = 31.1) min.d(-1) and 9.1 (SD = 18.2) mind(-1), respectively. RPE cut points were higher than those based on %HRmax. This is likely due to some participants ending the GXT before achieving their HRmax. Conclusions Accelerometer-based relative-intensity PA may be a useful measure of intensity relative to maximal capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 407
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individualized Accelerometer Activity Cut-Points for the Measurement of Relative Physical Activity Intensity Levels
    Gil-Rey, Erreka
    Maldonado-Martin, Sara
    Gorostiaga, Esteban M.
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2019, 90 (03) : 327 - 335
  • [2] Moderate and vigorous physical activity intensity cut-points for the Actical accelerometer
    Colley, Rachel C.
    Tremblay, Mark S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2011, 29 (08) : 783 - 789
  • [3] Relative-Intensity Physical Activity and Its Association With Cardiometabolic Disease
    Siddique, Juned
    Welch, Whitney A.
    Aaby, David
    Sternfeld, Barbara
    Pettee Gabriel, Kelley
    Carnethon, Mercedes R.
    Rana, Jamal S.
    Sidney, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (14):
  • [4] Evaluation of Wrist Accelerometer Cut-Points for Classifying Physical Activity Intensity in Youth
    Trost, Stewart G.
    Brookes, Denise S. K.
    Ahmadi, Matthew N.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 4
  • [5] Comparison of Accelerometer Cut Points for Predicting Activity Intensity in Youth
    Trost, Stewart G.
    Loprinzi, Paul D.
    Moore, Rebecca
    Pfeiffer, Karin A.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2011, 43 (07): : 1360 - 1368
  • [6] Accelerometer Cut-Points and Youth Physical Activity Prevalence
    Mota, Jorge
    Valente, Monica
    Aires, Luisa
    Santos, Maria Paula
    Ribeiro, Jose Carlos
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S565 - S565
  • [7] Accelerometer cut-points and youth physical activity prevalence
    Mota, Jorge
    Valente, Monica
    Aires, Luisa
    Silva, Pedro
    Santos, Maria Paula
    Ribeiro, Jose Carlos
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2007, 13 (03) : 287 - 299
  • [8] Beyond cut-points: Introducing a novel accelerometer metric that captures the physical activity intensity distribution
    Rowlands, Alex
    Edwards, Charlotte
    Davies, Melanie
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    Harrington, Deirdre
    Yates, Tom
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10): : S39 - S40
  • [9] Comparison of accelerometer cut points to estimate physical activity in US adults
    Watson, Kathleen B.
    Carlson, Susan A.
    Carroll, Dianna D.
    Fulton, Janet E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2014, 32 (07) : 660 - 669
  • [10] Beyond Cut Points: Accelerometer Metrics that Capture the Physical Activity Profile
    Rowlands, Alex V.
    Edwardson, Charlotte L.
    Davies, Melanie J.
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    Harrington, Deirdre M.
    Yates, Tom
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2018, 50 (06): : 1323 - 1332