Comparison of aortic arch and carotid sinus distensibility in humans -: relation to baroreflex sensitivity

被引:23
|
作者
Lénárd, Z
Studinger, P
Kováts, Z
Reneman, R
Kollai, M
机构
[1] Semmelweis Univ, Inst Human Physiol & Clin Expt Res, H-1082 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Maastricht Univ, Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, Dept Physiol, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
关键词
ultrasound; echo-track; arterial; elasticity; age;
D O I
10.1016/S1566-0702(01)00309-5
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We compared aortic arch (AA) and carotid sinus (CS) distensibility, and determined the relationship between baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and distensibility coefficients of AA and CS (DCAA and DCCS, respectively). In 47 healthy 19-71-year-old subjects, AA and CS end-diastolic diameter (D) and pulsatile distension (DeltaD) was measured with ultrasound and arterial pressure by sphygmomanometer and Finapres. DC was calculated as 2 DeltaD/(DX DeltaP), where DeltaP is the pulse pressure. BRS was determined by the sequence method. Data are given as mean +/-S.D.; significance was set at p < 0.05. DCAA and DCCS were linearly related across subjects (r = 0.80, p < 0.001). No difference between DCAA and DCCS (3.8 +/- 1.4 x 10(-3) and 4.2 +/- 2.2 x 10(-3) mm Hg-1, respectively) was found for all subjects (paired t-test). However, at ages < 35 years, DCCS exceeded DCAA, whereas this relation was reversed at ages > 35 years. Age accounted for 53% of variability in DCAA and 73% of variability in DCCS. BRS was related to DC (linear regression), with the BRS-DCAA relation being steeper and closer (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) than the BRS-DCCS relation (r = 0.54, p < 0.05). It is suggested that aortic baroreceptors may have a dominant role in heart rate control. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 99
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of aortic arch and carotid sinus distensibility and their relation to baroreflex sensitivity
    Lénárd, Z
    Studinger, P
    Jokkel, G
    Kollai, M
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2000, 526 : 146P - 147P
  • [2] Carotid distensibility, baroreflex sensitivity, and orthostatic stress
    Steinback, CD
    O'Leary, DD
    Bakker, J
    Cechetto, AD
    Ladak, HM
    Shoemaker, JK
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 99 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [3] Relation between baroreflex sensitivity and carotid artery elasticity in healthy humans
    Bonyhay, I
    Jokkel, G
    Kollai, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 271 (03): : H1139 - H1144
  • [4] Comparison of aortic and carotid baroreflex stimulus-response characteristics in humans
    Smith, SA
    Querry, RG
    Fadel, PJ
    Weiss, MW
    Olivencia-Yurvati, A
    Shi, XR
    Raven, PB
    AUTONOMIC NEUROSCIENCE-BASIC & CLINICAL, 2001, 88 (1-2): : 74 - 85
  • [5] BAROREFLEX SENSITIVITY IN CAROTID-SINUS SYNDROME
    HOSSMANN, V
    PINGER, S
    HOCHEL, S
    GROTZ, J
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 8 (03): : A106 - A106
  • [6] Counteraction of aortic baroreflex to carotid sinus baroreflex in a neck suction model
    Kawada, T
    Inagaki, M
    Takaki, H
    Sato, T
    Shishido, T
    Tatewaki, T
    Yanagiya, Y
    Sugimachi, M
    Sunagawa, K
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 89 (05) : 1979 - 1984
  • [7] DOES THE CAROTID-SINUS BAROREFLEX RESET IN HUMANS
    BERGEL, DH
    RICHMOND, PH
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1990, 430 : P34 - P34
  • [8] QUANTITATIVE EXAMINATION OF THE CAROTID-SINUS BAROREFLEX IN HUMANS
    VOGT, A
    KREUZER, H
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 1986, 75 : 83 - 83
  • [9] INTERACTION OF MUSCLE CHEMOREFLEX AND CAROTID-SINUS BAROREFLEX IN HUMANS
    PAPELIER, Y
    HELLOCO, F
    ESCOURROU, P
    ROWELL, LB
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1993, 7 (04): : A748 - A748
  • [10] Muscle chemoreflex alters carotid sinus baroreflex response in humans
    Papelier, Y
    Escourrou, P
    Helloco, F
    Rowell, LB
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 82 (02) : 577 - 583