Prostate Cancer Ablation with Transrectal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Assessment of Tissue Destruction with Contrast-enhanced US

被引:27
|
作者
Rouviere, Olivier [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Glas, Ludivine [1 ]
Girouin, Nicolas [1 ]
Mege-Lechevallier, Florence [2 ]
Gelet, Albert [3 ,6 ]
Dantony, Emmanuelle [4 ]
Rabilloud, Muriel [4 ,5 ]
Chapelon, Jean-Yves [6 ]
Lyonnet, Denis [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hop Edouard Herriot, Hosp Civils Lyon, Dept Urinary & Vasc Radiol, F-69437 Lyon, France
[2] Hop Edouard Herriot, Hosp Civils Lyon, Dept Pathol, F-69437 Lyon, France
[3] Hop Edouard Herriot, Hosp Civils Lyon, Dept Urol, F-69437 Lyon, France
[4] Hop Edouard Herriot, Hosp Civils Lyon, Dept Biostat, F-69437 Lyon, France
[5] Univ Lyon 1, Fac Med Lyon Est, F-69365 Lyon, France
[6] INSERM, U1032, F-69008 Lyon, France
关键词
IN-VIVO; HIFU; ADENOCARCINOMA; MRI; ELASTOGRAPHY; PREDICT; LESIONS; SPREAD; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.11101489
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess contrast material-enhanced ultrasonographic (US) findings seen after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of prostate cancer and correlate the US findings with post-HIFU biopsy findings. Materials and Methods: The study was ethics committee approved. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-eight patients referred for HIFU prostate cancer ablation underwent contrast-enhanced prostate US before treatment, gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and repeat contrast-enhanced US 1-3 days after treatment, and contrast-enhanced US-guided biopsy 30-45 days after treatment. The contrast-enhanced US enhancement patterns of the biopsy sites-assigned a score of S0 for no enhancement, S1 for mild and/or patchy enhancement, or S2 for marked enhancement-were compared with corresponding biopsy findings, which were assigned a score of B0 for necrosis and/or fibrosis without viable prostate gland tissue, B1 for vascularized tissue without viable gland tissue, or B2 for viable gland tissue (benign or malignant). Then, six additional patients underwent contrast-enhanced prostate US 15-30 minutes and 1 day after HIFU ablation, and the results of these two US examinations were compared. Results: Contrast-enhanced US performed on days 1-3 and days 30-45 after HIFU ablation depicted a large devascularized zone with peripheral enhancing areas that were localized anteriorly in all 28 patients, posteriorly in nine, laterally in five, and at the apex in 20 patients. MR findings were concordant. At biopsy, viable gland tissue was found at nine (6.2%) of 146 S0 sites, 10 (34%) of 29 S1 sites, and 44 (60%) of 73 S2 sites. The odds ratios for finding viable tissue (score B1 or B2) at S1 and S2 sites as opposed to S0 sites were 21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6, 71) and 73 (95% CI: 22, 243), respectively (P < .0001). Contrast-enhanced US performed 15-30 minutes and 1 day after treatment in the six additional patients had similar findings. Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced US is a promising tool for distinguishing between ablated (devascularized) and viable (enhancing) tissue immediately after HIFU treatment. (C)RSNA, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 591
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TRANSRECTAL HIFU ABLATION OF PROSTATE CANCER: ASSESSMENT OF TISSUE DESTRUCTION WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND
    Rouviere, O.
    Glas, L.
    Girouin, N.
    Mege-Lechevallier, F.
    Gelet, A.
    Chapelon, J. Y.
    Lyonnet, D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 356 - 356
  • [2] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound assessment of tissue response to high-intensity focused ultrasound
    Kennedy, JE
    Ter Haar, GR
    Wu, F
    Gleeson, FV
    Roberts, ISD
    Middleton, MR
    Cranston, D
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 30 (06): : 851 - 854
  • [3] CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND (CEUS): EVALUATION OF HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND (HIFU) ABLATION OF THE PROSTATE
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    Freitas, Daniel
    Park, Daniel
    Shin, Toshitaka
    Oishi, Masakatsu
    Fay, Carlos
    Palmer, Suzanne
    Chen, Frank
    Berger, Andre
    Sotelo, Rene
    Grant, Edward
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Gill, Inderbir
    Gulati, Mittul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E377 - E378
  • [4] Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Rebillard, X
    Gelet, A
    Davin, JL
    Soulie, M
    Prapotnich, D
    Cathelineau, X
    Rozet, F
    Vallancien, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) : 693 - 701
  • [5] Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Inoue, Yoji
    Goto, Keisuke
    Hayashi, Tetsutaro
    Hayashi, Mutsuo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 18 (05) : 358 - 363
  • [6] Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of prostate cancer:: Effective treatment requiring accurate imaging
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Souchon, Remi
    Salomir, Rares
    Gelet, Albert
    Chapelon, Jean-Yves
    Lyonnet, Denis
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 63 (03) : 317 - 327
  • [7] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR evaluation of prostate cancer before and after endorectal high-intensity focused ultrasound
    Del Vescovo, R.
    Pisanti, F.
    Russo, V.
    Battisti, S.
    Cazzato, R. L.
    D'Agostino, F.
    Giurazza, F.
    Quattrocchi, C. C.
    Faiella, E.
    Setola, R.
    Giulianelli, R.
    Grasso, R. F.
    Zobel, B. Beomonte
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2013, 118 (05): : 851 - 862
  • [8] Location of residual cancer after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Boutier, Romain
    Girouin, Nicolas
    Ben Cheikh, Alexandre
    Belot, Aurelien
    Rabilloud, Muriel
    Gelet, Albert
    Chapelon, Jean-Yves
    Rouviere, Olivier
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (11) : 1776 - 1781
  • [9] Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography Assessment of Therapeutic Efficacy for Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids: Comparison with Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance
    Wang, Yang
    Wang, Wei
    Ye, Huiyi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2014, 22 (01) : 22 - 28