Disparities in Visual Acuity Outcomes after Endothelial Keratoplasty An Intelligent Research in Sight Registry Analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Srikumaran, Divya [1 ]
Son, Hyeck-Soo [1 ,4 ]
Li, Charles [2 ]
Schein, Oliver [1 ]
Pramanik, Sudeep [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Amer Acad Ophthalmol, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Mid Atlantic Cornea Consultants, Towson, MD USA
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Heidelberg, Baden Wuerttemb, Germany
关键词
DMEK; DSAEK; Endothelial keratoplasty; IRIS Registry; Visual acuity; GRAFT-SURVIVAL; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; AMERICAN ACADEMY; COLOR-VISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.04.005
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess risk factors for lack of vision improvement after endothelial keratoplasty (EK). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: Patients aged 18 years and older in the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS (R)) Registry who underwent EK surgery in the United States between 2013 and 2018. Methods: Change in visual acuity (VA) relative to baseline were determined at 6 months and 1 year. A multivariable population-average marginal model estimated using generalized estimating equations adjusting for sociodemographic factors, baseline vision, surgical indication, ocular comorbidities, and postoperative complications was used to identify factors associated with worse VA outcomes. Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity and lack of VA improvement at 1 year compared with preoperative status. Results: A total of 30 600 EK procedures (N = 25 666 unique patients) were included in the analysis. Overall, VA improved from median logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.54 (Snellen 20/69) (inter-quartile range [IQR] +/- 0.70) preoperatively to median logMAR 0.40 (20/50) (IQR +/- 0.36) at 6 months and median logMAR 0.30 (20/40) (IQR +/- 0.36) at 1 year postoperatively. A total of 30.3% of the overall cohort, 29.8% of Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) subgroup, and 27.4% of the bullous keratopathy (BK) subgroup did not show visual improvement at 1 year postoperatively. In the FECD subgroup, older age (risk ratio [RR], 1.05 per 5-year increase, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.07) and female sex (RR, 1.10, 95% CI, 1.04-1.16) were associated with VA worse than or equal to baseline at 1 year postoperatively. In both FECD and BK subgroups, eyes with higher baseline logMAR VA (per 0.1 unit increase in logMAR) were more likely to have visual improvement postoperatively (FECD: RR, 0.82, 95% CI, 0.81-0.84; BK: RR, 0.91, 95% CI, 0.91-0.92), whereas postoperative rebubbling (FECD: RR, 1.10, 95% CI, 1.02-1.19; BK: RR, 1.31, 95% CI, 1.17-1.48) and repeat keratoplasties (FECD: RR, 1.41, 95% CI, 1.32-1.52; BK: RR, 1.42, 95% CI, 1.28-1.57) were associated with higher risk of no VA improvement. Conclusions: In this large national cohort, postoperative rebubblings and repeat keratoplasties were identified as independent factors associated with worse VA outcomes after EK for both FECD and BK subgroups. Older age and female gender were associated with worse VA outcomes after EK in the FECD subgroup. (C) 2022 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 922
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visual Acuity Outcomes and Complications after Intraocular Lens Exchange An IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Analysis
    Son, Hyeck-Soo
    Chang, David F.
    Li, Charles
    Liu, Lynn
    Zafar, Sidra
    Lum, Flora
    Woreta, Fasika A.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 131 (04) : 403 - 411
  • [2] Visual acuity outcomes after Descmet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty compared to penetrating keratoplasty
    Mouna, Ali
    Premy, S.
    Agapie, A.
    Jean-Colas, A.
    Ameloot, F.
    Manea, G.
    Perone, J.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2013, 91
  • [4] Geographic Disparities in Glaucoma Surgical Care: An Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry Analysis
    Lokhande, Anagha
    Aziz, Kanza
    Pasquale, Louis R.
    Shen, Lucy Q.
    Friedman, David S.
    Boland, Michael V.
    Lorch, Alice Carlyle
    Miller, Joan W.
    Wang, Mengyu
    Zebardast, Nazlee
    Elze, Tobias
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [5] Three-Year Visual Acuity Outcomes after Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Li, Jennifer Y.
    Terry, Mark A.
    Goshe, Jeffrey
    Davis-Boozer, David
    Shamie, Neda
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 119 (06) : 1126 - 1129
  • [6] Comparison of Central Corneal Graft Thickness to Visual Acuity Outcomes in Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Neff, Kristiana D.
    Biber, Joseph M.
    Holland, Edward J.
    CORNEA, 2011, 30 (04) : 388 - 391
  • [7] Comparison of Visual Acuity Outcomes Between Nanothin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Kurji, Khaliq H.
    Cheung, Albert Y.
    Eslani, Medi
    Rolfes, Erin J.
    Chachare, Deepali Y.
    Auteri, Nicholas J.
    Nordlund, Michael L.
    Holland, Edward J.
    CORNEA, 2018, 37 (10) : 1226 - 1231
  • [8] Modeling the Effect of Forward Scatter and Aberrations on Visual Acuity after Endothelial Keratoplasty
    McLaren, Jay W.
    Patel, Sanjay V.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2012, 53 (09) : 5545 - 5551
  • [9] The Relationship between Donor Graft Characteristics and Visual Acuity Outcomes after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Schear, Matthew
    Shih, Carolyn
    Rosen, Lisa
    Hong, Bennett
    Chen, Katherine
    Nauheim, David
    Gorski, Matthew
    Winokur, Jules
    Steiner, Anne
    Udell, Ira J.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [10] Risk Factors for Repeat Keratoplasty After Endothelial Keratoplasty An IRIS Registry Analysis
    Son, Hyeck-Soo
    Lum, Flora
    LI, Charles
    Schein, Oliver
    Pramanik, Sudeep
    Srikumaran, Divya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 242 : 77 - 87