Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate physical activity public health programs in Mexico

被引:20
|
作者
Jauregui, Edtna [1 ,2 ]
Pacheco, Ann M. [3 ]
Soltero, Erica G. [3 ]
O'Connor, Teresia M. [4 ]
Castro, Cynthia M. [5 ]
Estabrooks, Paul A. [6 ]
McNeill, Lorna H. [7 ]
Lee, Rebecca E. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guadalajara, Ctr Univ Ciencias Salud, Inst Ciencias Aplicadas Actividad Fis & Deporte, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico
[2] Secretaria Salud, Dept Prevent Med, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
[3] Univ Houston, Dept Hlth & Human Performance, Texas Obes Res Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Childrens Nutr Res Ctr, USDA ARS, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford Prevent Res Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[7] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Res Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[8] Arizona State Univ, Coll Nursing & Hlth Innovat, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
来源
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
NATIONAL-HEALTH; DISEASE RISK; OBESITY; IMPACT; INTERVENTIONS; PREVALENCE; INACTIVITY; PROMOTION; COVERAGE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-015-1474-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Physical activity (PA) public health programming has been widely used in Mexico; however, few studies have documented individual and organizational factors that might be used to evaluate their public health impact. The RE-AIM framework is an evaluation tool that examines individual and organizational factors of public health programs. The purpose of this study was to use the RE-AIM framework to determine the degree to which PA programs in Mexico reported individual and organizational factors and to investigate whether reporting differed by the program's funding source. Methods: Public health programs promoting PA were systematically identified during 2008-2013 and had to have an active program website. Initial searches produced 23 possible programs with 12 meeting inclusion criteria. A coding sheet was developed to capture behavioral, outcome and RE-AIM indicators from program websites. Results: In addition to targeting PA, five (42%) programs also targeted dietary habits and the most commonly reported outcome was change in body composition (58%). Programs reported an average of 11.1 (similar to 3.9) RE-AIM indicator items (out of 27 total). On average, 45% reported reach indicators, 34% reported efficacy/ effectiveness indicators, 60% reported adoption indicators, 40% reported implementation indicators, and 35% reported maintenance indicators. The proportion of RE-AIM indicators reported did not differ significantly for programs that were government supported (M = 10, SD = 3.1) and programs that were partially or wholly privately or corporately supported (M = 12.0, SD = 4.4). Conclusion: While reach and adoption of these programs were most commonly reported, there is a need for stronger evaluation of behavioral and health outcomes before the public health impact of these programs can be established.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate physical activity public health programs in México
    Edtna Jauregui
    Ann M Pacheco
    Erica G Soltero
    Teresia M O’Connor
    Cynthia M Castro
    Paul A Estabrooks
    Lorna H McNeill
    Rebecca E Lee
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 15
  • [2] Using a Mixed-Methods RE-AIM Framework to Evaluate Community Health Programs for Older Latinas
    Schwingel, Andiara
    Galvez, Patricia
    Linares, Deborah
    Sebastiao, Emerson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH, 2017, 29 (04) : 551 - 593
  • [3] Planning and evaluating health programs: contributions of the RE-AIM framework to Nursing
    Almeida, Fabio Araujo
    Brito, Fabiana Almeida
    [J]. REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2014, 22 (04): : 527 - 528
  • [4] Re-thinking Physical Activity Programs for Older Brazilians and the Role of Public Health Centers: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using the RE-AIM Model
    Bertoldo Benedetti, Tania Rosane
    Rech, Cassiano Ricardo
    Konrad, Lisandra Maria
    Almeida, Fabio Araujo
    Brito, Fabiana A.
    Chodzko-Zajko, Wojtek
    Schwingel, Andiara
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 8
  • [5] Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework
    Glasgow, RE
    Vogt, TM
    Boles, SM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (09) : 1322 - 1327
  • [6] Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a community-based participatory project
    Lam, Helen
    Quinn, Michael
    Chandrasekar, Edwin
    Kim, Karen
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2017, 26 (02)
  • [7] Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change
    Jilcott, Stephanie
    Ammerman, Alice
    Sommers, Janice
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2007, 34 (02) : 105 - 114
  • [8] Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities: a meta-analysis using the RE-AIM framework
    Wen Yang
    Xiao Liang
    Cindy Hui-Ping Sit
    [J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19
  • [9] Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities: a meta-analysis using the RE-AIM framework
    Yang, Wen
    Liang, Xiao
    Sit, Cindy Hui-Ping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [10] Using the RE-AIM Framework to Evaluate the Statewide Dissemination of a School-Based Physical Activity and Nutrition Curriculum: "Exercise Your Options"
    Dunton, Genevieve F.
    Lagloire, Renee
    Robertson, Trina
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2009, 23 (04) : 229 - 232