Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Kato, Seiji [1 ]
Kamijima, Shuichi [1 ]
Inaoka, Tsutomu [2 ]
Kamiya, Naoto [1 ]
Sasai, Daisuke [3 ,4 ]
Terada, Hitoshi [2 ]
Hiruta, Nobuyuki [3 ]
Suzuki, Hiroyoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Toho Univ, Sakura Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Sakura, Chiba 2858741, Japan
[2] Toho Univ, Sakura Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Sakura, Chiba, Japan
[3] Toho Univ, Sakura Med Ctr, Dept Surg Pathol, Sakura, Chiba, Japan
[4] Seirei Sakura Citizen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Sakura, Japan
关键词
Prostate cancer; multiparametric MRI; apparent diffusion coefficient; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; TARGETED BIOPSY; MRI; METASTASES; PATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2018.1481143
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) have been reported to correlate with high-Gleason score (GS) prostate cancer. However, the relative ADC values between tumor lesions and normal tissue have been suggested as more suitable than the absolute ADC values for evaluation of diffusion abnormalities, because absolute ADC values are susceptible to differences in scanners or scanner settings. The present study evaluated the usefulness of the relative assessment of ADC values between tumor lesions and normal tissue on preoperative mpMRl for the prediction of high-risk prostate cancer on radical prostatectomy specimens. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 48 men who underwent radical prostatectomy between January 2013 and December 2014 was conducted. MpMRI was performed with a 3.0-T scanner using b-values of 0 and 1500 s/mm(2). ADC values of the tumor (ADC(TUMOR)) and normal prostate and the relative ADC tumor/normal ratio (ADC(TNR)) were evaluated by two radiologists. Results: The inter-rater reliability between two radiologists for ADC(TUMOR) measurement was high, with Pearson's r= 0.982. There was no difference in ADC(TUMOR) between GS <= 7 and GS >= 8. In contrast, ADC TNR was significantly lower in GS >= 8 than in GS <= 7. ROC curves of ADC TNR to predict higher GS (>= 8) showed better classification performance (AUC =0.8243, p=.0012 by radiologist A and AUC = 0.7961, p= .0031 by radiologist B) than of ADC(TUMOR). Conclusions: The relative assessment of ADC values between tumor lesions and normal tissue could improve the detection rate of high-risk prostate cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 185
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4
    Hwanik Kim
    Jung Kwon Kim
    Sung Kyu Hong
    Chang Wook Jeong
    Ja Hyeon Ku
    Cheol Kwak
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1825 - 1830
  • [2] Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3+4
    Kim, Hwanik
    Kim, Jung Kwon
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 1825 - 1830
  • [3] Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance Imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3+4
    Kim, Hwanik
    Kim, Jung Kwon
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Ye, Changhee
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 64 - 65
  • [4] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate Repeatability of Volume and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Quantification
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Vangel, Mark G.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2017, 52 (09) : 538 - 546
  • [5] Can Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict a High Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer?
    Shigemura, Katsumi
    Yamanaka, Nozomu
    Yamashita, Masuo
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 54 (04) : 234 - 238
  • [6] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer improves Gleason score assessment in favorable risk prostate cancer
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Dorey, Fred
    Lieu, Patricia
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    [J]. PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5 (06) : 411 - 416
  • [7] Relationship between Gleason score and apparent diffusion coefficients of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer patients
    Kim, Tae Heon
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byung Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Choi, Han Yong
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (11-12): : E377 - E382
  • [8] Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted MR imaging and Gleason score in prostate cancer
    Wu, X.
    Reinikainen, P.
    Vanhanen, A.
    Kapanen, M.
    Vierikko, T.
    Ryymin, P.
    Hyodynmaa, S.
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P. -L.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [9] Correlations between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Gleason Score in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Surov, Alexey
    Meyer, Hans Jonas
    Wienke, Andreas
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (04): : 489 - 497
  • [10] Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer
    Turkbey, Baris
    Brown, Anna M.
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2016, 66 (04) : 326 - 336