Assessing sustainability environmental performance of three urban agglomerations in China: An input-output modeling approach

被引:19
|
作者
Cui, Zhe [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Feng [1 ]
Ren, Fangrong [3 ]
Zhang, Xuan [2 ]
Jing, Zhiye [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, 96 JinZhai Rd, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Nantong Univ, Econ & Management Sch, 9 Seyuan Rd, Nantong 226019, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
关键词
Efficiency evaluation; Dynamic DEA Model; Three main urban agglomerations; Regional environmental quality; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; AIR-POLLUTION; ECO-EFFICIENCY; DEA MODEL; PRODUCTIVITY; QUALITY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108079
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
As a special form of a cluster city, urban agglomeration has become an important platform to support national economic growth and to participate in international competition and cooperation, but it faces severe environmental problems. This research thus selects panel data of 60 cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration (BTH), Yangtze River Delta (YRD), and Pearl River Delta (PRD) from 2013 to 2017. Based on the input-output perspective, labor and energy consumption per GDP are selected as input indicators, GDP, PM2.5, SO2, industrial smoke and dust emissions, and wastewater discharged as output indicators, and fixed assets as a carry-over variable in the dynamic DEA model to evaluate and analyze the environmental efficiencies of these three urban agglomerations. Findings show that their total environmental efficiency exhibits a wave-like development trend, and that the total efficiency score of BTH is better than that of PRD and YRD. From the viewpoint of a sub-efficiency index, PM2.5 is the lowest in unexpected output, where its average five-year efficiency score is 0.9847, while the average score of industrial smoke and dust emissions efficiency is the lowest at 0.6199. Finally, this paper offers suggestions for different problems facing the three urban agglomerations.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing sustainability performance of global supply chains: An input-output modeling approach
    Wang, H.
    Pan, Chen
    Wang, Qunwei
    Zhou, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 285 (01) : 393 - 404
  • [2] Input-Output Efficiency of Urban Agglomerations in China: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
    Fang, ChuangLin
    Guan, XingLiang
    Lu, ShaSha
    Zhou, Min
    Deng, Yu
    [J]. URBAN STUDIES, 2013, 50 (13) : 2766 - 2790
  • [3] INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING
    AHMED, SB
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1973, SMC3 (06): : 537 - 538
  • [4] Input-output modeling for assessing cascading effects
    Gallagher, MA
    Snodgrass, CAW
    Ehlers, MGJ
    [J]. MILITARY OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2005, 10 (02) : 5 - 17
  • [5] A novel approach to stochastic input-output modeling
    Kozicka, Marta
    [J]. RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 53 (04) : 1155 - 1169
  • [6] THE INPUT-OUTPUT MODELING APPROACH TO THE NATIONAL ECONOMY
    Gaftea, Viorel
    [J]. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC FORECASTING, 2013, 16 (02): : 211 - 222
  • [7] ENVIRONMENTAL REPERCUSSIONS AND ECONOMIC STRUCTURE - INPUT-OUTPUT APPROACH
    LEONTIEF, W
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1970, 52 (03) : 262 - 271
  • [8] Analysis of resource allocation and environmental performance in China’s three major urban agglomerations
    Jiasen Sun
    Zheng Wang
    Qingyuan Zhu
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 34289 - 34299
  • [9] Analysis of resource allocation and environmental performance in China's three major urban agglomerations
    Sun, Jiasen
    Wang, Zheng
    Zhu, Qingyuan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (27) : 34289 - 34299
  • [10] A DETERMINISTIC APPROACH TO APPROXIMATE MODELING OF INPUT-OUTPUT DATA
    VANDENHOF, P
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-3, 1989, : 659 - 664