Cost Effectiveness of Patient Self-Managed Warfarin Compared with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: An Economic Evaluation in a Danish Healthcare Sector Setting

被引:2
|
作者
Raunbak, Sabine Michelsen [1 ]
Sorensen, Anne Sig [1 ,2 ]
Hansen, Louise [1 ,3 ]
Skjoth, Flemming [4 ,5 ]
Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard [4 ,6 ]
Ehlers, Lars Holger [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Fac Hlth, Danish Ctr Healthcare Improvements, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Danish Hlth Technol Council, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Contracts & Trial Nat, North Denmark Reg, Legal Dept, Aalborg, Denmark
[4] Aalborg Univ, Fac Hlth, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg Thrombosis Res Unit, Aalborg, Denmark
[5] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Unit Clin Biostat, Aalborg, Denmark
[6] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
STROKE PREVENTION; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; DABIGATRAN; APIXABAN; ASPIRIN;
D O I
10.1007/s41669-022-00337-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background Patient self-managed anticoagulant treatment with warfarin (PSM) has been proposed as an alternative to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF); however, direct evidence on the cost effectiveness of PSM compared with DOACs is lacking. We aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of PSM versus DOACs for NVAF patients in the Danish healthcare setting using a model-based cost-utility analysis. Methods A cost-utility analysis was performed using a decision-analytic model including two treatment alternatives: continuous PSM and DOACs. The analysis was performed from an extended Danish healthcare sector perspective, including patient-paid costs of medication related to the anticoagulant treatment, with a lifetime horizon. Inputs for the model comprised of probabilities of events, costs in Danish estimates, when possible, and effect in utilities. The probabilities of events are primarily based on real-life data from a direct comparison of PSM and DOACs. The results are presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with an assumed cost-effectiveness threshold of 20,000 pound/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the robustness of the results. Results The base-analysis showed that PSM was dominant, with a decreased cost of 8495 pound and an increased QALY accumulation of 0.23 per patient (ICER = -36,935 pound/QALY). All deterministic sensitivity analyses indicated that PSM was dominant or at least cost effective. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that 95% of the iterations were cost effective. Conclusions The present study found that PSM is dominant (i.e., both more effective and cost saving) compared with DOACs, adding to the scarce evidence of the comparative cost effectiveness of PSM and DOACs in NVAF.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 494
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost Effectiveness of Patient Self-Managed Warfarin Compared with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: An Economic Evaluation in a Danish Healthcare Sector Setting
    Sabine Michelsen Raunbak
    Anne Sig Sørensen
    Louise Hansen
    Flemming Skjøth
    Torben Bjerregaard Larsen
    Lars Holger Ehlers
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2022, 6 : 483 - 494
  • [2] Effectiveness and safety of self-managed oral anticoagulant therapy compared with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Grove, Erik Lerkevang
    Skjoth, Flemming
    Nielsen, Peter Bronnum
    Christensen, Thomas Decker
    Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [3] Effectiveness and safety of self-managed oral anticoagulant therapy compared with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Erik Lerkevang Grove
    Flemming Skjøth
    Peter Brønnum Nielsen
    Thomas Decker Christensen
    Torben Bjerregaard Larsen
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 8
  • [4] Effectiveness and safety of self-managed oral anticoagulant therapy compared with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a propensity-weighted cohort study
    Grove, E. L.
    Skjoeth, F.
    Nielsen, P. B.
    Christensen, T. D.
    Larsen, T. B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 609 - 609
  • [5] Safety and Effectiveness of Dabigatran and Other Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Huybrechts, Krista F.
    Gopalakrishnan, Chandrasekar
    Bartels, Dorothee B.
    Zint, Kristina
    Gurusamy, Venkatesh K.
    Landon, Joan
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 107 (06) : 1405 - 1419
  • [6] Safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in cirrhotic patients with atrial fibrillation
    Yoo, Seo Yeon
    Kim, Eunju
    Nam, Gi-Byoung
    Lee, Danbi
    Shim, Ju Hyun
    Kim, Kang Mo
    Lim, Young-Suk
    Lee, Han Chu
    Chung, Young-Hwa
    Lee, Yung Sang
    Choi, Jonggi
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (03): : 555 - 566
  • [7] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS VERSUS WARFARIN IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
    Done, N.
    Li, D.
    Woolley, A.
    Rose, A. J.
    Prentice, J. C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S6 - S7
  • [8] Comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation
    Shah, Surbhi
    Norby, Faye L.
    Datta, Yvonne H.
    Lutsey, Pamela L.
    MacLehose, Richard F.
    Chen, Lin Y.
    Alonso, Alvaro
    [J]. BLOOD ADVANCES, 2018, 2 (03) : 200 - 209
  • [9] COST EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS (DOACS) COMPARED WITH WARFARIN: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Huang, Y.
    Chen, S. H.
    Wang, Y.
    Zhao, B.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S60 - S60
  • [10] Cost effectiveness analysis of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin and aspirin for stroke prevention atrial fibrillation in the Indonesian healthcare setting
    Kristin, Erna
    Dwiprahasto, Iwan
    Endarti, Dwi
    Pinzon, Rizaldy Taslim
    Yasmina, Alfi
    At Thobari, Jarir
    Pratiwi, Woro Rukmi
    Kartika, Yolanda Dyah
    Trijayanti, Christiana
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 28 : 298 - 298