The perception of shared governance and engagement in decision-making among nurses

被引:4
|
作者
Jaber, Ahmed [1 ]
Ta'an, Wafa'a F. [1 ]
Aldalaykeh, Mohammed K. [1 ]
Al-Shannaq, Yasmin M. [1 ]
Oweidat, Islam A. [2 ]
Mukattash, Tareq L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Nursing, Community & Mental Hlth Nursing Dept, POB 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[2] Zarqa Univ, Fac Nursing, Nursing Dept, Zarqa, Jordan
[3] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm, Irbid, Jordan
关键词
Jordan; low-middle-income countries; nursing engagement; professional governance; shared governance; PROFESSIONAL GOVERNANCE; IMPLEMENTATION; MANAGERS; OUTCOMES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/nuf.12817
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Shared governance is a structural framework for operationalizing nursing ownership and accountability for nursing practice. Healthcare institutions are striving to promote healthy and satisfactory work conditions to retain their qualified personnel and achieve organizational stability and high care quality. However, little is known about nurses' participation in governance in developing countries. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the levels of shared governance, also known as professional governance, among nurses in Jordan. The demographics of the study participants will also be assessed. Methods: The current study used a cross-sectional design implementing an anonymous online survey technique to collect data from 111 nurses on the Index of Professional Nursing Governance (IPNG). Descriptive statistics were performed to evaluate the nurses' perception of the concept of shared governance in the domains of personnel, information, resources, participation goals and conflict resolution, and practice. Results: Among the 111 nurses, 55% of the participants were females, 45.5% were affiliated with governmental hospitals, and about half of them worked in critical care units. The analysis showed that the mean score for the total IPNG was 113 (SD = 26.28). The analyses of the mean scores of IPNG domains ranged from 11.5 (SD = 4.6) for goals and conflict resolution to 23.8 (SD = 5.7) for access to information. Discussion: The results revealed that nurses' average perception of professional governance demonstrated shared governance, and more specifically, in the lower level of shared governance where decisions are made primarily by management with some staff input. Analysis of the domains of governance revealed that participants' scores corresponded with shared governance in the areas of information, resources, goals and conflict, and practice, while traditional governance was prevalent in the governance of nursing personnel and participation. Conclusion: There is an agreement on the need of moving the position of frontline nurses to the center of their organizations where equity, accountability, and ownership are the pillars of participative governance. Frontline nurses need further empowerment to be more actively engaged especially in the management of nursing staff and related structures and in the participation in structures connected to governance activities at different organizational levels such as in committees.
引用
收藏
页码:1169 / 1175
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nurses' Perception of Shared Decision-Making Processes: Quantifying a Shared Governance Culture
    Gerard, Sally O.
    Owens, Deborah L.
    Oliver, Patricia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 46 (09): : 477 - 483
  • [2] Patient Engagement and Shared Decision-Making
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Mulla, Sohail M.
    Scott, Ian A.
    Jackevicius, Cynthia A.
    You, John J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (04) : 562 - 562
  • [3] Patient Engagement and Shared Decision-Making
    Gordon H. Guyatt
    Sohail M. Mulla
    Ian A. Scott
    Cynthia A. Jackevicius
    John J. You
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2014, 29 : 562 - 562
  • [4] Effects of an educational programme on shared decision-making among Korean nurses
    Jo, Kae-Hwa
    An, Gyeong-Ju
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (06) : 839 - 846
  • [5] PARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE - MODEL FOR SHARED DECISION-MAKING
    HIRSCH, S
    SHULMAN, LC
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 1976, 1 (04) : 433 - 446
  • [6] Influences of Nursing Professionalism, Empathy, and Clinical Decision-Making Ability on Shared Decision-Making Awareness among Hemodialysis Nurses
    Yun, Junghwa
    Seong, Mihyeon
    Cho, Youngmi
    Sok, Sohyune
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 2024
  • [7] Staff Perceptions of Decision-Making in a Shared Governance Culture
    Di Fiore, Tina
    Zito, Antoinette
    Berardinelli, Amy
    Bena, James F.
    Morrison, Shannon L.
    Keck, Diane E.
    Kennedy, Kathleen
    Stibich, Ann
    Albert, Nancy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 48 (11): : 561 - 566
  • [8] The effectiveness of simulation education program on shared decision-making attitudes among nurses in Taiwan
    Lin, Mei-Hsiang
    Lin, Shu-Chuan
    Lee, Yu-Hsia
    Wang, Pao-Yu
    Wu, Hon-Yen
    Hsu, Hsiu-Chin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [9] Shared Decision-Making Is Not Patient Decision-Making
    Birnbrich, Alysa
    McCulloch, Patrick C.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    [J]. SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2023, 15 (04): : 615 - 616
  • [10] The Superiority of Patient Engagement and Shared Decision-Making in Noninferiority Trials
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    McNaughton-Collins, Mary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (01) : 16 - 17