The pan-cancer landscape of prognostic germline variants in 10,582 patients

被引:23
|
作者
Chatrath, Ajay [1 ]
Przanowska, Roza [1 ]
Kiran, Shashi [1 ]
Su, Zhangli [1 ]
Saha, Shekhar [1 ]
Wilson, Briana [1 ]
Tsunematsu, Takaaki [1 ]
Ahn, Ji-Hye [1 ]
Lee, Kyung Yong [1 ]
Paulsen, Teressa [1 ]
Sobierajska, Ewelina [1 ]
Kiran, Manjari [2 ]
Tang, Xiwei [3 ]
Li, Tianxi [3 ]
Kumar, Pankaj [1 ]
Ratan, Aakrosh [4 ]
Dutta, Anindya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Dept Biochem & Mol Genet, 1240 Pinn Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ Hyderabad, Sch Life Sci, Dept Syst & Computat Biol, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Stat, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Ctr Publ Hlth Genom, Charlottesville, VA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Germline variants; Single nucleotide polymorphism; Cancer biology; Pan-cancer; Survival analysis; Tumor suppressor; Oncogene; Driver gene; Non-synonymous mutation; eQTL; BREAST-CANCER; MUTATION; SUSCEPTIBILITY; TOXICITY; GENES; POLYMORPHISMS; ASSOCIATION; SENSITIVITY; PREVALENCE; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1186/s13073-020-0718-7
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background While clinical factors such as age, grade, stage, and histological subtype provide physicians with information about patient prognosis, genomic data can further improve these predictions. Previous studies have shown that germline variants in known cancer driver genes are predictive of patient outcome, but no study has systematically analyzed multiple cancers in an unbiased way to identify genetic loci that can improve patient outcome predictions made using clinical factors. Methods We analyzed sequencing data from the over 10,000 cancer patients available through The Cancer Genome Atlas to identify germline variants associated with patient outcome using multivariate Cox regression models. Results We identified 79 prognostic germline variants in individual cancers and 112 prognostic germline variants in groups of cancers. The germline variants identified in individual cancers provide additional predictive power about patient outcomes beyond clinical information currently in use and may therefore augment clinical decisions based on expected tumor aggressiveness. Molecularly, at least 12 of the germline variants are likely associated with patient outcome through perturbation of protein structure and at least five through association with gene expression differences. Almost half of these germline variants are in previously reported tumor suppressors, oncogenes or cancer driver genes with the other half pointing to genomic loci that should be further investigated for their roles in cancers. Conclusions Germline variants are predictive of outcome in cancer patients and specific germline variants can improve patient outcome predictions beyond predictions made using clinical factors alone. The germline variants also implicate new means by which known oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and driver genes are perturbed in cancer and suggest roles in cancer for other genes that have not been extensively studied in oncology. Further studies in other cancer cohorts are necessary to confirm that germline variation is associated with outcome in cancer patients as this is a proof-of-principle study.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The pan-cancer landscape of prognostic germline variants in 10,582 patients
    Ajay Chatrath
    Roza Przanowska
    Shashi Kiran
    Zhangli Su
    Shekhar Saha
    Briana Wilson
    Takaaki Tsunematsu
    Ji-Hye Ahn
    Kyung Yong Lee
    Teressa Paulsen
    Ewelina Sobierajska
    Manjari Kiran
    Xiwei Tang
    Tianxi Li
    Pankaj Kumar
    Aakrosh Ratan
    Anindya Dutta
    Genome Medicine, 12
  • [2] Disparities in cancer genetics care by race/ethnicity among pan-cancer patients with pathogenic germline variants
    Liu, Ying L.
    Maio, Anna
    Kemel, Yelena
    Salo-Mullen, Erin E.
    Sheehan, Margaret
    Tejada, Prince Ray
    Trottier, Magan
    Arnold, Angela G.
    Fleischut, Megan Harlan
    Latham, Alicia
    Carlo, Maria, I
    Murciano-Goroff, Yonina R.
    Walsh, Michael F.
    Mandelker, Diana
    Mehta, Nikita
    Bandlamudi, Chaitanya
    Arora, Kanika
    Zehir, Ahmet
    Berger, Michael F.
    Solit, David B.
    Aghajanian, Carol
    Diaz, Luis A., Jr.
    Robson, Mark E.
    Brown, Carol L.
    Offit, Kenneth
    Hamilton, Jada G.
    Stadler, Zsofia K.
    CANCER, 2022, 128 (21) : 3870 - 3879
  • [3] The pan-cancer pathological regulatory landscape
    Falco, Matias M.
    Bleda, Marta
    Carbonell-Caballero, Jose
    Dopazo, Joaquin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [4] The pan-cancer pathological regulatory landscape
    Matias M. Falco
    Marta Bleda
    José Carbonell-Caballero
    Joaquín Dopazo
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [5] A pan-cancer analysis of prognostic genesl
    Anaya, Jordan
    Reon, Brian
    Chen, Wei-Min
    Bekiranov, Stefan
    Duna, Anindya
    PEERJ, 2016, 4
  • [6] Immunological role and prognostic potential of CLEC10A in pan-cancer
    Qin, Yan
    Wang, Lulu
    Zhang, Lihua
    Li, Jiasheng
    Liao, Lixian
    Huang, Lihaoyun
    Li, Wei
    Yang, Jianrong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 14 (05): : 2844 - +
  • [7] Substantial batch effects in TCGA exome sequences undermine pan-cancer analysis of germline variants
    Roni Rasnic
    Nadav Brandes
    Or Zuk
    Michal Linial
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [8] A Risk Score for Predicting Mortality in in 10,582 Patients Hospitalized With Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy
    Kao, David P.
    Lindenfeld, JoAnn
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130
  • [9] Substantial batch effects in TCGA exome sequences undermine pan-cancer analysis of germline variants
    Rasnic, Roni
    Brandes, Nadav
    Zuk, Or
    Linial, Michal
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [10] Implementation of universal, pan-cancer germline genetic testing in patients with cancer in Jordan.
    Abdel-Razeq, Hikmat
    Tbakhi, Abdelghani
    Abuhijlih, Ramiz
    Abujamous, Lama
    Al Masri, Mahmoud
    Abukhashabeh, Razan
    Mitchell, Asia
    Heald, Brandie
    Nielsen, Sarah M.
    Nussbaum, Robert Luke
    Esplin, Edward D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)