Performance evaluation of filtered backprojection reconstruction and iterative reconstruction methods for PET images

被引:46
|
作者
Wang, CX
Snyder, WE
Bilbro, G [1 ]
Santago, P
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
image reconstruction; performance evaluation; PET imaging; bias and variance; mean square error;
D O I
10.1016/S0010-4825(97)00031-0
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithm and statistical model based iterative algorithms such as the maximum likelihood (ML) reconstruction or the maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstruction are the two major classes of tomographic reconstruction methods. The FBP method is widely used in clinical setting while iterative methods have attracted research interests in the past decade. In this paper we studied the performance of the FBP, the ML and the MAP methods using simulated projection data. The experiment showed that the MAP algorithm generated superior image quality in terms of the bias, the variance, and the average mean squared error (MSE) measures. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 25
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance evaluation of filtered back projection reconstruction and iterative ML reconstruction method for PET images
    Wang, CX
    Snyder, WE
    Bilbro, G
    Santago, P
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 1996: IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 2710 : 880 - 887
  • [2] COMPARISON OF ITERATIVE FILTERED BACKPROJECTION AND WEIGHTED LEAST-SQUARES RECONSTRUCTION METHODS
    LALUSH, DS
    TSUI, BMW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1994, 35 (05) : P28 - P28
  • [3] Systematic investigation of the reconstruction of images from transmission tomography using a Filtered Backprojection and an iterative OSML reconstruction algorithm
    Ziegler, A
    Heuscher, D
    Köhler, T
    Nielsen, T
    Proksa, R
    Utrup, S
    [J]. 2004 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 2516 - 2519
  • [4] Iterative reconstruction of FDG-PET data: Diagnostic value compared to filtered backprojection.
    Becker, S
    Ziegler, SI
    Weber, W
    Romer, W
    Avril, N
    SChwaiger, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1997, 38 (05) : 374 - 374
  • [5] Performance analysis of the filtered backprojection image reconstruction algorithms
    Pipatsrisawat, T
    Gacic, A
    Franchetti, F
    Püschel, M
    Moura, JMF
    [J]. 2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOLS 1-5: SPEECH PROCESSING, 2005, : 153 - 156
  • [6] Ramp filter artifact associated with filtered backprojection, resolved with iterative reconstruction
    E. Gordon DePuey
    [J]. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019, 26 : 1383 - 1391
  • [7] Quantitation of striatal DAT binding: Is iterative reconstruction an alternative to filtered backprojection?
    Tatsch, K
    Koch, W
    Hamann, C
    Hahn, K
    Radau, PE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2002, 43 (05) : 55P - 55P
  • [8] PET with F-18-fluoride: Effects of iterative versus filtered backprojection reconstruction on kinetic modeling
    Schiepers, C
    Nuyts, J
    Wu, HM
    Verma, RC
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1997, 44 (04) : 1591 - 1593
  • [9] Ramp filter artifact associated with filtered backprojection, resolved with iterative reconstruction
    DePuey, E. Gordon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (04) : 1383 - 1391
  • [10] Improved attenuation correction method for SPECT by iterative filtered backprojection reconstruction
    Chuang, K.
    Lue, K.
    Lin, H.
    Wang, H.
    Ni, Y.
    Jan, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2014, 41 : S366 - S366