OPTIMAL TOPOLOGY OF RETAINING WALL

被引:1
|
作者
Yegorov, Y.
Kucherenko, O.
机构
关键词
retaining wall; topology; optimization; discretization; filter; evolutionary structural optimization; SIMP method;
D O I
10.32347/2410-2547.2022.108.369-376
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
This paper intends to present an approach to the problem of the optimal cross-section topology of a retaining wall. We use the Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) method to solve this problem. An isotropic solid is divided into n quadrilateral finite elements, and each such element e is associated with a design variable x(e) which might be regarded as a material density. The notion of a virtual Young's modulus is introduced, and for each element it can be approximated as follows: E-e (x(e)) = E-min + x(e)(p) (E-0 - E-min), where p is a penalty, which is usually equal to 3; E-min. is a small value of the modulus, which we use in order to avoid the singularity of a stiffness matrix; E-0 is the Young's modulus of the material. Thus when the condition 0 <= x(e)(p) <= 1 is satisfied E-e varies between a certain minimum value E-min and the usual Young's modulus E-0. We regard a retaining wall with a solid cross-section in the form of a rectangle with a height to base ratio of 3:1 to demonstrate the proposed approach. Along its entire height the wall is under the pressure of soil, which varies linearly from 0 to 1. In general, this corresponds to hydrostatic pressure. From the standpoint of the theory of elasticity such a problem can be considered as planar. The problem of the optimal topology shrinks to the mathematical programming problem in the form of F-T u(x) -> min(u) under certain conditions (here F is a vector of external forces, u(x) is a vector of displacements, x is a vector of densities). The objective function can be interpreted as the work done by external forces to deform the system, thus we tend to find the stiffest body of a certain volume. To solve mathematical programming problem we use Python programming language, and Numpy and Scipy packages. To eliminate the "checkerboard problem" (alternation of black and white cells) we apply a Gaussian filter from the Skimage package. The parameters of the obtained model are described in ANSYS Parametric Design Language and exported to Ansys Mechanical for further analysis. It is determined that the maximum von Mises stress in the structure with the optimal topology and the prescribed volume fraction of 60% does not exceed this value in the retaining wall with a base rectangular cross section.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 376
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OPTIMAL COST OF SLOPE STABILIZATION WITH RETAINING WALL
    Bari, Fathol
    Repadi, Julita Andrini
    Andriani
    Ismail, Febrin Anas
    Hakam, Abdul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATE, 2022, 22 (93): : 83 - 90
  • [2] RETAINING WALL
    不详
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1984, 54 (07): : 54 - 55
  • [3] 'RETAINING WALL'
    KEPPEL, T
    [J]. CAROLINA QUARTERLY, 1979, 31 (02): : 9 - 20
  • [4] 'Retaining wall'
    Hughes, Henry
    [J]. QUEENS QUARTERLY, 2008, 115 (02) : 313 - 313
  • [5] SCULPTURED RETAINING WALL
    不详
    [J]. CONCRETE, 1973, 7 (03): : 43 - 43
  • [6] Plasma Generation Optimization for Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Cantilever Retaining Wall Structures
    Kaveh, Ali
    Akbari, Hossein
    Hosseini, Seyed Milad
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 46 (02) : 1177 - 1200
  • [7] Plasma Generation Optimization for Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Cantilever Retaining Wall Structures
    Ali Kaveh
    Hossein Akbari
    Seyed Milad Hosseini
    [J]. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2022, 46 : 1177 - 1200
  • [8] Performance of a cantilever retaining wall
    Bentler, Joseph G.
    Labuz, Joseph F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (08) : 1062 - 1070
  • [9] Retaining Wall Surface Optimization
    Babaiev, Volodymyr
    Shmukler, Valeriy
    Kalmykov, Oleg
    [J]. SMART TECHNOLOGIES IN URBAN ENGINEERING, STUE-2022, 2023, 536 : 115 - 127
  • [10] A RECONSIDERATION OF RETAINING WALL DESIGN
    INGOLD, TS
    [J]. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER-PART B, 1982, 60 (04): : 83 - 91