Higher Education Management and Student Achievement Assessment Method Based on Clustering Algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Zhihui [1 ]
机构
[1] Huanghe S&T Univ, Zhengzhou 450005, Peoples R China
关键词
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1155/2022/4703975
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Monitoring and guiding instructional management require student performance evaluation. Traditional evaluation and analysis methods based on absolute scores, on the other hand, have certain flaws and are unable to fully reflect the information contained in student performance, thus limiting the impact of student performance evaluation on teaching and learning management. Data mining is regarded as the backbone technology for future information processing, and it introduces a new concept to the way humans use data. Schools must analyse and evaluate the performance of students in the same grade level and secondary school in a timely and staged manner. Clustering is a type of data mining that uses similarity rules to classify sample data into groups with a high degree of similarity. To address the difficulties caused by the wide variation in course difficulty in student performance evaluation, a method based on the K-means clustering algorithm is proposed. The K-means algorithm and the improved K-means algorithm with student information are investigated. The test results showed that the K-means clustering algorithm, the improved algorithm in this paper, and the fast global mean clustering algorithm all cluster the same randomly generated data set with noisy points, but the clustering time of the algorithm in this paper is only 0.04, which has obvious advantages. As a result, the clustering algorithm-based higher education management and student performance evaluation mechanism provides some insights for future research on student learning patterns. It is hoped that instructional administrators will gain a better understanding of students' learning characteristics so that they can better guide their teaching.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Construction of Higher Education Management and Student Achievement Evaluation Mechanism Based on Apriori Algorithm
    Liu, Dongdong
    [J]. MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 2022
  • [2] A New Student Achievement Evaluation Method Based on k-means Clustering Algorithm
    Xi, Sumei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION REFORM AND MODERN MANAGEMENT (ERMM 2015), 2015, 15 : 175 - 178
  • [3] Grading student achievement in higher education
    Elton, Lewis
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (04) : 761 - 762
  • [4] Student clustering procedure according to dropout risk to improve student management in higher education
    Hinojosa, Mauricio
    Derpich, Ivan
    Alfaro, Miguel
    Ruete, David
    Caroca, Alejandro
    Gatica, Gustavo
    [J]. TEXTO LIVRE-LINGUAGEM E TECNOLOGIA, 2022, 15
  • [5] Grading Student Achievement in Higher Education: Signals and Shortcomings
    Klinger, Don A.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 38 (03): : 97 - 100
  • [6] A study of higher education student achievement based on transformative and lifelong learning processes
    Flumerfelt, Shannon
    Ingram, Ilene
    Brockberg, Kevin
    Smith, Julia
    [J]. MENTORING & TUTORING, 2007, 15 (01): : 107 - 118
  • [7] Grading Student Achievement in Higher Education: Signals and Shortcomings
    Black, Kim
    [J]. REVIEW OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 34 (03): : 505 - 506
  • [8] Grading student achievement in higher education: signals and shortcomings
    Rees, Terri
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 33 (04) : 506 - 507
  • [9] Student involvement and management of students' workload in formative assessment in higher education
    Hortigueela-Alcala, David
    Perez-Pueyo, Angel
    Lopez-Pastor, Victor
    [J]. RELIEVE-REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION Y EVALUACION EDUCATIVA, 2015, 21 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [10] Summary of assessment in higher education and the management of student-learning data
    Moskal, Patrick
    Ellis, Taylor
    Keon, Thomas
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2008, 7 (02) : 269 - 278