Evaluation of Oil Spill Detection Models by Oil Spill Distribution Characteristics and CNN Architectures Using Sentinel-1 SAR data

被引:8
|
作者
Park, Soyeon [1 ]
Ahn, Myoung-Hwan [2 ]
Li, Chenglei [1 ]
Kim, Junwoo [1 ]
Jeon, Hyungyun [1 ]
Kim, Duk-jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Climate & Energy Syst Engn, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Sentinel-1; SAR; Oil Spill Detection; CNN; U-net; Oil spill distribution characteristics; SEA-SURFACE; AUTOMATIC DETECTION; IMAGERY;
D O I
10.7780/kjrs.2021.37.5.3.11
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Detecting oil spill area using statistical characteristics of SAR images has limitations in that classification algorithm is complicated and is greatly affected by outliers. To overcome these limitations, studies using neural networks to classify oil spills are recently investigated. However, the studies to evaluate whether the performance of model shows a consistent detection performance for various oil spill cases were insufficient. Therefore, in this study, two CNNs (Convolutional Neural Networks) with basic structures (Simple CNN and U-net) were used to discover whether there is a difference in detection performance according to the structure of CNN and distribution characteristics of oil spill. As a result, through the method proposed in this study, the Simple CNN with contracting path only detected oil spill with an F1 score of 86.24% and U-net, which has both contracting and expansive path showed an F1 score of 91.44%. Both models successfully detected oil spills, but detection performance of the U-net was higher than Simple CNN. Additionally, in order to compare the accuracy of models according to various oil spill cases, the cases were classified into four different categories according to the spatial distribution characteristics of the oil spill (presence of land near the oil spill area) and the clarity of border between oil and seawater. The Simple CNN had F1 score values of 85.71%, 87.43%, 86.50%, and 85.86% for each category, showing the maximum difference of 1.71%. In the case of U-net, the values for each category were 89.77%, 92.27%, 92.59%, and 92.66%, with the maximum difference of 2.90%. Such results indicate that neither model showed significant differences in detection performance by the characteristics of oil spill distribution. However, the difference in detection tendency was caused by the difference in the model structure and the oil spill distribution characteristics. In all four oil spill categories, the Simple CNN showed a tendency to overestimate the oil spill area and the U-net showed a tendency to underestimate it. These tendencies were emphasized when the border between oil and seawater was unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:1475 / 1490
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An open source approach for oil spill detection using Sentinel-1 SAR images
    Konstantinidou, Evangelia Efi
    Kolokoussis, Polychronis
    Topouzelis, Konstantinos
    Moutzouris-Sidiris, Ioannis
    SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REMOTE SENSING AND GEOINFORMATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT (RSCY2019), 2019, 11174
  • [2] Mauritius oil spill detection using transfer learning approach for oil spill mapping and wind impact analysis using Sentinel-1 data
    Das, Koushik
    Janardhan, Prashanth
    Narayana, Harish
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 18 (04)
  • [3] A deep learning based oil spill detector using Sentinel-1 SAR imagery
    Yang, Yi-Jie
    Singha, Suman
    Mayerle, Roberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 43 (11) : 4287 - 4314
  • [4] Semi-automatic Oil Spill Detection in Sentinel-1 SAR Images at Brazil's Coast
    da Silva, Alexandre Correa
    de Branco, William Gomes
    Torquato da Silva, Dagnaldo Penha
    Calvoso Habl, Lui Txai
    Sarmento, Thaise Rachel
    Pascual, Mariano Federico
    NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, APPLICATIONS, AND SERVICES (GEOPROCESSING 2017), 2017, : 1 - 5
  • [5] An assessment of oil spill detection using Sentinel 1 SAR-C images
    Chaturvedi, Sudhir Kumar
    Banerjee, Saikat
    Lele, Shashank
    JOURNAL OF OCEAN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2020, 5 (02) : 116 - 135
  • [6] Geochemical analysis of SAR backscattering (Sentinel-1) on global ocean oil spill cases
    de Souza Junior, Jose Milton Neves
    de Mendonca, Luis Felipe Ferreira
    Costa, Heverton da Silva
    Costi, Juliana
    Vasconcelos, Rodrigo Nogueira
    Lima, Andre Telles da Cunha
    Sant'anna, Sidnei Joao Siqueira
    Lopes, Jose Marques
    Porsani, Milton Jose
    de Miranda, Jose Vivas Garica
    Lentini, Carlos Alessandre Domingos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 56 (01)
  • [7] Integral solution for oil spill detection using SAR data
    Gershenzon, Olga Nickolaevna
    2007 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT ADVANCES IN SPACE TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 361 - 365
  • [8] A DEEP LEARNING BASED SELF-EVOLVING OIL SPILL DETECTION ALGORITHM USING SENTINEL-1 SAR IMAGES
    Li, Chenglei
    Park, Soyeon
    Kim, Duk-jin
    Kim, Junwoo
    IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 1289 - 1292
  • [9] Deep neural network for oil spill detection using Sentinel-1 data: application to Egyptian coastal regions
    Ahmed, Samira
    ElGharbawi, Tamer
    Salah, Mahmoud
    El-Mewafi, Mahmoud
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2023, 14 (01) : 76 - 94
  • [10] Change Detection Analysis Using Sentinel-1 Satellite Data with SNAP and GEE Regarding Oil Spill in Venezuela
    Caporusso, Giacomo
    Gallo, Cristian
    Tarantino, Eufemia
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2022 WORKSHOPS, PART III, 2022, 13379 : 387 - 404