Environmental performance of manure co-digestion with natural and cultivated grass - A consequential life cycle assessment

被引:31
|
作者
Pehme, Sirli [1 ]
Veromann, Eve [1 ]
Hamelin, Lorie [2 ]
机构
[1] Estonian Univ Life Sci, Inst Agr & Environm Sci, Kreutzwaldi 5, EE-51014 Tartu, Estonia
[2] Inst Soil Sci & Plant Cultivat, Dept Bioecon & Syst Anal, Czartmyskich 8 Str, PL-24100 Pulawy, Poland
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Consequential life cycle assessment; Land use changes; Reed canary grass; Semi-natural grassland; REED CANARY GRASS; LAND-USE IMPACTS; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; BIOENERGY PRODUCTION; SUSTAINABLE BIOGAS; METHANE YIELD; ENERGY CROPS; EFFICIENCY; SLURRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.067
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the environmental consequences of increased manure-based biogas production relying on grass as a co-substrate (from both unused and cultivated boreal grasslands). Through consequential life cycle assessment, three biogas scenarios were investigated: i) mono-digestion of dairy cow manure, ii) manure co-digestion with reed canary grass cultivated specifically for bioenergy production and iii) manure co-digestion with unused grass from semi-natural grasslands. A full balance of biogenic carbon was considered including soil carbon changes and indirect land use changes. Mono digestion of manure showed a potential for an improved environmental performance for global warming and phosphorus-eutrophication, in comparison to conventional manure management, but yielded more than 2 times lower energy production compared to co-digestion. Co-digestion with grass from semi natural grasslands showed an even 41% better potential to reduce global warming and resulted 2 times lower phosphorus-eutrophication compared to mono-digestion, provided that the grass would have otherwise been left un-harvested on land. Because of the indirect land use change associated with an additional demand for land, and the need for additional fertilizers, co-digestion with cultivated grass showed a 26% worse global warming, 2 times higher acidification, 4 times higher nitrogen-eutrophication and 36% worse phosphorus-eutrophication performance compared to natural grass. Results highlighted that grass co-digestion with manure does lead to an enhanced performance of the global warming and phosphorus-induced eutrophication impacts. This conclusion, however, did not apply for nitrogen-related impacts categories (acidification and nitrogen-induced eutrophication). Results were strongly affected by the choice of the indirect land use change factor for modelling and the energy source displaced. In a nutshell, this study highlighted the environmental relevance of considering energy grass and in particular semi-natural grasslands for the production of manure-based biogas, though it showed the necessity to improve the nitrogen balance of the supply chain of these scenarios, and to carefully consider the counterfactual use of the grass stream. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1143
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative life cycle assessment of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of livestock manure in Bangladesh
    Hossain, Samira
    Akter, Shammi
    Saha, Chayan Kumer
    Reza, Toufiq
    Kabir, Kazi Bayzid
    Kirtania, Kawnish
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 157 : 100 - 109
  • [2] Life Cycle Assessment of Two Alkaline Pretreatments of Sorghum and Miscanthus and of Their Batch Co-digestion with Cow Manure
    Colin Jury
    Hélène Laurence Thomas
    Hélène Carrère
    [J]. BioEnergy Research, 2022, 15 : 810 - 833
  • [3] Life Cycle Assessment of Two Alkaline Pretreatments of Sorghum and Miscanthus and of Their Batch Co-digestion with Cow Manure
    Jury, Colin
    Thomas, Helene Laurence
    Carrere, Helene
    [J]. BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (02) : 810 - 833
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of biogas production through anaerobic co-digestion of nopal cladodes and dairy cow manure
    Rafael Ramirez-Arpide, Felix
    Demirer, Goksel N.
    Gallegos-Vazquez, Clemente
    Hernandez-Eugenio, Guadalupe
    Horacio Santoyo-Cortes, Vinicio
    Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 2313 - 2322
  • [5] Anaerobic co-digestion of grass and cow manure: kinetic and GHG calculations
    Ulukardesler, Ayse Hilal
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [6] Anaerobic co-digestion of grass and forbs - Influence of cattle manure or grass based inoculum
    Cong, Wen-Feng
    Moset, Veronica
    Feng, Lu
    Moller, Henrik Bjarne
    Eriksen, Jurgen
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 119 : 90 - 96
  • [7] Anaerobic co-digestion of grass and cow manure: kinetic and GHG calculations
    Ayse Hilal Ulukardesler
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [8] Anaerobic digestion of poultry litter - A consequential life cycle assessment
    Beausang, Ciara
    McDonnell, Kevin
    Murphy, Fionnuala
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 735
  • [9] Anaerobic co-digestion of mango leaves and pig manure: performance assessment and kinetic analysis
    Zaidun Naji Abudi
    Zhiquan Hu
    Alkhafaji R. Abood
    [J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2022, 12 : 275 - 285
  • [10] Anaerobic co-digestion of mango leaves and pig manure: performance assessment and kinetic analysis
    Abudi, Zaidun Naji
    Hu, Zhiquan
    Abood, Alkhafaji R.
    [J]. BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2022, 12 (02) : 275 - 285